Oswalt and Strasburg: NL Starters

Roy Oswalt (Yahoo: 87 percent owned, ESPN: 96 percent owned)

Oswalt’s Sunday start wasn’t good, but neither was it a complete disaster. He allowed far too many baserunners against an offense that hasn’t always punished such generosity, which is why there’s a justifiably fair amount of weeping and gnashing of teeth over what was technically a quality start. Making any sort of grand judgment after one start is foolish — even more so when it’s his first start off the disabled list — but that doesn’t mean there’s nothing to learn from Oswalt’s effort against the Giants.

Matt Swartz noted during Oswalt’s start that the righty’s velocity looked low, which was part of the reason the Giants had little trouble squaring him up. Oswalt’s average fastball velocity this season is 91.2 mph, a full tick slower than it was last year, which is somewhat worrisome on its own. If he drops even further form there, he could be in real trouble. While he doesn’t live or die by high velocity, Oswalt isn’t going to thrive with a fastball that tops out at the same speed he averaged last year.

His drop in speed could well be directly related to his time on the disabled list, so it bears watching in his next few outings as he resumes his normal turns through the rotation. Assuming the Phillies stick to their current rotation, Oswalt should make back-to-back starts against the Nationals, who should provide a fair test of Oswalt’s remaining stuff. The decision to start or sit him is yours, but I’d wait until he’s made at least one more start before dropping him outright.

Stephen Strasburg (Yahoo: 35 percent owned, ESPN: 16 percent owned)

Last summer, as he awaited his call to the majors, everything start Strasburg made was front-page material, and while his rehab starts aren’t generating quite as much publicity, it’s pretty close to the same depth of coverage. His first outing was a good showing; the numbers are pretty much immaterial — ok, getting four of his five outs via strikeouts is pretty nice — it’s the fact that he felt good during and after the start that even borders on relevancy.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

While there’s a good chance Strasburg will see some time in the majors in September, make no mistake, it is not a given that he will. Each start will see Strasburg ramp up his pitch count and if at any point he looks like he’s not coping well with the increase, the Nationals aren’t likely to push him through it. The risk is simply too much greater than the reward at this point in the season, which is big reason I feel that adding him now is prematurely speculative. If he makes 3-4 successful rehab starts, and you foresee needing a spot start in September, then perhaps he bears consideration.

Jordan Zimmermann owners should be especially cognizant of Strasburg’s progress through the minors, as there is a non-zero chance that Zimmermann will be shutdown at around the same time that Strasburg is ready to come up. However, with Brad Peacock already performing well in Triple-A, there’s no guarantee that Strasburg will be the one who replaces Zim in the rotation. As Zimmermann’s cap becomes a more pressing, the situation should become clearer, but if you know you’re going to need to replace one Nats pitcher, there’s a good chance another good option will soon become available to you. It just may not be the one you’re expecting.





Dan enjoys black tea, imperial IPAs, and any competition that can be loosely judged a sport. Follow him on Twitter.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Telo2
15 years ago

Come on D. Wade you are better than this….This article didn’t tell me anything. Especially about Strasburg. Where are the statistics? It is just repeating things that we already know. I was hoping for some sort of proof that Strasburg will be so good that he is worth a pick up now. This one just didn’t do it for me Wade.

Chris Bowyer
15 years ago

The Strasburg thing could use some qualification. I nabbed him because a) I had an open DL slot, and b) people in my league go bananas for guys like him, and there’s virtually no chance I’d be able to grab him after 3-4 successful rehab starts.

Ree
15 years ago

You added Zimermann but threw the link to Zimmerman. I don’t think the right one pitched a total of 12 innings in 1999.

thegeniusking
15 years ago

You may also want to consider that the Nats would love, love, love the extra revenue associated with a couple Strasburg home starts at the end of the season, if he’s healthy, is there any reason to hold him back?

mikey mike
15 years ago

What’s going on with Oswalt and his curveball?

From one of the best pitches in baseball to something he hardly ever uses.

I know his changeup has improved, but has he fallen too in love with it.

UmYeah
15 years ago

Oswalt’s velocity wasn’t really “down” as described in that tweet tbh. It average 91.4 per brook’s baseball’s pitch f/x, topping out at ~93. It may have gone down to 90 once or twice later in the ballgame, but he was pretty consistently at 91-92 through most of his outing. However, he did generally average ~93 earlier in the season when he was pitching reasonably well, so I think that his velocity in his next few starts will tell just how healthy he is.

The drop in curveball usage I think is more associated with coming to Philly rather than anything mechanical. He was throwing it 16% of the time last year before the trade, but 12.5% after the trade and 9.1% this year. It’s probably due to the discretion of Carlos Ruiz not calling for it and using the changeup a LOT more. This might also have something to do with the Phils pitching staff as Roy Halladay’s improved changeup the past 2 years is widely attributed to the Phils pitching coach, Rich Dubee, teaching him a new grip for it, and so it’s possible he did the same with Oswalt.

tdotsports1
15 years ago
Reply to  UmYeah

No offense to Rich Dubee but Roy Halladay has been working on his change-up for about 5+ seasons now, he has just never really gotten comfortable with it in-game until his last couple seasons in TO. Shaun Marcum has one of the great change-ups in baseball and the two of them discussed it a length I am sure.