Which Starters Have the Most Above-Average Pitches

Yeah but does he have a change-up? That’s a great question for Odrisamer Despaigne, for example. Dude threw an 87 mph slider and a slow 67 mph curve after his excellent 92 mph sinker, which sounds good until you realize his command should be exposed in the future (too many arm slots, too many minor league walks) and when you see that the curve and slider got two whiffs combined (42 thrown!) and the change was inconsistent and ranged from 75-88 mph (!) even if it got two whiffs (12 thrown). Strange to see a rookie throw more breakers than fastballs (24), too.

So which pitchers have the full monty? Which pitchers have the most above-average pitches? Now, thanks to Jeff Zimmerman, we can quantify that. Using the pitch type benchmarks I have for swinging strikes here, and ground balls here, we can decide if a pitch is above-average in those two ways. Using Excel, we can then sort for the most number of pitches that meet our benchmarks.

Boom. Felix Hernandez has the most number of great pitches. Feels sorta good to write that.

Pitcher Count All Plusses Pitches Plus CU SI FT FF CH SL FC
Felix Hernandez 4706 10 4 2 2   2 2 1 1
Jaime Garcia 1361 9 3 2   2 1 1 2 1
Matt Harvey 2692 9 4 2   1 2 2 2  
Johnny Cueto 2533 9 3 1   2 2 2 1 1
David Hale 907 8 3 2   2 1 2 1  
Cliff Lee 4320 8 3 2     1 2 1 2
Wade Miley 4623 8 3 2   2 1 1 2  
John Lackey 4306 8 2 1   1 1 1 2 2
Homer Bailey 4703 8 3 1   2 1 2 2  
Sonny Gray 2421 8 3 2   2 1 1   2
Yordano Ventura 1427 7 2 2   1 1 2   1
Marcus Stroman 510 7 2 1     1 1 2 2
Dallas Keuchel 3923 7 2 1   1 1 2 2  
Matt Shoemaker 741 7 3 1       2 2 2
Gus Schlosser 142 7 2 2   1 2 1 1  
Taylor Jordan 1173 7 2 1   1 1 2 2  
Gerrit Cole 2928 7 2 1   1 1   2 2
Garrett Richards 3711 7 2     2 1 1 2 1
CC Sabathia 4119 7 2   2   1 2 1 1
Ivan Nova 2405 7 2 2   2 1 1 1  
Yovani Gallardo 4450 7 1 2   1 1 1 1 1
Charlie Morton 3098 7 2 2 1 2 1 1    
Gavin Floyd 1181 6 2 2   1   1   2
Matt Harrison 530 6 2 2   1 1 2    
Kris Johnson 273 6 3   2     2 2  
Carlos Carrasco 1486 6 2 1     1 2 2  
Clayton Kershaw 4136 6 2 2     1 1 2  
Edwin Jackson 4257 6 1 1 1 1 1   2  
Dan Straily 3068 6 2 1   1   2 2  
Francisco Liriano 3712 6 2     1 1 2 2  

That first column counts how many benchmarks were met. Felix Hernandez has a nice slider and/or cutter by whiffs, but they don’t meet the ground-ball benchmarks (if they are even two pitches), so that leaves him with four good pitches (a pitch gets a ‘two’ if it’s above average in whiffs and grounders). Only Matt Harvey matches that feat in all of baseball over the last two years, so, yeah, those guys are good.

Let’s look at some of the surprises on this list. Jaime Garcia has always been a favorite of mine from a stuff angle. His change-up, slider and curve are all good pitches by swinging strike rate, which is maybe surprising to those that think of him as a ground-ball pitcher. When he was going a little better in his healthier years, his two-seamer got enough whiffs to make him the vaunted four-pitch pitcher. But of course his health is too wonky to ever pin too much hope on him.

David Hale keeps showing up in here as having a good change, sinker, and breaker. That, and his dual pitcher eligibility, is enough for him to hang on to a couple of my deeper rosters despite his inconsistent command and current rough patch. File the name away for spot starting and deep league use at best, though. Wait for yet another Bravo pitcher to go down before doing anything.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Wade Miley will get some love from Jeff Zimmerman in another piece, so let’s skip ahead to the last surprising three-pitch pitcher: Matt Shoemaker. Right now, his strikeout-minus-walk rate far outstrips anything he’s done in the minor leagues, but he’s got two things going for him: a major league job, and three major league quality pitches. His sinker is not great, but his four-seam, slider, and change are all good pitches (and the whiff rates are plus-plus on the slider and change in his short sample). At 92 mph with a change and slider that go around 83-84, the stuff doesn’t look very special, but his off-speed pitches both break in different directions and his command (which has been improving) looks good. I won’t pick him up in a shallow league just yet, but I will go pick him up wherever he’s available in my deep leagues after writing this sentence.

Lower, off the leaderboard shown here, there are is one more three-pitch guys, Masahiro Tanaka, but you know he’s good.

Instead, let’s take note of the strange line of Yovani Gallardo. Only his curve ball rates above-average by both grounders and whiffs. The sinker gets 55% grounders, so that’s good, but no whiffs (3.7%). Same for the four-seamer (45% and 3.4% respectively). The change gets ground balls (58%) but no whiffs (7.4%, 15% is average). Same on the slider (48% but only 11% whiffs). The cutter is probably his slider, but has the same numbers as his slider too. That’s how a pitcher reworks his arsenal to work after losing stuff — Gallardo has the best ground-ball rate of his career. With one pitch that’s all-around good. The arsenal seems to suggest that he can keep up the ground-ball work, for what it’s worth.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Norm
12 years ago

Wonder where Darvish ranks with all the pitches he’s capable of throwing.

