Selling Mike Trout In a Dynasty League
I bought Mike Trout for $10 in 2012. He brought me two top-three finishes in the ottoneu experts league. But I was not up to the challenge, and now he’s $49 and my team is 8th. I see no other option but to sell Mike Trout.
It’s utterly depressing.
It’s also utterly exhilarating.
The packages I’m seeing! They are delightful. I thought I’d break down the two best packages before I hit the accept button. Even if you aren’t in ottoneu, you may find my process interesting. Or abhorrent.
Let’s just look at the offers first. Offer one wants my $4 Ryan Howard and $1 Seth Smith along with Trout, but I’m not actually too torn up about those details. In either case, here are the deals I could get. I have the roster space to accept these deals, but I might have to drop someone like Steve Delabar or Anthony Bass to accept the first. I’ll put my team lineup next to the offers for context.
| Offer 1 | $ | x | Relevant Lineup | $ | x | Relevant Pitchers | $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Fernandez | 8 | C Brian McCann | 11 | SP Masahiro Tanaka | 24 | ||
| Kris Bryant | 10 | C Wilson Ramos | 3 | SP Doug Fister | 9 | ||
| Kyle Schwarber | 2 | 1B Brandon Belt | 10 | SP Yordano Ventura | 7 | ||
| C.J. Edwards | 2 | 2B Jed Lowrie | 15 | SP Drew Smyly | 7 | ||
| Archie Bradley | 3 | SS Elvis Andrus | 24 | SP Scott Kazmir | 3 | ||
| Brett Lawrie | 26 | 3B Pablo Sandoval | 22 | RP Bryan Shaw | 7 | ||
| MI Jordy Mercer | 2 | RP Chad Qualls | 5 | ||||
| Offer 2 | OF Mike Trout | 49 | RP Jenrry Mejia | 3 | |||
| Joey Gallo | 3 | OF Jay Bruce | 36 | RP Sean Doolittle | 1 | ||
| Jonathan Gray | 6 | OF Yasiel Puig | 17 | RP Hector Rondon | 2 | ||
| Mookie Betts | 2 | OF Leonys Martin | 5 | BN Derek Holland | 8 | ||
| OF Marcell Ozuna | 2 | BN Shelby Miller | 7 | ||||
| UT Domonic Brown | 9 | BN A.J. Griffin | 4 | ||||
| BN Nick Franklin | 5 | BN Matt Lindstrom | 4 | ||||
| BN Ryan Howard | 4 | BN Wily Peralta | 2 | ||||
| BN Seth Smith | 1 | BN Lucas Giolito | 1 | ||||
| BN Jorge Bonifacio | 1 |
I didn’t list Dustin Pedroia, because at $44, he’s no keeper. You could probably say the same for Pablo Sandoval at his price, and there might be a non-keeper or two on this list still. But this is the best context I can give you: a team that has some nice pieces at good prices, but is still a middle infielder and a couple pitchers away from contention again. A couple middle infielders?
Of course, neither deal addresses that need, but since I’m talking about building a team, right now, this is about asset building. I could trade further now that I’ve decided to sell — Pedroia can be had for a song, everybody! — and I could create redundancies that allow for more trades even into next season.
One note that is particular to ottoneu before I go into the offers: We have an arbitration system that allows teams in your league to put as much as $3 on the price of a player. That’s how Trout got so expensive so quickly. There’s a non-zero value in keeping Trout to help defray some of the money headed for other well-priced youngsters. With Miguel Cabrera going for $75 last year, Trout’s true value in our league is somewhere around there, minus his future price.
Okay, the offers.
Offer 1
Quantity favors this offer by far. But I’m tempted to not even list Brett Lawrie at that price. But beyond him, you’ve got two nice pitching prospects, two nice hitting prospects, and a young ace that will be $10 as he returns from surgery. That’s a decent package.
Here comes some bad math. I was trying to figure out the bust rate on a major leaguer like Jose Fernandez and I think I can put a number on it. Pitching projections have a year-to-year correlation of about .5, meaning that you could assume that every year, 25% of pitchers ‘bust,’ even ones with major league track records. You’ll probably want to add the 10% failure rate on Tommy John surgeries to get Fernandez’s bust rate. Do you think Fernandez has a 30% bust rate next year?
The other guys are prospects, so we know their bust rates from the excellent work from Chris St. John and Scott McKinney. As a top-ten hitting prospect, Bryant has an excellent bust rate around 37.4%. Amazingly, high-walk, high-strikeout hitters in the high minors see their bust rates drop to around 25% according to St. John’s first method. Given his pedigree, you could maybe push Bryant to a 20% bust rate. His price is high, but an 80% chance of a great power hitter, even in the outfield, is probably worth around $10, especially since he’s up this year or next.
