Are 2018’s Breakouts This Season’s Busts?
A year ago during Fantasy Baseball Week at The Hardball Times, I researched whether last season’s breakouts were solid investments the following year. Spoiler alert: they are actually terrible investments. Of course, that’s as a group. That means that not every breakout from the previous season is going to fall flat the following year. So let’s discuss some of the big breakouts from 2018 and decide whether each ends up as part of the poor investment bust group or they hold onto their gains.
I excluded pitchers from this analysis, since we could more easily discern between those who were the beneficiaries of excellent fortune (Dereck Rodriguez) and those whose skills surged, supporting the breakout (Patrick Corbin). I also excluded hitters coming off injury in 2017, those that have shown this kind of performance in the past (you can’t break out more than once!), hitters who recorded fewer than 300 plate appearances in 2017, and hitters who were already really good, but took things up another notch (Mookie Betts, J.D. Martinez).
In order to avoid overly punishing a hitter for being putrid, as opposed to simply bad, I changed any hitter’s end of season (EOS) $$ value to $0 if it was in the negatives. I don’t care whether Chris Davis “earned” -$15.40 or -$3, it’s all the same — he hurt your team!
Finally, I needed to create criteria on how to define “bust”. I ultimately went with a 20% decline in EOS $$ for 2019 as the benchmark. If I believe the hitter will earn that much, I’ll deem him “REAL”. If I think he’s likely to fall short of that earnings level, I’ll deem him “BUST”. Note that I am completely ignoring ADP, as that’s very league dependent.
There are a whole lot more breakouts than this, of course, but we’re going to discuss seven of the biggest.
| Name | 2018 EOS $$* | 2017 EOS $$* | Diff | 20% Decline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Story | $35.10 | $4.40 | $30.70 | $28.08 |
| Christian Yelich | $44.30 | $18.90 | $25.40 | $35.44 |
| Javier Baez | $34.50 | $9.90 | $24.60 | $27.60 |
| Jesus Aguilar | $21.10 | $0.00 | $21.10 | $16.88 |
| Jose Peraza | $15.60 | $0.00 | $15.60 | $12.48 |
| Stephen Piscotty | $14.40 | $0.00 | $14.40 | $11.52 |
| Alex Bregman | $28.10 | $14.20 | $13.90 | $22.48 |
Story actually posted a nearly identical wOBA during his 2016 debut, plus a higher ISO and HR/FB rate. So this breakout wasn’t driven by stronger offense, but rather fueled by two other primary factors — a full season’s worth of PAs and going gung-ho on the bases. Story had stolen 23 bases in the minors twice before, so this wasn’t completely out of nowhere after just seven swipes in 2017. You may not have realized this, but Story is FAST. He actually ranked 17th in Statcast Sprint Speed last year. But it’s a bit surprising to see a hitter steal so many bases on a team that plays half its games in one of baseball’s most hitter friendly venues (though obviously it’s been done before).
I think there’s a real risk of regression in strikeout rate after such a dramatic improvement, plus a decline in steals despite elite speed. That said, there’s not a whole lot of downside when hitting in the middle of the order and playing half his games at Coors.
Verdict: REAL
Who would have ever guessed that Yelich would post the third highest HR/FB rate going back to 2002, which is as far back as our batted ball data goes?! The amazing thing is that his 35% mark only resulted in 36 homers, even with a better than league average strikeout rate. That, of course, is due to his pathetic fly ball rate, which sat at just 23.5%, hilariously representing the second highest mark of his career.
The knee-jerk reaction to that HR/FB rate spike is to expect regression…and lots of it. But what if I told you that he led baseball in xHR/FB rate, barrels per true fly ball rate, and average fly ball distance (among full-time players)? Would that make you think twice about auto-regressing his power? Even if his HR/FB rate and homer total do decline, he’s a BABIP machine and is a lock to lift your batting average.
I don’t think he quite reaches that 20% decline dollar value, as even though the power was supported by the skills, I highly, highly doubt he could repeat those skills.
Verdict: BUST
I think most expected an offensive explosion from Baez one of these years, and it came during his third season. The difference here was an every day job for a change, more than doubling his stolen base total, and boosting his HR/FB rate for a second straight seasons to get over the 20% hump.
On the downside, his plate discipline remains atrocious and he posted the second highest SwStk% among qualified hitters. The only reason that didn’t lead to a significantly higher strikeout rate is because he just kept swinging and swinging and swinging until he finally made contact. His Swing% ranked second among qualified batters.
I think there’s some real downside risk in his BABIP, which would take down his batting average, his poor basestealing success rate raises the risk of a stolen base decline, and man, that plate discipline is downright ugly, making me nervous that pitchers adjust and throw him nothing good to hit.
Verdict: BUST
This was less of a breakout and more of a first extended opportunity for a late bloomer to prove his worth. And boy did Aguilar prove it. I don’t care about his weaker second half as split stats have failed to prove predictive. He has always hit in the minors, though never with this much power, and nothing that he did appears fluky.
