Big Kid Adds (Week 3)

While the NFBC Main Event garners most of the attention, there are a handful of leagues with even a larger entry fee ($2.5K to $15K). They get originally named “High Stakes Leagues” and this year there are nine of them. With so much money on the line, these fantasy managers are going to try to gain any advantage. Most of the time, these managers will be a week or two ahead of everyone else on their adds. Here are the players and some information on the ones added in four or more of these leagues.

Hitters

Francisco Álvarez (9): The highly-touted prospect topped all bid lists but I don’t get the hype. While the 21-year-old could eventually become great, there are many signs he is not ready to be a major league hitter. While he has tons of power (70 grade, 108.9 maxEV in 2022) he has problems making contact. Here are his strikeout rates and swinging-strike rates over the past two seasons.

Francisco Álvarez’s Swing-and-Miss
Season Level PA K% SwStr% Fastball%
2022 AA 296 24.00% 16.10%
2022 AAA 199 26.10% 14.50%
2022 MLB 14 28.60% 18.60% 41%
2023 AAA 19 42.10% 18.70%
2023 MLB 4 50.00% 26.70% 13%

He struggles against non-fastballs and so far in the majors he’s seen 35% sliders for a 35% SwStr%. With the power and swing-and-miss, he’s a near perfect clone of Mike Zunino. Or Joey Bart.

And in most formats it’ll take a few weeks for him to get catcher eligibility. At least until then, he won’t be dragging down his manager’s team.

Akil Baddoo (9): I probably should have given Baddoo a little more credit in my waiver wire rankings yesterday, but after his struggles last season, I was not interested. He has always shown the ability to steal bases but not much else. While power remains lacking, he has shown better plate discipline with more walks than strikeouts (5% SwStr%) in the minors. He has hit leadoff in two straight games and might have the potential to be a Tommy Edman clone.

Alec Burleson (8): He has been starting and batting second against lefties. The Cardinals face six righties this week with three games at Colorado. There is a chance Burleson gets demoted mid-week if Lars Nootbaar comes off the IL.

Stone Garrett (7): Since being called up, Garrett has started in three of five games as the DH. While he’s a decent hitter (.960 MLB OPS in 98 PA), he’s relegated to the DH spot. The problem is that the Nationals have two other DH types, Joey Meneses and Dominic Smith.

Matt Vierling (7): Has started in seven of nine games while hitting .286/.333/.429 with 1 HR and 1 SB. Balanced player with 15 HR/15 SB upside if given 600 PA.

Gavin Sheets (7): He has been the DH with Eloy Jimenez on the IL and the White Sox face only righties this upcoming week.

Franchy Cordero (7): He has only been facing righties and the Yankees are scheduled to face seven this week. In a small sample, the 28-year-old has improved his plate discipline (34% K% to 20% and 16% SwStr% to 11%). I’m just not going to get too excited for a guy who has hit for a combined .209/.280/.359 with 11 HR and 6 SB in 453 PA over the past three seasons.

Rob Refsnyder (7): While the Yankees face a ton of righties coming up, the Red Sox face a bunch of lefties for it’s Refsnyder time.

He hits lefties better than righties but it is not lights out (career .730 OPS vs LHP, .632 OPS vs RHP). There is probably a better hitter than the right-handed version of Refsnyder on most waiver wires.

Alex Call (7): Started six straight games while leading off over the last three. If he can keep a spot in the lineup, projections have his around 18 HR and 10 SB over a full season. Not an elite talent, but a fine fourth or fifth outfielder.

Luke Raley (6): He only plays against righties and the Rays are scheduled to face five next week. He’s been great when he starts (3 HR, 1.156 OPS) so just make sure the plate appearances keep coming.

Adam Frazier (5): He’s hitting (.320/.414/.560, 1 HR, 2 SB) and playing (started seven of nine games). In some deeper leagues, that’s all a manager can ask out of player.

Kevin Kiermaier (5): Another instance of a guy hitting (.375/.419/.600) and paying (started seven of ten).

Carlos Santana (5): Started every game this year while hitting .235/.333/.441 with 2 HR.