Most of the time, though, I like my prospects to be priced like the rest of the guys on this list. Let’s group the pitchers. Before the season, Bradley was a top-ten pitcher and Edwards merely a top-30 guy, but let’s say their work this year has them both as top-20 pitchers right now. They’d have a bust rate of about 63% each!
Add it all up, and I’d get 1.5 great young cheap pitchers (.7 Fernandez plus .4 Bradley and .4 Edwards) and 1.0+ great young hitters (.8 Bryant plus ? Schwarber) out of this deal. Schwarber might be closer than you think — the team is supposedly considering putting him in left field right now because he’s blowing through the minor leagues. In any case, that doesn’t seem like a lot for Trout, but how many seasons before Trout is at auction cost or worse? Two seasons of Trout for lots of seasons of these guys is interesting at least.
Offer 2
Given my style of analysis for the first, I’m sure you’re ready for the second. It’s probably light, mostly because of quantity considerations.
Yes, I love Joey Gallo like the rest of us. Talent evaluators were telling me on the field, as Gallo launched homer after homer in BP (and broke a car window), that more impressive than his raw power were the adjustments Gallo was making at the plate this year. Given the fact that his walk rate is high, you could give Gallo the 25% bust rate from St. John’s work. But you’d have to at least adjust somewhat for the fact that he was merely ranked 60th going into the season, and also that his STRIKEOUT RATE IS 43.7% RIGHT NOW! Man, that’s high. All of this is guess work — St. John’s second method only found eight comps, and for every Jose Canseco there was a Brandon Wood — but I feel okay putting maybe a 40% bust rate on him. (With a high high ceiling.)
You couldn’t have a more different pair of prospects than Gallo and Betts. Betts was ranked worse going into the season (75th), but had a similar meteoric rise, and has the plate discipline of a prospect with a high floor. Amazingly, in St. John’s study, players with a high walk rate and low strikeout rate in Triple-A had a zero percent bust rate. In his revised study, with power numbers factored in, he rose to around a 23% bust rate.
So already this trade is ahead of the other in one respect. Even if the ceiling is lower on Mookie Betts, he counts almost as a major league hitter next year. Even if we give him a 10% bust rate as a prospect, and then add in the normal hitter bust rate (lower because hitters have a year-to-year correlation of .67 to their projections, so their bust rate is about 16%), you have a guy that’s 75% likely to contribute next year. I might get 1.5 great players from my bad math here.
But then we get to the pitching, and I’d be lucky to get half a good pitcher with just Jon Gray as an input. Even if we call him a top-ten pitching prospect (he was 12th coming into the season), he’s got a bust rate just under 60%. If Offer 2 was beefed up — he does own Tyler Skaggs ($2), Daniel Norris ($3) and Noah Syndergaard ($4) — it could pull even with the other trade. It would probably take Skaggs and Syndergaard to equal the Fernandez, Bradley, Edwards trio.
But say those pitchers get thrown into the second offer… what then? Then I’ve got two trades that, even with bust rates factored in, should net me three young cost-controlled players. That’s a decent return….
Oh wait, the guy with Addison Russell wants in on the discussion.
He’s got a long way to go to match that first offer.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.


OFFER 1 YES
That first package is very enticing.
The original draft was better:
Selling Mike Trout In a Dynasty League
Don’t.
Completely disagree with your opinion, although I respect that it is awesome to own and keep Trout. My disagreement is because his value is at an all-time high. I cannot see him getting better, and in fact he might be losing some value due to not stealing nearly as much as he has in the past. I am not here to say that he is losing value, though. My main point is that his value is extremely high and not likely to get any higher. Sell high. Go out and get an extremely lopsided package with the purchasing power that Mike Trout gives you. Especially if you are not contending or running away with your league.
And especially considering Eno’s rising cost of keeping Trout.
Even if Skaggs + Syndergaard get added to offer 2, I still think offer 1 is better by a solid margin. Bryant and Fernandez >>> Gallo and Gray
Don’t forget the 2nd offer includes Betts too. Depending on how much one likes Betts, one could easily feel Betts + say Skaggs vs the rest of offer 1 easily offsets the diff.
And unless the Otteneu league has high requirements for position eligibility (like default leagues hosted by CBS), Betts will be 2B eligible and might well keep that eligibility even w/ Pedroia around in Boston for a long while.
Just out of curiosity, was Russell Branyan one of the comps for Gallo? I hear about the prodigious power and see that massive K rate and that’s where my mind immediately goes.
Gallo/Gray are very intriguing, but I worry about Gallo even if the power helps even out some of the K-rate.
Jose Fernandez is younger than:
Bryant
Edwards
Lawrie
Gray
He’s basically the same age as everyone else on the offer sheet and he’s been an All-Star, Rookie of the Year, and finished 3rd in Cy Young voting.
