Carlos Correa: Future Roto Star
You have to scroll all the way down to the 24th ranked shortstop, Eugenio Suarez, to find a hitter who recorded fewer at-bats than Carlos Correa did this season. And yet, Correa still managed to finish second in dollar value among all shortstops. He did it in just 387 at-bats and 432 plate appearances.
That suggests two things — that damn the shortstop crop was terribly weak this year (despite finishing second, Correa did earn just $10.10 in value) and damn that Correa kid is going to be awesome. Because he did that at the tender age of 20.
The craziest thing is that no one expected him to be up with the big boys so soon. In fact, on his player page, his ETA is indicated as being 2017. How often are players promoted two seasons earlier than projected?! Heading into the 2015 season, Correa had just completed High-A, displayed solid, albeit unspectacular, power, strong BABIP ability and a clear understanding of the strike zone with an excellent walk rate and reasonable strikeout rate.
So he opened the year in Double-A this season, where he made an absolute mockery of the pitching, as he posted a not-a-typo .515 wOBA and .342 ISO. Ummm yeah, I think it was time to challenge him with a move to Triple-A.
So the Astros did just that, but he found the higher level much more difficult. He posted a much less impressive .347 wOBA there, though it was more than respectable considering his age and how fast he had been moving through the system. Still, after just 113 plate appearances, it was a big surprise he was called up so quickly. Had Jed Lowrie not gotten injured, things likely would have been different. Correa may not have debuted until September for his cup of coffee.
But he did debut, and what a debut he had. His walk and strikeout rates regressed a bit and sat around where one might expect. That’s a good thing though because it proved that the youngster wasn’t overmatched. And his 8.4% SwStk% was meaningfully below the league average.
The biggest surprise was clearly his power. While he went on a power binge at Double-A, he was in the mid-to-high .100s for his ISO over the rest of his minor league career, and posted just a .173 mark at Triple-A. And yet, despite a future Game Power grade of 55, which equates to 19-22 homers, Correa posted a .233 ISO and 24.2% HR/FB rate and swatted 22 homers (the high end of that scouting grade range) in about two-thirds of a season. He also finished 54th (out of 333 who hit at least 30 flies + homers) in batted ball distance with a 294 foot average (this is using an updated list from what’s posted at Baseball Heat Maps), so his power was legit.
But possessing legit power doesn’t automatically support any HR/FB rate. And it would seem that even if he continued to hit baseballs that far, he would be quite unlikely to sustain a HR/FB rate in the mid-20% range. So that seems to be a bit of a fluke. And if you want to go a step further in forecasting him for 2016, you might also assume that there will be some growing pains, especially because he wasn’t projected for such massive power, and certainly not this quickly. So I will almost assuredly be projected a sub-20% HR/FB rate for next year.
Aside from the power, Correa brings a nice bonus of stolen bases. He somehow managed just one triple, even playing half his games in a park that boost triple totals. But he clearly has good speed, though I’d think around 20 swipes would be his ceiling.
Any projection system is going to expect some regression next year. But there does seem to be one avenue for upside — his BABIP. He posted just a .296 mark, but owned a solid batted ball distribution that featured grounders and line drives, while he went to all fields as evidenced by his batted ball direction rates. He has posted some sky high BABIP marks in the minors, so he’s shown that skill before. A jump in BABIP would offset some of the homers he loses and set a floor for his batting average.
So the bottom line on Correa is first and foremost to temper your expectations. It’s hard not to salivate over his skill set, but just remember that this is a 21-year-old and hitters don’t improve in a straight upward line. While I cannot predict the future, he seems a near lock to be overvalued in drafts next year, though of course there is that small possibility he earns his cost. But whatever he does in 2016 season shouldn’t overshadow the fact that we may be looking at a perennial all-star and annual first round pick.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Off-topic, but related since you mentioned him–any quick thoughts on Suarez, given the weakness of the SS position? Seems like he had a bit of a power spurt this year and has traditionally had better BB% in the past. In mixed leagues do you think he could be more of a back-end starting SS or is he just a MI? Thanks!