Starters

Braxton Garrett (8): Garrett was effective last season (3.58 ERA, 9.2 K/9) and is now back in the rotation. He is messing with his pitch mix some by featuring his sinker more (23% to 35%) and not his four-seamer (25% to 11%). His only swing-and-miss pitch is his slider with a 26% SwStr%. The only issue is if he’ll remain in the rotation when Johnny Cueto returns from the IL after a minimum stay.

Bryce Elder (8): Elder has one of the nicest two-steps this week (vs CIN, @ KC). While he struggled in the first half of last season, he came out lights out in the second half (2.31 ERA, 9.0 K/9, 2.3 BB/9, 1.00 WHIP) with some changes (ditched cutter, added four-seamer). In his first start this year, he nearly doubled the use of his slider (27% to 41%) and cut his sinker usage (43% to 28%). His slider has been his best pitch over the past two seasons (16% SwStr%). He might end up as bench streamer.

Matt Strahm (8): I think Strahm was a reasonable gamble for his two-start week (vs MIA, @ CIN). He is transitioning for long reliever to starter. In his first official start, he threw 60 pitches. Hopefully he can get to 75 and possibly a Win.

He’s added a cutter (sometimes labeled as slider) and it gives him a two good non-fastballs.

It might be the time to add him on the cheap, especially if he shoves in his two starts this week.

Kris Bubic (7): Bubic got a ton of hype yesterday after allowing just two hits over six shutout innings. The reason everyone was after Bubic was because he hit the trifecta of pitcher improvement:

  1. Fewer walks. After posting a 4.0 K/9 or higher in his first three seasons, he just has 1 walk in 11 IP so far.
  2. More velocity. His four-seam velocity is up over 1 mph.
  3. Improved pitch mix. He’s not throwing his fastball as much (51% to 40%) and added a good slider (126 Stuff+) with already good changeup (27% SwStr%). The big improvement this season is the addition of a slider (14% SwStr%).

It’s tough to know where is new talent level will stabilize but everything is pointing up.

Wade Miley (7): He has a two step at Arizona and at San Diego. I just wasn’t going to take a chance with him even though he allowed no runs in his first six-inning start. His fastball clocks in at just 89 mph and a changeup is his out pitch. I guess he’s a fine value play with a wide range of outcomes.

Hunter Gaddis (6): Gaddis is an extreme flyball pitcher (21% GB% in the majors, 29% in AAA in ’22). His strikeout (6.9 K/9) and walk (3.2 BB/9) aren’t great and he faces the Yankees and Cole this week. The only reason to see rostering him would be his two start week in two weeks when he faces Detroit and Miami.

Chris Flexen 플렉센 (5): He is in Seattle’s rotation and has used his flyball nature (34% GB% over the past two season) to get easy outs to keep his ERA (3.68) way under his ERA estimators (4.55 FIP, 5.09 xFIP).

Relievers

Miguel Castro (5): Seems to be in the mix for Saves in Arizona.

Players Added in NFBC High-Stake Leagues
Player Adds (9 leagues)
Francisco Alvarez 9
Akil Baddoo 9
Braxton Garrett 8
Bryce Elder 8
Alec Burleson 8
Matt Strahm 8
Kris Bubic 7
Stone Garrett 7
Matt Vierling 7
Gavin Sheets 7
Franchy Cordero 7
Wade Miley 7
Alex Call 7
Rob Refsnyder 7
Luke Raley 6
Hunter Gaddis 6
Adam Frazier 5
Kevin Kiermaier 5
Chris Flexen 5
Miguel Castro 5
Carlos Santana 5
Chas McCormick 4
David Villar 4
Edmundo Sosa 4
Chris Taylor 4
Brad Keller 4
Andrew Chafin 4
Rodolfo Castro 4
J.D. Davis 4





Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
luke
1 year ago

The name “Big Kid Adds” is a little bit funny, but FanGraphs readers are pretty smart and even the managers in my league who don’t read FanGraphs but have been playing in our dynasty league for 23 seasons have been on a lot of these guys already.

So I just don’t think it actually makes sense in this context. Maybe on a yahoo board or in major media outlets advice pages, but really?

Last week a commenter called it “obnoxious” and I won’t go that far, but it sure is a bit clueless about the audience here.

balancedman178
1 year ago
Reply to  luke

I am generally disappointed in Fangraphs content for the last couple months. Zimmerman being pretentious, and a weird focus on hyper specific position articles when “Tell me who to pick” articles in roto would do better.