Eno Sarris
12 years ago
Reply to  Norm

He didn’t show here because none of his pitches get ground balls. I’ll do one just on whiffs.

cmg8462
12 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

What about additional weighting to swSTR. 1SD above swSTR is a bonus point, GB% leave as is. Guessing under that criteria you would have a substantial amount of the top tier pitchers added to the list who don’t have 3 or less pitches as well as some of the guys who have elite stuff but don’t get a ton of groundballs (Darvish).

Kenny Graves
12 years ago

What about Odrisamer Despaigne. I don’t care what you say yeah he didn’t get K’s he looked terrific for a first start. I am sure he has 2 plus pitches also and should be added to the list.

Jay
12 years ago
Reply to  Kenny Graves

Might go back and try reading the very top of the article.

Proposition Joe
12 years ago

How come a lot of these pitchers are on the waiver wire? What else is missing to make “plus pitches” a good evaluating/predicting tool?

David
12 years ago

Sequencing

Eno Sarris
12 years ago

I’m hoping this is out in front analysis. It netted me Keuchel, Chavez, Whitley, Richards, Arrieta and more this season, for example. Also, I need to weight each pitch — it’s obviously more important if one of your fastballs is good.

Roger
12 years ago

In most cases, command. Sometimes there are issues with approach. Sometimes it’s a matter of which pitches are plus. (A guy with a plus breaking ball and a fringy change is likely to have sharp platoon splits.)

Jeff ZimmermanFanGraphs Staff
12 years ago

They continue to throw a bad pitch too much (see Wade Miley).

cmg8462
12 years ago

Really really hope Matt Harvey comes back strong..

cmg8462
12 years ago

Eno, what about setting the benchmark for plus pitches at 1SD above average? It may separate some of the who are barely clearing the hurdles. Being a tick above average isn’t typically thought of as plus, right?

Eno Sarris
12 years ago
Reply to  cmg8462

It’s a thought, but you won’t get many guys with two amazing pitches, let alone three. If a pitch gets both grounders and whiffs at an above-average rate, I’m comfortable calling it plus for the purposes of this analysis.

Roger
12 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Maybe bonus points for 1SD? A guy with 2 slightly above average pitches is usually marginal for fantasy.

cmg8462
12 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Very cool analysis by the way, always nice to see Felix at the top of a list like this. Also great to see it reveal a few guys you wouldn’t expect.

geo
12 years ago

So dumb question: Where can I find a pitcher’s swSTR% and GB% by pitch type? The player pages don’t show those breakdowns, unless I’m missing it somewhere.

Jeff ZimmermanFanGraphs Staff
12 years ago
Reply to  geo
pepelestat
12 years ago

So, so good article. Went and picked me up miley in my mixed and shoemaker in my AL.

Cee
12 years ago

I’m surprised CC made the list. Guy was horrible when he pitched

Manny Pockets
12 years ago

I’m not sold on the plus pitch criteria. If you have a crazy strikeout rate on a pitch, the ground ball rate starts to become irrelevant (think Chapman, Darvish). Maybe the 1 SD above average idea for either whiff rate OR ground ball rate. If the pitch doesn’t qualify under that criteria, then use the above average at whiff rate AND ground ball rate. I think that will give more realistic results.

Eno Sarris
12 years ago
Reply to  Manny Pockets

Definitely going to try to look at either/ors (swSTR or GBs) and how valuable an elite pitch is. I’m totally sold on using these to evaluate arsenals on a pitcher by pitcher level, but finding out how to make it work in a query is harder.

Herbert Jablonski
12 years ago

Would you recommend picking up Garcia, Miley, Morton, Straily?

Herbert Jablonski
12 years ago

or shoemaker?

Eno Sarris
12 years ago

deep leagues for shoemaker and miley, yes.

Joe Dovola
12 years ago

What’s the difference between looking at “pitch pluses” and “pitch values” (calculated by fangraphs as runs above average)? For example, Jaime Garcia has a +2 on his slider here, yet his pitch value for slider is -0.1. Wouldn’t it be better to look at pitchers that have above average pitches based on pitch values?

Eno Sarris
12 years ago
Reply to  Joe Dovola

Pitch values are the results all balls in play on that pitch (plus whiffs and balls). So it has a lot of BABIP noise and the like. Look at RA Dickey’s fastball. Great pitch type value because batters never expect it. But it’s not a good pitch. By whiff rate, it gets 3% whiffs and 33% ground balls! So peripherals are better because they are like focusing on k/bb — they are the cleanest results. was it a grounder? was it a whiff? those we can measure easily? was it a squibber because the guy was expecting a knuckleball? less easy to measure.

Chris
12 years ago

For plus pitches..or no/weak contact..only including ground ball rate is ignoring the weak contact when the bat is under the pitch.. including infield flies, pop-ups and even foul-outs would fully define “plus pitches”. is it possible to include these? foul-outs is questionable, but considering how little foul ground is available in most parks past the infield statistically it is relevant.