Brad Peacock: New Plumage in Houston

Monday’s surprising Oakland/Houston trade has generated a lot of buzz in baseball circles. While most of the discussion centered around Jed Lowrie and Chris Carter, one interesting name headed out of the Bay Area is Brad Peacock, former Nationals blue-chipper who was moved to Oakland last offseason in the Gio Gonzalez deal. Many may remember there was a fair amount of sleeper buzz last spring surrounding Washington’s former number one prospect, even after he was slated to start the season in Triple-A. Unfortunately, he just never seemed to put it together. Peacock, who seemed to be a candidate to be the first recall after the Athletics broke camp, eventually struggled to a 6.01 ERA for the Sacramento River Cats, never getting the call to make the trip short trip west down I-80.

If you’re just staring at his 2012 stats and grimacing, there is a degree of “caveat emptor.” Sacramento plays in the Pacific Coast League, a league notorious for horrendously inflated offense. His BABIP was a rather high .340 meaning his 4.26 FIP was more than a run and a half lower than his ERA. Further, he struck out more than a batter an inning, registering a 22.8% K%. This and his gaudy 2011 minor league K% are positives, especially since they stand in contrast to some scouting reports which don’t consider his raw stuff overpowering. More troubling was his 10.8% BB%. No one would confuse him with Greg Maddux, but Peacock’s BB% sat around 6-8% in the low minors, a number that would translate much more favorably to the big league level. North of 10% is just too high, especially when he lacks the swing-and-miss pitches of guys who work around high walk rates like Yu Darvish. The walks might only be a relatively recent phenomenon, but the levels where he has shown weaker control are AAA and the majors (during his brief stint with the Nationals in 2011), so this is something to keep an eye on.

Looking forward, an immediate issue facing Peacock is the park effects from his new digs. In terms of pure run-scoring, the ballpark formerly known as Enron Field is actually — contrary to popular belief — not that much worse for pitchers than the O.co Coliseum. One area there is a big discrepancy, however, is home runs. Oakland is in the top five big league stadiums for home run suppression with Minute Maid on the opposite side of the spectrum (bottom ten). This is especially concerning for Peacock, who has exhibited a growing proclivity to give up flyballs as he has worked his way up the ladder (minor league GO/FO the last four years: 1.35, 1.13, 0.75, 0.62). Playing in Oakland would have gone a long way towards masking this but “The Juice Box” might not be so kind to his HR/FB%, and correspondingly, his ERA.

As far as opportunity, Peacock should have a better shot locking down a full-time rotation slot in Houston. Beyond Bud Norris and Lucas Harrell the rotation race seems wide open, with youngster Jordan Lyles, one-hit wonder Phil Humber, perennially injured Erik Bedard, and mediocre-at-best Dallas Keuchel the main guys ahead of him on the depth chart.

Should he win a job out of spring training, he is probably worth a last-round or $1 flier in deeper redraft leagues in case he can hold the elevated K% and shave the walks, although owners should remember the ‘Stros aren’t in the National League Central anymore. Peacock’s keeper value is a little higher but with him now 25, there are fewer people around baseball who believe he has untapped top-of-the-rotation talent. If you don’t need him in your 2013 campaign, this makes him a less appealing option than a pitcher who might need a bit more minor league seasoning, but has a higher long-term ceiling looking 2014 and beyond. Now that he’s out of the PCL and can crack a big league rotation in his mid-20’s, he’s still worth a shot at the right price, but unlike the last couple years, he’s not going to be quite as high on my target list when I’m scouring my cheat sheet for potential breakthrough talent.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members




There are few things Colin loves more in life than a pitcher with a single-digit BB%. Find him on Twitter @soxczar.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mike D.
13 years ago

Don’t forget his brother Drew.

dacureMember since 2025
13 years ago
Reply to  Mike D.

niiiiccccccceeeeeeeee.

Sean
13 years ago

Small nitpick – Peacock was never the Nats’ number one prospect (correct me if I’m reading too far into the sentence, though). He came on strong after the 2011 season but Harper was the consensus #1 then.

Good write-up, though, Colin. I’m interested to see if his changeup can play at the ML level. He should get plenty of chances now that he’s in Houston though.

Stan Gable
13 years ago
Reply to  czar

‘.. (Bryce)Harper has been top-5 overall since he was drafted’

Ha, keep going..

MLB Rainmake
13 years ago

I could be wrong, but I’d read that the book on Peacock was that he had a fastball in the low 90’s (working at 91/92) and had a filthy knuckle-curve that he used quite a bit. He was working on a change, but there was some concern whether he could make it as a starter without another MLB-quality pitch.

From his 2012 stats, it sounds like he hasn’t found that third pitch yet. At this point, it might be time to start thinking about him as a reliever.

SABRphreak
13 years ago

Also heard his fastball lacks sufficient movement. That coupled with the poor command and trying to work on additional pitches resulted in a less than stellar showing in AAA. 2014 should be his biggest growth year and determine his future role/ceiling. I think he needs to start in AAA refine his stuff and, at best, earn a mid-year call-up. He’s not ready to win a starting slot in the Spring and there is no reason to start his arb clock from the pen.

SABRphreak
13 years ago

Correction: 2014 should say 2013.