The TJ and missed time is a bummer though, but he’s still a potential star.
I like the first offer because I’d rank:
Fernandez (by a mile here)
Bryant
Gray
Betts
Lawrie
Gallo
Bradley
Edwards
Schwarber
That first deal gives you easily the best player of the two offers in #1 Jose Fernandez, and then #2, #5, #6, and #7, #8.
When it comes to hedge against prospect busts, it’s always a good idea to get as many as you can. Gallo has gotta have a high bust rate.
I had Trout in an AL-only keeper league, signed for $18 through 2015. Bad luck and bad signings had me looking at a second straight season far out of the money and I was getting bored, so, since he was the only real chip I had, I pulled the trigger and looked for a trade that would at least put me in the money. I needed saves and SBs and runs, and hoped to offset the huge loss in offense as much as possible.
I netted Joe Nathan, Shin-Soo Choo, and Michael Bourn. It wasn’t the deal I was hoping for, but it gave me a chance to get into the race. However, Nathan is still struggling, Choo immediately tanked, and Bourn got injured. The next best offer I received was David Robertson and Ian Kinsler, and that would have given me better results. But, because I was able to grab Jake McGee and Zack Putnam for saves, it would have been better to keep Trout. I was underwhelmed by the offers, however, and I was able to trade him to a league bottom feeder, so the trade wouldn’t bite me this year in that regard.
Good luck!
What was your budget? $18 for Mike Trout in AL only is a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge steal.
I picked up Mike for $3 3 seasons ago, and at the option year, signed a three year extension, each additional season is $5, for $18 each. Old timey roto rules. He becomes a free agent in 2016 and will be worth about $50.
You’re joshing us, right?
No, he is rolling us.
[IMG]http://www.powerlineblog.com/admin/ed-assets/2013/08/tumblr_m3bpydbjvc1qlar22o1_1280.jpg[/IMG]
This has to be a joke. Those 3 players won’t even come close to replacing Trout’s value this year, let alone actually improving your team.
I was in a similar position with Trout wrapped up at $19 through 2015. I was in second place and wanted to make sure I win this year. So right at the all-star break I traded Mike Trout and a couple other borderline keepers for Pujols, Gardner, Sale, Sanchez, Perkins, and Hammel.
Ah. I see the name now. Nice roll, “Rick.”
Eno, could you move Puig and get a haul and keep Trout? He’s not Trout, but he ought to fetch you some pretty nice pieces in return.
Looking at those two offers I prefer offer 1 by a mile. I think Bradley is overrated so I’d be looking to trade him once the deal went thorugh but I like the assets there. I would not even consider moving Trout for the second offer. I am terrified of Gallo as a major leaguer.
IMO… At $49 he is probably still better off keeping Trout next year than getting either of these packages in return. The first deal is close but I wouldn’t move him for Jose coming off TJ… and you shouldn’t be getting a pile of fringe talent for him, you should be getting talent that will allow you to win next year. Not guys that may or may not be good in 3 years.
You have a keeper league, not a dynasty league.
Really? I get to keep every player I want to keep, depending on cost. I define dynasty as percentage of players kept, how do you define it?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/fantasy/football/2013/08/26/dynasty-leagues-keeper-leagues–fantasy-football/2699177/
Is a good explanation of the differences. But basically, no dynasty league makes a player prohibitively expensive by year 3 or 4.
Also, the first offer is better, and a slam dunk, for just Fernandez.
Or as the article says “Keepers are like living together, Dynasty’s are like being married”. Having to kick someone out after 3 years, is more like the first option.
I can still keep Trout, he would be good for another two years, and then I could even keep him at 75 and nobody would put money on him any more, so I’d keep him at cost. Arbitration in this league is tricky, but I’m not sure I agree with everything in that article.
If offer # 2 is ringing the doorbell, I am not even getting off the couch to answer.
Offer # 1, mind you, is worth looking at given Trout’s rapidly rising price tag and the solid ROI. How long could you keep Fernandez and Bryant for, and at what prices? And Bradley?
Keep forever if I want. Minor leaguers go up a dollar. Major leaguers go up two dollars.
How is this possible? You said during the during the introduction that you bought trout for $10 in 2012, and he’s $48 now.
Have you ever played ottoneu, Keeper? The other league members can increase the costs of your players during the keeper process in the off season.
i prefer the first deal quite a bit
only concern would be taking it and then tanaka needs TJ as well. then you’ve got your two best pitchers coming off surgery for next season
None of these offers are good enough . You don’t need to trade Trout. He is young enough. if it was miggy then it will be a different story.
