Buy These 3 Starting Pitcher Velocity Surgers
In this condensed spring training, it’s become tougher to use what we’ve seen so far to make projection adjustments. So really, the only thing I care at least a little bit about right now, besides playing time outlook, is a pitcher’s velocity. Specifically, I care more about increased velocity than I do decreased velocity. While a decline in velocity could signal that something is wrong, it’s more likely the pitcher is just gradually working his way up to his normal velocity and will be fine by opening day. On the other hand, you can’t fake increased velocity and there’s no reason for a pitcher to decide one outing to just go all out for the fun of it. I’m a sucker for velocity jumps, as it very oftentimes coincides with a major breakout. So let’s discuss three velocity surgers so far. Remember, the sample size of pitches thrown is really small, so it’s certainly possible that these averages will come down by the time opening day comes around.
| Pitcher | 2021 4-Seam Fastball MPH | 2021 Sinker MPH | 2022 4-Seam Fastball MPH | 2022 Sinker MPH | 4-Seam Fastball MPH Gain | Sinker MPH Gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitch Keller | 93.8 | 97.3 | 3.5 | |||
| Jesus Luzardo | 95.9 | 95.1 | 98.0 | 97.9 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| Joe Ryan | 91.2 | 92.4 | 1.2 |
The table compares each pitcher’s four-seam fastball velocity from the 2021 regular season to this year’s spring training. Since Jesus Luzardo also throws a sinker, I added a column comparing those velocities as well.
Mitch Keller
Like seriously, holy guacamole. I have been on an off the Keller bandwagon and all he’s done is drive me to tears. Just a couple of years ago, he was the Pirates’ second best prospect, ranking 34th overall. Sadly, his career has gotten off to a rocky start, to say the least. Over about a season’s worth of innings, his ERA stands at an ugly 6.02, while his SIERA is a more palatable, but still disappointing, 4.79. Walks have been a problem, and he has struggled to whiff a higher enough rate of hitters to offset the control issues.
Suddenly, spring training 2022 begins and after 35 four-seamers, his fastball is up an incredible 3.5 MPH in velocity! That’s absurd! Last Thursday, Statcast shows him maxing out at 99.8 MPH with that fastball. According to his Pitch Type Splits page, his fastball has never exceeded 98.3 MPH while in the Majors. I don’t know what he did during the offseason, but this is a totally new Keller.
Historically, his four-seamer has been nothing special from a whiff perspective, averaging a 7.1% SwStk%. His slider has been his best whiff pitch and would make for a fantastic complement to an improved fastball, while a better fastball could potentially make his curveball and changeup actually worth throwing. Both those latter pitches have generated weak SwStk% marks. The changeup, specifically, has generated the lowest SwStk% (1.6%) I’ve ever seen for that pitch type, and one of the lowest for any pitch type over a reasonable sample! So clearly there’s loads of room for these rates to rise.
Is it as simple as gaining over three miles per hour on his fastball? I don’t know, as he still needs to throw strikes. But it certainly makes him wayyyyy more interesting now, and more than just a fingers-crossed buy in NL-Only leagues. Buy him now before word spreads. Heck, I just selected him in the last of our six-round reserve draft in my 12-team mixed league, so I’m practicing what I preach.
Jesus Luzardo
Remember him?! It feels like so long ago, but he once was the Athletics’ top prospect and the fifth best overall prospect. Unfortunately, his MLB career hasn’t gone that differently than Keller’s has. Luzardo’s career ERA stands at 5.36 (versus a more acceptable 4.36 SIERA), his strikeout rate has been blah, and his walk rate has been worse than the league average. The Pirates have stuck with Keller, but the A’s shipped Luzardo off to the Marlins, where he didn’t fare any better last year despite being able to face the pitcher.
I already drafted him in LABR Mixed, because he’s exactly the type to just close your eyes and hope the light bulb goes off, as he realizes his former top prospect promise. But now his four-seamer is up 2.1 MPH and his sinker is up 2.8 MPH during spring training? Holy cow, give me all the shares!