My only concern is that a long slump could give Eric Thames another chance to take back his job. Thames is no bench player and more than good enough to hold down first base all season long.
The real problem here is that without stolen bases or the likelihood of a strong batting average, the bar is high when you’re primarily a homer and RBI guy. With strong fantasy competition at his position, it’ll be hard to earn nearly $17 without coming close to a repeat.
Verdict: BUST
So Peraza broke out last year (well, at least in fantasy leagues, as his wOBA was still a weak .319), but it wasn’t driven by what we would have expected, steals. He actually stole the same number of bases as in 2017 over 165 additional plate appearances. Instead, he nearly tripled his home run total, moving him from the limited power/good speed category into the power/speed blend group. I didn’t see that coming. In his entire minor league career, he hit just 11 homers!
Sadly, not only does xHR/FB rate suggest that his career high HR/FB rate wasn’t real, but his fly ball rate also spiked to above the league average. That’s not what you want from your speedy middle infielder with little power. So don’t think another double digit homer mark is a guarantee.
Lastly, he’s going to be stuck near the bottom of the order, capping all his counting stats. He’s not scoring 85 runs again. So owners have to hope he continues to contribute in batting average, which I believe he will, and suddenly remembers his minor league running days and picks up the stolen base pace, which is hard to project.
Verdict: BUST
After three straight seasons of underperforming his xHR/FB rate, Piscotty exploded, as his results finally matched the underlying skills. There was really nothing fluky I could point to as a reason for regression. Of course, since this was his so-far career year, the prudent move would be to expect a bit of regression.
The concern is that he doesn’t steal bases and has been rather neutral or majorly negative in batting average. xBABIP hints at some BABIP upside, though, which could offset any HR/FB rate loss. I think any regression he experiences will be marginal and he’ll still be able to reach that fairly modest earnings level.
Verdict: REAL
The former top prospect made good on his promise in his second full season. The most impressive thing here wasn’t his homers and power, or the steals he pairs with it, but rather his contact ability. He posted the second lowest SwStk% among all qualified hitters and ranked 12th in strikeout rate among 140 hitters. When you combine that contact ability with the rest of his ample skill set, there’s no way else to react than to drool. It’s just an awesome profile.
And the power of fly balls is on full display here (well, and strikeout rate), as Bregman hit just five fewer homers than Yelich with a HR/FB rate less than half. That means there’s a whoooooole lot of room for growth and 40 homers wouldn’t be crazy. In fact, according to my projections, just a 19% HR/FB rate would result in 40 dingers.
Yes, you have to figure some regression here and there, but even with the assumption of regression, he remains an elite fantasy hitter with a genuinely high ceiling.
Verdict: REAL
Do you think these 2018 breakouts repeat or go bust? Which other 2018 breakouts do you have a strong opinion on?
Mike Podhorzer is the founder of ProjectingX IQ, an advanced fantasy baseball analytics platform that transforms projection data and in-season performance signals into actionable intelligence. He is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.
Bellinger: 2019 closer to 2017 or 2018?
My opinion is pay for 18, hope for 17. There is a good deal of swing and miss to him, and the 45 hit tool he carried in the minors means the power really might be exploitable for pitchers. I think he can do better than 25 home runs, but I’d be real surprised to see 39.
I’m at 30 homers, so better than 2018, but still closer to that season than 2017.
Surprised Muncy didn’t make the cut for this piece…
Love that display name! Very clever.
Cause everyone knows he is FOR REAL
Didn’t have enough plate appearances in 2017 to compare. By my definition, he wouldn’t qualify as a “breakout”, but rather surprisingly amazing. Like, a rookie can’t break out since it’s his first year. You have to break out from a previously established level of performance which Muncy didn’t have (I know he wasn’t a rookie).
It’s worth noting that pitchers already throw Baez junk, seeing as he had the third lowest zone % against last year and the 11th lowest in the last 100 years. I’m not sure how much more junk they can throw him.
The 100 years sounds impressive but the plate discipline numbers only go back to 2002 🙂
To piggy-back on what you posted, there are 2,542 qualified player-seasons since 2002 and not only does 2018 Baez have the 11th lowest zone%, he has the 8th highest OSwing% at 45.5%. He also has the 12th highest OSwing% with his 2017 season. He didn’t have enough PA in 2016 to qualify but his 2016 would have been the 32nd highest.
Meanwhile, his overall swing% is the 47th highest at 57.7% while his SwStr% is the 6th highest.
Along those same lines, he faced the 17th fewest fastballs and the 5th most sliders of those 2,542 player-seasons.
I kind of have to agree – pitchers are trying to throw him junk and he just kept mashing everything last year. Man is his profile a jumble of extremes.
Be interesting to see if he can keep it up this year. I’m probably going to let someone else find out if he can. . . .
Yeah sorry, I should have clarified that I just did 100 years for the sake of clearly including all available data. Obviously only the recent data would be particularly relevant, even if older data were available.
