Quick All-Star Break Study #1: Batting Average Regression

by
July 17, 2024

Over the break, I’m going to run a few quick studies. If you want to request, add it to this Twitter thread.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Someone I know said they drafted for batting average (AVG) this spring, but their team is struggling in the category. They wondered how much upward regression should be expected. This is a simple study with a reasonable answer, some but not all.

Here is what I used from the parameters.

  • Steamer projections from 2021 to 2023 for hitters projected for 300 or more plate appearances.
  • The hitter must have had 100 PA in the first half and 50 PA in the second half. I used a lower PA threshold in the second half to account for survivor bias. Bad performers might get demoted even if they are talented.
  • The standard deviation for the difference is projected at .026 AVG. I used .025 for simplicity and found the hitters who under and overperformed their projection.

The first table shows how much hitters who under and overperformed their batting average projections expected to rebound toward their Steamer projection.

Expected Batting Average Rebound
1H Avg Diff 2H Avg Diff
> 1 SD Exceed 1H Proj .043 .007
> 1 SD Miss 1 H Proj -.042 -.013

The hitters rebound but not all the way back to their projections. A talent change kept them from returning to their projection.

I wanted to see if their strikeout rate or BABIP was causing the dip in batting average. I grouped the hitters who saw a 25-point drop in average into those who did or didn’t exceed their preseason projections.

Hitter Rebound Traits
Proj K% Proj BABIP 1H K% 1H BABIP 2H K% 2H BABIP Count
2H AVG>Proj 21.7% .293 23.6% .256 20.5% .320 59
2H AVG<Proj 20.4% .292 22.4% .251 21.9% .260 100

Both sets of hitters saw their BABIP and K% take a hit in the first half. In the second half, both saw an improvement in K% (not as much for the non-rebounder) but the driving factor behind the batting average bound was BABIP. The overperformers saw a 64-point jump in BABIP while the underperformers saw just a 9-point improvement.

BABIP is the driving force behind batting average missing and with changes to the shift rules and pitcher approach (fewer fastballs), it’s safe to say old rules no longer apply.

While the question on the expected rebound is answered, some but not all, I’ve opened up a whole new inquiry on BABIP regression. Are there traits for hitters who see a different amount of regression? With new metrics and a changing game, I’m going to dive into what someone should be looking at to see if a rebound or a dead cat bounce should be expected.





 

Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

Comments are closed.