What excites me so much about Luzardo, even ignoring this velocity spike, is that he already owns two excellent pitches. His slider has generated an elite 21.1% SwStk% during his short career, while his changeup is at 18.2%. His four-seamer has been solid itself at an 8.1% rate, while his sinker is about average for the pitch type. So it’s clear that the quality of his stuff hasn’t actually deteriorated. Now I wonder how much more effective those pitches might be if they come in two-to-two and a half miles per hour faster.
I can see the headlines now for Keller and Luzardo at season’s end – “Former top prospects ride velocity gains to breakout seasons”.
Joe Ryan
Finally, we have the least experienced pitcher who debuted last year. Unlike the above two, Ryan enjoyed a pretty darn good debut last year, but a suppressed LOB% hit some superb skills. Throughout his minor league career, Ryan has posted some insane strikeout rate and combined them with low walk rates. If you were just looking at the stats, you would think he was a top five pitching prospect in baseball. But he wasn’t, and is not. In fact, he is only ranked as the Twins’ sixth best prospect and failed to even make the top 100 overall list. Even his future role is expected to be a multi-inning reliever, rather than a starting pitcher!
Why? Probably because scouts just cannot ignore velocity, no matter what stats the pitchers posts. From our blurb:
Throughout his time in the minors, Ryan’s strikeout rate has left many scratching their heads. With a fastball that sits 90-94 mph, it was hard to understand the 37.3% K-rate (against just 6.5% walks) he’d posted in his 29 professional starts across the 2018 and ’19 seasons, not to mention his swinging strike rates, which were among the minor leagues’ best.
But then came the explanation:
Understanding that success requires an examination of Ryan’s approach angle – he creates backspin that seems impossible based on his release point, thanks to a seemingly incongruously high arm slot and very short levers – which gives him the look of a starter, unlike other hurlers with similarly low releases. That deceptive approach angle allows his fastball to play up, with batters swinging over it, especially when he can place it in at their hands.
Deception. We hear that a lot, especially applied to pitchers with underwhelming velocity. Well how about when that pitcher’s velocity increases by more than a mile per hour? You assume the deception remains, so a faster fastball should be even more difficult to make contact with. It was hard to believe Ryan could come anywhere close to the small sample strikeout rate he posted during his MLB debut, let alone the elite marks he posted in the minors. A velocity bump doesn’t guarantee he will now, but certainly gives him a better chance to prove his skeptics wrong.
What’s interesting is that the fastball that was meh in velocity last year actually generated an above average 11% SwStk%. Again, likely due to deception. Add more velocity and it could get even better and/or make it more difficult for batters to adjust to his delivery, resulting in strikeout rate regression. He paired that fastball with a strong slider that generated an 18.2% and a solid enough changeup that was also in the mid-teens in SwStk%.
I think it would have been right to question the sustainability of his strikeout rate and SwStk% mark given his velocity, but a jump there should help stave off regression. He’s an extreme fly-baller, but that’s not so bad in and of itself, as that should lead to a low BABIP. Combined with his low walk rate, that’s a lot of solo homers.
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
If Joey Ryan has a good year he will continue on as a starter. And ya Mitch Keller stresses us out every year. He is capable……but will he finally produce. For me in an auction, I will take Keller for a buck but if any bidding starts forget it. Joey Ryan is actually going for a few bucks. ( $3 to $7 ). Luzardo is one of the high risk high reward pitchers but if he blows up he can hurt you badly. Nice article,. Very interesting.
Man please just call him Joe… “Joey Ryan” is a name that sets off alarms in the heads of wrestling fans lol
I traded for Luzardo late last season after the trade to Miami; Marlins have done such a good job developing young starters recently. I’m hoping it pays off; the velocity gains are a good sign to start!
Yeah, these guys will all blow their arms out trying to become fireballers all of a sudden. Wait on it.
