Buying Generic: A Tale of Two 3B
Many times in life we convince ourselves to spend money on name brand items. The impact of this can be extremely wide ranging – look at the choices people make for where to attend college, what car to drive, what clothes to wear, or even what food to eat. Regardless of the area of life in which these choices are present, it is hard to ignore the impact that branding has had on our culture. While the choice to spend money on name brand items can be conscious or subconscious, it is usually extremely difficult to seperate out the inherent biases that people have toward specific products. (Try convincing a Pittsburgher they don’t need Heinz ketchup for example).
This brings me to Ottoneu. If someone asked me how to succeed at the format (besides knowing the rules well) I could go into any number of nuanced strategies that could helps someone be successful, but if I had to boil it down to an oversimplified piece of advice, I would probably tell them to “Buy the same things as other teams, while spending less money” or to rephrase, try to ignore the name brand items and buy generic instead. Today, I want to look at a name brand item I see within Ottoneu, and a generic item I would be just as happy with.
Name | G | PA | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | wRC+ |
Mr. Name Brand | 141 | 555 | 10.30% | 26.50% | 0.267 | 0.297 | 0.251 | 0.330 | 0.517 | 0.354 | 115 |
Mr. Generic | 61 | 238 | 4.60% | 19.30% | 0.218 | 0.345 | 0.307 | 0.342 | 0.524 | 0.366 | 134 |