The Return of Mike Moustakas

If there was one thing that made me sad, as far as the third base position is concerned, in 2016, it was a decided lack of Mike Moustakas. A long-time favorite of mine that had finally established himself among the more reliable options at the hot corner, Moose was only able to notch 113 plate appearances before a torn ACL at the end of May put an end to his season far too early. As we crawl ever closer to the spring, Moustakas’ return is one thing that I’ll be keeping an eye on when the Kansas City Royals arrive in Arizona.

It’ll be interesting to see how Moustakas transitions back into regular playing time at third base after recovering from an injury of that severity. With a shade under eight months of recovery by the time the season rolls around, one would expect that he’ll be back to full strength when the games begin to matter. And given the trends that he was displaying in 2015 and to start 2016, there isn’t any reason to think that he can’t pick up right where he left off and turn in a strong return in 2017.

First, let’s take a look at that ever-so-small sample from 2016:

AVG OBP OPS ISO K% BB% wRC+
.240 .301 .801 .260 11.5 8.0 110

Obviously you’d like the average and on-base to be far higher than each of those respective figures was in that minuscule sample. But don’t forget about the fact that Moustakas posted a BABIP of just .214 across those 113 PAs. And that’s with a hard hit rate of over 37%. The guy just hit into some unbelievably bad luck. But there are some positive trends there as well. For one, his strikeout rate continues decline while his walk rate has been rising steadily over the past few seasons. Perhaps most notably, though, is that power. Even in the small sample, .260 represented far and away his highest ISO in his career, with those seven home runs by the end of May setting him on what would have been a pace toward a new career high in that regard.

There’s plenty to like, even in a sample that small. But the positive trends have been there for Mike Moustakas over the last several years. It wasn’t long ago that many were ready to close the book on his MLB career, at least as a player of any sort of impact at the third base position. As recently as 2014, Moustakas spent time at Triple-A in a season in which he reached base at a paltry .271 clip.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

But this is the dawning of a new era for Moustakas. His 2015 trends, and some of what we saw in that tiny 2016 sample, indicate that big things could be on the horizon for him in 2017. Here’s a big ol’ barrel of those trends in a neat little table:

Swing% Contact% SwStr% K% BB% Hard%
2014 48.3 84.4 7.5 14.8 7.0 31.7
2015 47.2 85.0 7.1 12.4 7.0 31.5
2016 42.1 86.2 5.8 11.5 8.0 37.4

Followed by a neat little graph:

moose

Each figure represents the same trends, just in a different format. But there are some very positive signs here for Moustakas as he moves into the 2017 season. Anytime your walk rates are consistently increasing and your strikeout rates are decreasing, you’re probably in good shape. Not only that, but his contact rate is rising as well. Only three players at the third base position had a higher Contact% than Moose did in 2015, and only two qualifying third basemen had a higher figure in that regard across a full season than he did in his 113 plate appearances.

Say what you want about a small sample size, but there’s something to be said for that type of command of the strike zone as a hitter. Not only has the walk rate improved and the K-rate declined, but we’re seeing it throughout his approach at the plate. Moustakas only hacked at 22.2% of pitches outside of the strike zone last season. Only eight players in all of baseball that qualified posted a lower O-Swing%. And among those hitters, only Ben Zobrist posted a lower SwStr% and higher Contact% than Moustakas did in his brief campaign. Toss in his ability to make solid contact, where his Hard% would have had him 32nd in all of baseball and eighth among third basemen, and there are certainly some elements of his game that favor a true “breakout” for Moustakas in 2017.

One other notable trend? His ability to hit to the opposite field. This was something that was noted with decent regularity during what many considered to be his “breakout” in 2015. That rate went from 21.4% in 2014 all the way up to 27.4% in 2015. His brief appearance in 2016 saw him go for an Oppo% of 30.8%. Even if he didn’t sustain a figure that high for the remainder of the year, it does help to show his development as a hitter, and a willingness to work with those pitches that he can drive the other way.

We’ve thrown a lot out here that featured a small sample size, but when you consider the trends that he displayed in 2015 leading into that appearance in 2016, however brief, it’s hard not to get excited about what Mike Moustakas could potentially be and do in 2017. He’s a guy who has developed as a hitter to the point where he now can control the zone in a way that he was unable to before 2015. He continues to strike out less, walk more, and make solid contact on his way to establishing himself as a true power threat at the hot corner. He’s a very exciting quantity heading into 2017.





11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cliff B
9 years ago

Strikeout rate stabilizes at 60 PA, walk rate at 120 PA, and ISO at 160 AB. His 2016 numbers are a small sample, but they do carry some weight.

asdruballsMember since 2020
9 years ago

An interesting thing about Moustakas’s 2016 season is he played through a hand injury for awhile, before injuring his acl right after coming back from the DL.

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/mlb/kansas-city-royals/article76275162.html

“Moustakas believes he sustained the initial injury April 26 in Anaheim, on a tag play during a 9-4 loss to the Los Angeles Angels”

149 wRC+ from April 3 to 26, 2 wRC+ in the 30 PA after. I mean, this cuts the sample size even smaller then the one discussed in the article, but it feels worth pointing out that his numbers crashed after the initial injury.

fredsbankMember since 2020
9 years ago

“A long-time favorite of mine that had finally established himself among the more reliable options at the hot corner”

He had one good season, powered by a BABIP way out of line with the rest of his career.

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

It’s hard to sustain a .220 BABIP, you know.

fredsbankMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

His BABIP had dropped 4 straight years to that mark, and his career number is currently .266, which is, perhaps not surprisingly, right in the middle of .220 and .296. Basically nothing changed in his batted ball profile from 14 to 15, and his plate discipline numbers and pitch type numbers show that, most likely, pitchers weren’t afraid of him and challenged him more. He got decent results in 15, but whether that was a sustainable, “reliable” thing back then or will be going forward, especially now that he’ll be coming back from so much time off and a knee injury, is hardly so definitive.

dl80Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

I actually agree. His career BABIP is .266, he’s one of the slowest player in the majors, he hits pop-ups at an extremely high rate, and his power is middling. He’s never going to run a great, or even average, BABIP. The year he had a .294 is an extreme outlier for him, the equivalent of a true .300 BABIP player hitting a .340 in a lucky fluky year.

wily moMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  dl80

people can say he had one good season, and it’s technically true, but that’s still the most recent season he’s actually played in, and the theory behind it was that he made a bunch of positive adjustments. that may or may not be what actually happened, but it’s not like he failed to replicate the improvements last year, he just got run over by a car

fredsbankMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

The issue I take is is the claim of suddenly being a “reliable option” after years of not. Surely FG/RG readers and writers know that one good season doesn’t a “reliable option” make.

jim fetterolf
9 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

His spray charts show the adjustment that eyeballs also see. He had been a dead pull hitter forever and after the shifts started he stayed that way for awhile, then adjusted and in ’15 started going up the middle and oppo.

boogshine
9 years ago

The luck factor of high hard hit rate and low BABIP strikes me as an untold story. Seems that could be a trend for hitters like Mark Teixeira who became less effective as shifts became more popular, among other things like age. I would expect pull-happy hitters to hit a lot of hard balls into the shift. That might be worth looking into, because otherwise the phrase “hit ’em where they ain’t” never would have gained traction.

carterMember since 2020
9 years ago

Did the entire website take a break? I have not seen any new articles for days.