Years ago, I proposed to FG a series on who to pick who they felt would surplant opening day starters. Wonderful!

Ive suggested numerous articles of a similar nature. Instead we get list after list of rankings. So many rankings.

Villarghmember
1 year ago
Reply to  balancedman178

Yes, enough with the hyper specific articles. More of MY specific article suggestions.

Jason Bmember
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

So are we getting the smart horse article or no?!

dezremember
1 year ago
Reply to  balancedman178

Personally, I find utility in the reasoning / process behind the player picks presented in these posts, not the picks themselves. And I HATE when readers just demand to be told who to pick up. Use the context to do some light research on your own and make informed decisions. Naming Kris Bubic isn’t as important as the factors that lead to him being named…fewer walks, better pitch mix, etc. – now you go find someone who fits the bill, and voila! He’s not giving you a fish, he’s teaching you how…

Thanks for the work, Jeff!

Keith Hernandez' catmember
1 year ago
Reply to  dezre

Yes, exactly

Charlie Hustlemember
1 year ago
Reply to  balancedman178

Readings some of these comments, I wonder if some of the readers do not understand what Jeff is even writing about.

I am baffled that people find the title “Big Kid Adds” to be obnoxious. It is a reference to fact that this list is generated by the solely by the adds in leagues with a $2500 to $15000 entry fee. He is not mocking actual children or plus-size baseball players. He is not putting out a list of players that he thinks “big kids” fantasy baseball players should be adding. He is merely informing you of who the high stakes managers are adding. He critiques these adds, stating whether or not he agrees with their picks, But these are not meant to be his personal recommendations. If you seek those, you should read his weekly “Waiver wire and FAAB Report” in which he ranks all waiver wire players (defined in the article) in order of his personal preference.

I feel confident that the people who play in these “High Stakes Leagues” are not offended by the title of this article, which begs the question why would anyone else be? Would you really be happier if he called it “High Stakes Adds”?

Finally, are people seriously complaining that some of these players are already know in their home leagues? Really? This is a list of players that are being adding in a particular type league, and there is no flexibility or discretion in the accurate reporting of such list. Either you find the information useful or you don’t. If you believe the people who play in these leagues are not making useful or astute adds, perhaps you should complain to them. If you don’t care about who these people are adding, you need not read the article. But you should realize that there are readers out there who seek out lists of players being added and appreciate knowledgeable insights and critiques of these players.

Ken Erdedymember
1 year ago
Reply to  Charlie Hustle

This, 100%. Jeff has been writing this column, under this title, for at least 2 if not more seasons, and the origin of the title is spelled out every week in the 1st paragraph. It’s a concise and tongue-in-cheek way of saying, “Here’s who the high-rollers are adding, and since they’ve got so much skin in the game it’s probably worth giving at least a passing thought to who they’re adding and hypothesizing why they might be doing so.”

As I have less and less time for fantasy sports, I’ve narrowed down my reading to the best. And that’s Jeff and Eno.

luke
1 year ago
Reply to  Ken Erdedy

Eno has actionable intelligence. Jeff is a great writer too. I said nothing about him being bad at anything. I think the title is dumb.

Last edited 1 year ago by luke
luke
1 year ago
Reply to  Charlie Hustle

lol could you be more clueless? Of course the ones being called big kids aren’t offended. Your inability to even understand my complaint shows what little kids are reading this.

The idea that you have to wager huge money to BE a big kid is what I find offensive. Gambling is a societal illness and I’m proud of my 19 thumbs down for this. Clearly I underrated the childish nature of the kids reading FanGraphs and their desire to be talked down to.

Last edited 1 year ago by luke
montrealmember
1 year ago
Reply to  Charlie Hustle

Well said and very true. I play in a couple of these and are not offended by the title at all. The info is valuable and lists are always appreciated. Well done Jeff.

Man Children Sports
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeff Zimmerman

Yes, but if it’s horse crap advice from the world’s smartest horse…if only we knew who that was!

loria_estefanmember
1 year ago
Reply to  luke

what an absolutely bizarre thing to get upset about