Stop Ignoring Cory Spangenberg
Over the last couple weeks, a 24-year-old former top-ten overall pick has been on fire. He has started 13 consecutive games, batting leadoff or second in 12 of those games. He slots in as the No. 6 fantasy second baseman in that stretch. Furthermore, he’s already third-base eligible in Yahoo leagues, making his sixth appearance (fifth start) of the season at third on Sunday.
On the year, this player is now hitting .262/.338/.431, with two homers and four steals. Sounds like a guy we should be jumping all over, right? Would you ever in a million years expect his ownership rates to look like this?
- 6% Yahoo, 3.4% ESPN, 11% CBS
As you may have deduced by reading the headline of this column before clicking on it, the player I’m discussing is Cory Spangenberg. To be fair — as Kiley McDaniel pointed out in his organizational prospect-evaluation column — Spangenberg was a below-slot bonus player, who was a likely first-round talent, but probably not top-ten. Furthermore, he’s never been widely viewed as a top prospect, with the exception of 2012, when he was a unanimous top-100 guy. Still, he’s young, he has some degree of prospect pedigree and (most importantly) he’s producing.
With Jedd Gyorko demonstrating that last year’s .210/.280/.333 was no fluke — hitting an even-worse .212/.280/.318 — Spangenberg has worked his way into a full-on platoon with Gyorko at second. Similarly, Will Middlebrooks has been so stubborn in his refusal to hit the ball — .202/.246/.351 — that both Spangenberg and Yangervis Solarte have been taking his playing time.
Add it all up, and that’s how Spangenberg became an everyday player. Will he remain a fixture in the Padres lineup? I say yes. Middlebrooks was always more of a wild-card signing in the first place, and the Padres only have $541k invested in him. He’s expendable.
As for Gyorko, the team has too much invested in him to give up entirely — he’s signed through 2019, when his backloaded contract will pay him $13 million to fight his annual battle against the Mendoza line. Still, the organization is clearly aware of Gyorko’s limitations, and it would take quite a resurgence at this point to prevent Spangenberg from getting at least a couple starts a week at second base.
He’s not going to hit many more homers, as he hit just 12 in 374 career minor-league games. On the other hand, he stole 104 bases in those 374 games, so Spangenberg should be a reliable contributor in that area. (Those of you in leagues that use net steals might want to be careful — he was also caught stealing 40 times in the minors.)
Spangenberg has enough swing-and-miss in his bat to make me question the sustainability of his on-base skills at the major-league level. However, as long as he’s batting at or near the top of the lineup, he’s going to have a good shot at racking up the counting stats, whether he’s hitting .240 or .280. And yet…nearly no one owns him in fantasy leagues, regardless of format or host site.
Admittedly, the upside isn’t huge with Spangenberg, but he’s getting consistent opportunities and making the most of them. He should be universally owned in NL-only leagues, and he’s an intriguing MI option for mixed leagues as well. Let’s drive up those ownership rates.
Scott Strandberg started writing for Rotographs in 2013. He works in small business consultation, and he also writes A&E columns for The Norman Transcript newspaper. Scott lives in Seattle, WA.
I don’t know, since he started getting regular ABs on 5/3, he has 11 hits but with 7 coming in only 3 games. He’s also 0 for his last 11 with 7 KOs. He seems like the best current choice for the Padres, but probably not in fantasy.
Was considering him, but didn’t have a spot for him until a trade was processed so I got to evaluate him over the weekend. As the above poster mentioned, 0-11 with 7Ks moved me from the “grab him” to “see what the Pads do with him” position.
I think you guys might be putting a bit too much stock into an 11-AB sample.
True, but this whole recommendation is based mostly on the 54 PAs he’s received since becoming a regular, right? It’s a SSS no matter what, I am just afraid the wheels are starting to come off and 0 for 11 with 7 Ks is not a great sign.
No, that’s really not the case. This recommendation is based mostly on his four years of minor-league experience, supplemented by the fact that he’s performed basically as expected since reaching the majors. Spangenberg didn’t just come out of nowhere, he’s been one of the Padres top-ten prospects for years.
This article wasn’t only about his quick start, but it did factor that in. An 0-11 7K stretch hardly dismisses the minor league part of the analysis, but it does seemingly nullify the quick start that the author was referencing. You can wag you finger if you want Scott but I can see where Mr Peepants is coming from.
A hot prospect like Spangenberg could be of some interest in a mixed league as a MI, but one that seems to be cooling or cold has very little appeal. As the author said “and (most importantly) he’s producing”, when that’s no longer true the most important reason you were considering him is gone, based off his own logic.
Sorry if I’m coming across as rude, but I felt like Jon and Peepants deserved to be defended. I really love this site, have for years, the articles are truly informative and their perspective is unique in the sea of mediocre analysis that exists out there.
With that said the pretentiousness towards the readers is something that adds little to the sites value and instead acts as a way to turn off new readers. I know I can’t really do anything about it but I wanted to put this out there.
I think his ownership rate is low because he has a weird name, and it probably carries a negative German stigma along with it. Or is it Swedish? Yes, I’m being surly like a teamster.
Would you say that Spangenberg is a better bench option than Canha at this point, given their respective current trajectories?
Looks like Spangenberg is falling off and Gyorko is getting hot.
Spang or Kang in a weekly points league that emphasizes the hr?