Our dearly departed Jeff Sullivan wrote an article late last season about Javier Baez and his swing rate… (R.I.T.B)
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/some-of-my-favorite-javier-baez-statistics/
Yeah, he’s a crazy outlier. Makes him quite the risk. Ironically, I drafted him 25th overall in TGFBI. Proves that for me, everyone has a price, and I thought that was a fair enough discount.
I was curious since his plate discipline numbers are so extreme so I went to b-ref’s PI and searched for guys who had fewer than 30 BB and more than 160 K. Here’s the list (in order of HR hit):
2018 Baez (167 K and 29 BB BTW)
1977 Butch Hobson
2017 Matt Davidson
2017 Tim Anderson
1984 Juan Samuel
Bump it to 40 BB and you add the following:
1996 Henry Rodriguez
1987 Cory Snyder
2012 Chris Davis
1989 Bo Jackson
2017 Adam Duvall
2017 Rougned Odor
1986 Jim Presley
2017 Mike Zunino
2014 Marlon Byrd
2001 Jose Hernandez
2017 Tim Beckham
2017 Keon Broxton
1990 Andres Galarraga
Gotta say, outside of Galarraga that is not a very impressive list (& what was up with 2017?). Not a lot of guys that went on to have even good careers, let alone many seasons like the one Baez just had. I think I’m way out on Baez. . . .
I don’t like the way you came to a conclusion about breakout players being mostly busts. It’s good that you looked at the ADP/EOS data for the breakout players, but you should have looked at it for non-breakout players too. The breakout players had an ADP of 102 in Year 3, and an EOS rank of 189. What about a similarly sized group of non-breakout players with an average ADP of 102? What was their EOS rank?
So, I just did a quick study similar to yours from last year. Looking at 2018 ADP vs EOS, I’ve taken the average of 30 players closest to an ADP of 102 (ranked from 88 through 117). I didn’t select for busts, or breakouts, or anything. This is straight-up guys picked with that average ADP. I also capped the EOS Ranks at 400, so anybody above 400 I gave them a rank of 400 so as not to skew the data too high (same as you did, I believe). Those 30 players had an average EOS Rank of 187 (177 for hitters, 201 for pitchers). In your study, you found that the the breakout players with an average ADP of 102 ended up with a 189 EOS rank (180 for hitters, 214 for pitchers). So it would appear, based on this, that the busts you tested were completely in line with what we would expect any player taken in that range to perform, breakout or otherwise.
I probably should have posted this on the article from last year but I must not have read it at the time. I think it’s important for people to see, though.
IOW, good-not-great players all regress, regardless of what they did 2 years ago?
No, regression is a separate issue. Regression is taking a player with an end-of-season ranking of #55 overall and projecting him as the #102 overall player. Which, as we can see from the linked article, is exactly what people are already doing. It seems the breakout players are being properly regressed, on aggregate, by NFBC participants. When that player with a 102 ADP ends up as the 189th best EOS, that’s not regression to the mean.
As an example, David Peralta had a breakout last year and was ranked 57th overall EOS. He’s being heavily regressed, as indicated by an NFBC ADP of 146. He will still likely finish worse than 146th in EOS ranks, because there are a huge number of people behind him ready to pass him, and not a whole lot of people ahead of him that he can likely pass. The problem is we don’t know which players after him will be the ones to outperform him, but there are hundreds who could do it given the right opportunity/luck/etc. That’s why the higher you’re drafted, the more likely you are to finish with a worse rank than your ADP. Only 2 players drafted in the top 15 last year returned top 15 value; Betts and Scherzer. That doesn’t mean first rounders are a terrible investment, because the same is true for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th rounds, etc.
Mike, can you do it the other way? Hitters who lost a lot of value in 2018 and whether they bounce back?
You betcha, coming tomorrow morning!
Marcell Ozuna’s 17 breakout seemed like a bust waiting to happen, but his 18 seemed to be a bit too low. What are you paying for him to do this season?
I called his bust in last year’s Breakout to Bust article. I’m projecting 26 homers, so only a slight improvement from 2018. The shoulder is a concern too.
Curious to see this exercise with David Peralta. Looking at early ADP it seems most people aren’t buying his breakout at all.
Good – more shares for me!
xHR/FB rate was 18.6%, a spike from 2016 and 2017, but still not quite as high as his actual mark. I’m essentially projecting him in between 2017 and 2018, which actually makes him overvalued.
Christian Yelich stopped caring what anyone thinks about his launch angle/flyball rate. He is a machine – hitting missiles from foul line to foul line. He’s a hit before power guy who’s power keeps growing. I’ll take that profile any day. Even with some give back, he’s got an extremely high floor with upside.
He’s only a “bust” in this article because the level he was at last year simply isn’t sustainable. It is not because he will be bad. I am not sure what “who is power keeps growing” means, so I can only make snarky grammar comments about that.