Everyone’s downvoting this comment, but they’re not wrong. Velocity increases of this nature are strongly correlated with major injury. Correlation is not causation, but in this case, I think we can be pretty confident of the causal path. We knew, all else equal (i.e. same pitcher, similar mechanics) higher velocity is higher stress throughout the entire kinetic chain. So, if a guy’s pumping +4 mph all of a sudden, we know they’re putting more stress on their joints. And it’s not like they weren’t already highly stressed.
“I’m a sucker for velocity jumps, as it very oftentimes coincides with a major breakout.”
Dumb question: is this actually true? Like has anyone validated this hypothesis?
I found this article from a few years ago (https://www.quantumsportssolutions.com/blogs/baseball/spring-training-velocity-drops-do-they-have-predictive-value) suggesting that spring training velocity DROPS are somewhat predictive but the effect largely fades after April, and also this old Mike Fast article from 2011 (https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/13380/spinning-yarn-do-spring-speeds-matter/) using PitchF/x data that likewise found a velocity correlation (albeit a fairly mild one after adjusting for temperature) but did not actually look at in-season performance.
Is this one of those things that seems intuitively true but hasn’t been studied in depth or is there more analysis out there that supports it?
It’s true. It’s as simple as running a correlation between velocity and strikeout rate. All else equal, higher velocity = higher strikeout rate.
Might there be a similar article coming about Spring Training velocity spikes amongst relief pitchers?
Obviously we know velocity is correlated with K rate, the question is to what degree pitchers maintain spring velocity jumps into the season. If someone averaged 93 on their fastball for a few seasons then all of a sudden is throwing 96 during spring training, how much of that jump should we expect them to maintain during the season, and what corresponding performance bump should we expect?
I wouldn’t expect you to answer this question in a regular little preseason fantasy post, but given how much research has been done over the years on the predictive validity of spring training stats (or more frequently the lack thereof) I am surprised that I could not find anything to directly support your contention that a springtime velocity surge is often correlated with a major breakout.
I did find a study you did a decade ago that found some predictive validity for K% and BB% (https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/spring-training-stats-that-matter/) but there is nothing in there about velocity as such. (This study from 2015 apparently found something similar: https://web.archive.org/web/20150312071629/http://www.economist.com/blogs/gametheory/2015/03/baseball-statistics.)
I wonder if rather than looking at spring velocity in a vacuum it might make more sense to include spring K% rate as well to see if the improved velocity has actually led to improved results. I’d also be curious to see how max spring velocity compares with average spring velocity for usefulness in predicting breakouts, since in a small sample looking for events with signature significance could be just as informative as averages.
FWIW, here’s one of Mike’s pieces from last year noting guys who had marked velo bumps in their 1st start. Some kept the gains, some didn’t. Overall as a group it’s pretty much a mixed bag. Obviously Burnes and Ohtani were fantastic as was Houck in limited innings. Greinke was serviceable with a 4.16 ERA (though the lack of K’s hurt). Everyone else was somewhere between yucky (MadBum) and truly awful (Singer, Minor, Bundy)
https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/starting-pitcher-fastball-velocity-gainers-apr-6-2021/
That’s not what he asked.
There are really a two things you’d want to prove:
The first is obviously true in both directions, with the first article you link showing that; I think if they broke out the different scales of increases it would be even more obvious.
The second statement is true empirically, though I’m having trouble finding an analysis to support it. It’d be pretty easy to run the analysis, though.
This is a very valid question!
I’ve always been a Keller guy. But with bigger velocity, I mean his floor is a lights out reliever/closer with that FB/SL combo. Unless the higher velo fastball can bring the off speed stuff along, that could be his fate.
Jesus Lizard on the other hand is really exciting. He already has two elite off-speed pitches with the Changeup and Curveball. Some extra mustard on the FB/SI could work wonders. I’m buying him on all fronts.
Keller already gave back 1mph in his second start…
Dumb question- where do we find a stat page of spring training velocity?
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search
Change “season type” and “season,” obviously, select fastballs as a group, and sort by avg. pitch velocity.
Cole Irvin?
Great article. Validates my obsession with Ryan 🙂 but his cost is rising by the day sadly
Would love to see the same article but for spin rates. Is this data even available?