Tim Lincecum’s Change-up is Back

The demise of Tim Lincecum has been greatly exaggerated. He proved as much Saturday, tossing a no-hitter against the San Diego Padres. While Lincecum hasn’t put up vintage numbers, he’s shown big improvements from 2012. At the same time, some of the reasons for Lincecum’s 2012 struggles are still present. His velocity hasn’t improved, and his walk rate is still less than ideal. The main reason for Lincecum’s improvement has been the resurgence of his change-up.

Over his career, Lincecum’s change-up, which is sometimes classified as as splitter, has rated as his most effective pitch. Despite that, Lincecum had relied more on his slider the last two seasons. That worked fine for Lincecum in 2011. Both his slider and change remained effective. Things were much different in 2012. Lincecum’s velocity with his slider dropped from 85.73 mph to 84.03 mph. It wasn’t the same pitch, and was pounded for a -3.3 pitch value.

But that wasn’t the most confusing aspect of Lincecum’s 2012. For whatever reason, Lincecum’s change even worse than his slider. Per BrooksBaseball.net:

Year Usage Velocity Ball Whiff rate AVG SLG
2008 18.37 84.23 37.12 25.12 0.202 0.290
2009 21.27 83.85 31.72 26.59 0.139 0.199
2010 23.03 84.53 30.04 26.19 0.186 0.285
2011 15.35 84.46 41.79 18.98 0.124 0.248
2012 16.05 83.81 42.45 21.41 0.273 0.485

The biggest thing that might explain Lincecum’s hesitancy to use the pitch in 2011 and 2012 is his inability to throw the change for strikes. In both years, Lincecum saw his ball percentage jump above 40%. Lack of command was a larger issue in 2012, as the pitch was pounded for a career-high .273 average and a .416 slugging percentage. Both numbers are way out of line for Lincecum.

That’s changed this year.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Year Usage Velocity Ball Whiff rate AVG SLG
2013 23.07 84.46 30.45 25.74 0.180 0.272

Lincecum has seen the pitch jump back to previous levels. As far as the change-up is concerned, Lincecum’s velocity is back (the same can’t be said about his fastball). Perhaps more importantly, Lincecum has rediscovered his feel for the pitch. He’s been able to throw it for strikes with more consistency, nearly matching his career-best rate in ball percentage. And now that he’s locating the pitch again, it’s become impossible to hit.

That was fully on display Saturday. Lincecum took his change-up usage to another level against the Padres. Of his 148 pitches, Lincecum used his change a whopping 47 times. The pitch had a 34.04% whiff rate in the start, and was thrown over the plate 76.60% of the time. If there was any doubt about Lincecum’s change-up being back, Saturday’s game proved it.

Even though he’s found his change-up, there are still some questions about Lincecum’s performance going forward. For the second straight year, Lincecum’s ERA is about a run higher than his FIP. While that would typically be a reason for optimism, Lincecum’s is still showing troubling signs. His velocity hasn’t improved on his other pitches, and his home run rate hasn’t fully regressed. There’s a chance those issues are related.

Still, rediscovering his best pitch has led to improved performance. For the first time in his career, Lincecum has shown that he can be an above-average pitcher while throwing just 90 mph. His best days may be behind him, but Lincecum’s 2012 struggles seem like an aberration. He’ll have to settle for being merely above-average now, and that’s just fine considering how he looked at times last season.





Chris is a blogger for CBSSports.com. He has also contributed to Sports on Earth, the 2013 Hard Ball Times Baseball Annual, ESPN, FanGraphs and RotoGraphs. He tries to be funny on twitter @Chris_Cwik.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
josh
13 years ago

ouch. i think you may be mistaking his 84mph changeup for his new fastball.

Mat
13 years ago

Seems pretty unlikely he lost 6-7 mph off his fastball overnight.

JY
13 years ago

What does the FB-Change differential look like over this time period? That has to be a big part of the pitch’s effectiveness.

SurprMan
13 years ago

DUSTY BROKE HIS ARM

Kody
13 years ago

So how long before hitters are waiting for the change-up and pummeling it?

Paul
13 years ago
Reply to  Kody

Did you see him pitch yesterday? If commands it like that, no one will hit it.

DoubleJ
13 years ago

Beyond velocity, has there been much change in movement on the change?

RainmakerMember since 2016
13 years ago

I think you’re missing the story on Lincecum. If you look at his peripherals from ’08-’11 and compare them to ’11-’12, the only glaring change looks to be his LOB%. Timmy Jim’s LOB% has dropped 10pts from 77% to 67% and it appears like the 67% is stabilized now after 300 innings at that level.

And it really plays out if you look at his splits with Bases Empty vs. Runners on Base; slash line with Bases Empty = .207/.287/.308 vs. slash with Runners on Base = .285/.368/.449. That split tells me, Lincecum is still an elite pitcher from the windup and has issues from the stretch.

Hence, I don’t think the no-no changes anything. He’s still the same pitcher – he’s going to give too many free passes and is a mediocre pitcher with runners on base. Overall, that is a bad combo for ERA.

speierfuentes
13 years ago

This article just doesn’t address the real question. WHY is Lincecum’s change up suddenly more effective???? Does anyone ever address the WHY? I forgot, it doesn’t matter why on fangraphs. All that matters is the what.

Look the so called resurgence of the changeup is a result of him finding his mechanics again. It’s really that simple. If you’ve been paying attention, it’s been happening for a while now. His fastball, curve, cutter, 2 seamer and split/change have had a renewed crispness to them for more than a month. He was finally able to sustain a repeatable optimum release for an entire game. As Krukow mentioned he’s on top of his pitches now.

So yes his change is effective again. Why? Because he’s commanding everything else. His split/change has always been plus plus. He just couldn’t set it up properly.

If he commands the fastball on both sides of the plate. And 91 is plenty good enough. Then his secondary pitches (which are nasty) become that much more effective. Velocity is not nearly as important as commanding the sharp late action he seems to have rediscovered.

It was on display in spades on Saturday night.

Kevin
12 years ago
Reply to  speierfuentes

But WHY has Lincecum rediscovered the command of his sharp late action?