If Phillips gets dealt I like Suarez a lot more. He could have cloudy PT if both Cozart and Phillips are on the roster/healthy come the spring.
True, I guess I was thinking that the Reds might just move on from Cozart if they don’t trade Phillips. Obviously, he’s a better defender than Suarez, but he offers nothing with the bat and is due another raise in arbitration. At 30, he’s not young either. If they wanted to trade him, I was thinking you could probably find a taker looking for a backup MI with good defense and get an A-ball power arm for him.
Totally: my comment should have read Phillips or Cozart.
Wait, so we’re regressing Correa’s power because of last year’s scouting report? Last year he was 19, spent half a season at A+, and half a season on the DL with a broken leg.
I could be convinced that his HR/FB% is going to regress, but we’ve got substantially better data this year than we did last year. We should be markedly altering our future projections for Correa. The list of guys who hit 20+ HR as a 20 year old is very short, composed of all time great hitters, and lacking in an example of someone whose power took a meaningful step backwards at age 21.
Add that to the fact that his K% declined throughout the summer and the BB% jumped significantly after his first month, and his season long stats might be underselling his current true talent level. I know 21 year old hitters don’t improve in a straight upward line but 21 year olds do improve and it is more reasonable to expect that he will improve than he will regress.
For 2016, yes, no projection is going to forecast an improvement from the .233 ISO he posted this year.
So is Correa a first round pick in fantasy sports in 2016?
Could he earn first round value? Of course. But I absolutely would not take him there. Far too much risk.
If he can just hit 23 pop ups to the left side in MM he should pass his 2015 HR total. What a joke of a stadium.
Number of parks easier to hit homeruns in: 9.
What a joke of a comment.
Hey there jefe, I’m not sure how more clear I could have made it that I said the LEFT side. So since you did your homework on park factors (for one year), I know that you can also do your homework on park dimensions and park overlays. So I would love for you to find me a more hitter friendly/goofy looking LF than MM, aside from Fenway.
I think between that, a hill in CF, and a flag pole in fair play equates to a joke of a stadium. Even the Astros finally had enough and said the hill would be removed. Ssooo, I guess I win?
Seriously though, don’t even try to come up with a more goofy stadium. I think all 29 fan bases would list MM in the top three, and it would take the majority of the first place votes.
29 OTHER fan bases. I’m well aware there are 30 teams, so don’t try to use that against me there, Jefe.
I assumed you were suggesting that Correa’s power numbers could be explained by the Crawford Boxes because this article was discussing Correa and focused largely on his higher than projected ISO. I thought you were getting at something along the lines of: ‘Correa hit more HR than anyone expected because you just need to hit pop-ups to left at MMP, so he just needs to do that again in 2016’. I now see you were using this space to voice your complaints about various ‘goofy’ characteristics about MMP, most of which have nothing to do with the article, so I apologize for the rude comment.
I realized you said ‘the left side’. But then you followed it with what a joke of a stadium. So I was thinking you thought the MMP was a joke because it is easy to hit homeruns in it, when in actuallity it falls pretty consistently between 8th and 10th. To reiterate, the assumption was again based on how your comment related to the discussion in the article.
I understand now that your views on the jokeness of the stadium is not just based on the short left field, but rather the short left field and Tal’s hill. I disliked the idea of the hill in center when MMP was being built. I thought it would be a place where players would get hurt and it would distract from the game. It still seems like a strange decision to put it in but the hill has grown on me. And even when I disliked the hill, I never felt the disgust that so many other fans feel when they see the hill. Nothing is more exciting when you see a play made on the hill, and why would you hate anything that would create that much more excitement without any adverse effects?
Now after 15 years of the hill there is a plan to remove it :(. I don’t know Jim Crane personally, but I think his decision to remove the hill was not based on the fact that 29 other fan bases would probably vote MMP as the goofiest park, but rather his decision to spend 15 million dollars had more to due with added revenue from using that space to build a bar like area that would get millennials out to the games and spending more money on booze and other young people things.
P.S. I don’t know if you are aware, but the plan to remove Tal’s Hill has been pushed back a year, so enjoy it while you can.