Agree trading Trout (22 years old) who is almost the same age as those players(in both options) who are unproven at the MLB level is dangerous regardless of the price Trout will cost you in the coming years. Trout is setting out to be the player of the century who will continue to produce video game stats probably into his 30’s. Prospects show up yearly, Trout is a once in a life time.
How deep is that league that you’re in?
1, not close for me.
I like the comment to trade Puig instead of Trout.
What are we pegging Mike Trout’s worth at? You paid $36 for Jay Bruce. Since this is ottoneu, WAR isn’t too far off from fantasy value. Let’s say you paid for a 4 WAR, 2013 Jay Bruce and Mike Trout is 10 WAR. Then we could peg Trout’s value around $72 or so, so even with a $49 price tag you’re still getting him at a discount and he only takes up one roster spot. I don’t see the incentive to move him. Also with ottoneu he somewhat protects you from having Puig’s value raised as quickly, so his value may be more than that.
I agree with this math/thought process. I wouldn’t trade him for an offer I had to think about. Meaning it would have to be a huge win.
If you care for my opinion, both of these offers are very light. If they added in a $20 Goldschmidt or similarly awesome priced established major leaguer to the first offer, you might be making gravy.
Depending on your league type and how you massage your numbers, Trout could be worth as much as $90 in Ottoneu. $60-70 is probably more realistic, but the point is he’s still on a big discount.
Here’s a decent template using Miggy. You should be able to get roughly 1.5-2x the return that I got.
$59 Miggy
$5 Salty
$1 Smith
for
$23 EE
$4 Gattis
Injured players make for good targets as long as it’s the temporary kind of injury.
The first offer is a good deal better. Fernandez (known Cy young contender) and Bryant (arguably the #1 prospect in baseball, especially when you ignore defense) are both more valuable than anyone in the second offer.
I was offered Puig/Stanton/Wainwright for my Trout.
I know seems a simple yes you idiot, but:
5 keeper league.
W/ Trout: Trout, Posey, Altuve, Darvish, Strasburgh.
Without: Puig, Stanton, Waino, Posey, Darvish – Would drop Altuve and Stras, not ideal.
I’m a mid pack team in a playoff league, so it would help me this year. But Not much of a boost next year, right?
I’ve asked this question in the Q&A (thanks for the two helpful responses guys), but I need more insight.
I’d actually drop Wainwright and Posey and keep Altuve and Strasburg. I’d do the deal. Stanton is basically the same player as Trout right now and he has no lineup protection. Think of what he could do with better players around him. Then you get Puig and Wainwright as a bonus.
Extra keepers is a good thing too. You could flip Altuve, Wainwright, and Posey and get back Jose Abreu or some other super stud.
LOL. Forgot how old this blog was.
So what happened? Did you actually deal Trout?
I have Trout in one 18-team, 6×6 ROTO, salary dynasty since he first became available (during a March prospects draft immediately following his real-life June amateur draft). Still have him for one more cheap year before I must either tag him as franchise player and take his real life base salary for 5 more years (or apply this tag a year early to save the extra big $$$ commitment at the far end) or tag him as a restricted-FA to be silent auctioned w/ me able to keep him w/ a matching offer w/ 15% “hometown” discount.
My budget will be $114M next year (w/ $2M/year escalation), and players generally take on real-life base salaries unless they make it to auction whether as restricted-FA or regular FA.
I’m leaning toward just franchising him a year early (like I did w/ J Upton 3 years ago) since I doubt he’ll cost more than the $33M-plus/year as restricted-FA (or probably even regular FA) he’d get 5-6 years from now — that plus the rest of my 40-man roster, especially pitching staff, is strong enough that I shouldn’t lose sleep over using the tag early on him vs on someone like Mat Latos or maybe even Kenley Jansen (who won’t be that cheap anymore).
Even at his eventual $33M/year taking up ~28% of the budget, I should probably be just fine w/ all the cheap, young pieces I have to go w/ the few veteran types — I’ll probably have to let J Upton go in a couple years though, and Ortiz isn’t getting any younger (nor probably Edwin Encarnacion in a couple years). Hopefully, he’ll get back to stealing a bit more to help justify the eventual cost, but he’s just to hard to replace at this point…
No doubt he will eventually leave my team in that league much like Kershaw was finally dealt midseason last year (even in the midst of a relatively tight race that I won w/ help from a cheap Matt Carpenter who I got as part of that deal). But now is not the time by any stretch in this league…
Cheers!
That first offer is quite a bit better than the second in my opinion. Gray, Betts, and Gallo are great, but as a Gallo owner, even I have some concerns about him long-term potential. A package of Fernandez and Bryant (not to mention Edwards, Schwarber, and Bradley too) is pretty enticing and would make me consider dealing someone like Trout. If it was me, though, I would think about unloading Bruce at $36. Sure last year was kind of a fluke for the Reds, but I think you could easily get better value with that.