Auction League “No Scrubs” Approach
Yesterday, I participated in a 12-team NL-only auction league hosted by CBS (full analysis available soon from CBS). To add a wrinkle to the experience, I decided to try to construct an average team. No studs, but especially no scrubs. Just spend as close to $11.3 per player as possible. The main reason for this approach is that I wanted to stay away from the bottom feeders common in “Only” auctions. I was looking for regulars across the board. The strategy fell apart as my fortitude and simple rules failed.
First off, I wasn’t able to do much auction planning since I found out about it less than a week ago. Additionally, I didn’t want to use the traditional spread-the-risk approach of a bunch of $20 players. Mine idea was a No Scrubs approach. With $20 players, several $1 players enter the team. I wanted semi-talented players with jobs for every position.
After creating projections using the SGP method, I had to come up with an auction framework. In their book, Simple Rules, Donald Sull and Kathleen Eisenhardt go over how to create and utilize simple rules. Here their basic premise.
You want to make the rules as simple as possible to increase the odds that you will follow them. You can also limit your rules to two or three … to increase the odds that you will remember and follow them.
All right, I decided to go with just two rules.
- Targets players between $5 and $17 ($11 +/- $6). I would not be able to get every player for exactly $11, so I was going to need some leeway.
- Don’t overpay or reach for players.
I should have known these rules weren’t going to hold up. As the authors of Simple Rules state:
[I]nitial rules are often automatic, obvious and generally weak.
You Aren't a FanGraphs MemberIt looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:✓Ad-free browsing✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles✓Historical & platoon projections✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps✓One-click data exports✓Customizable player-page dashboards✓Dark & Classic site modes✓Weekly Members-only mailbag✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review✓Optional homepage photo removal✓Gift articles to non-members
Well, I did follow one part to a “T” — not spending over $17 — but I didn’t with rest of it. To start the analysis, here’s my No Scrubs team, with scrubs, for reference.
| Player and Position Slot | Cost | Position Eligibility |
|---|---|---|
| J.T. Realmuto C | 14 | C,U |
| Francisco Cervelli C | 5 | C,U |
| Josh Bell 1B | 16 | 1B,CI,U |
| Neil Walker 2B | 15 | 2B,MI,U |
| Jung Ho Kang 3B | 11 | 3B,CI,U |
| Ketel Marte SS | 8 | MI,SS,U |
| Joe Panik 2B | 13 | 2B,MI,U |
| Eugenio Suarez 3B | 14 | 3B,CI,U |
| Hernan Perez 3B | 13 | 3B,CI,OF,U |
| Hunter Pence RF | 17 | OF,U |
| Jason Heyward RF | 12 | OF,U |
| David Peralta RF | 17 | OF,U |
| Austin Meadows CF | 1 | OF,U |
| Lucas Duda 1B | 14 | 1B,CI,U |
| Steven Matz SP | 15 | P |
| Rich Hill SP | 17 | P |
| Shawn Kelley RP | 15 | P |
| Fernando Rodney RP | 10 | P |
| Robbie Ray SP | 9 | P |
| Vince Velasquez SP | 13 | P |
| Tyler Glasnow SP | 8 | P |
| David Phelps RP | 2 | P |
| Josh Hader SP | 1 | P |
| Grant Dayton RP | RES | P |
| Mac Williamson RF | RES | OF,U |
| Austin Barnes C | RES | C,U |
| Seth Lugo SP | RES | P |
| Chase Anderson SP | RES | P |
| Scott Feldman RP | RES | P |
| Chad Bettis SP | RES | P |
Generally, I like the overall team balance but I wasn’t able to stay away from the $1 guys. That was my goal and here’s how I failed my goals.
Failure #1:
I overpaid across the board. While I rostered no studs, my team has a median value of $13. It needed to be $11. Overpaying caught up with me at the end with a $2 player and two $1 guys.
I still have no problems dropping $17 on players, I just need to make sure I allocated $5 for someone else. I didn’t have a structure in place to correctly deal with overpaying.
Failure #2
Middle infielders, especially shortstops, consistently went more than my values. I expected the top guys to go for more but owners were paying a premium penny for the bottom to mid-tier guys. I had to also pay up costing much-needed resources late in the auction.
Failure #3
I let some great deals slip through. My $17 hard cap kept me from picking up some great $18 buys like Eric Thames who went for $17 (valued at $25). The goal is to win and I can’t give up $8 of surplus value on top end players.
It’s time to work on my rules as Sull and Eisenhardt recommend.
[P]eople add rules, cut back, and then maintain a roughly fixed and small number of rules. They termed this simplification cycling. By engaging in simplification cycling, people update their rules for changing conditions while maintaining focus and flexibility by having only a few rules.
Here my new strategy rules to keep the scrubs off my team.
- Create 10 player pairs with each equaling a $22 or $23 total. Additionally, one three-person group will need to be made for the odd number of players. If one player goes over $11, another player must be from what’s left of the $22 to $23. I normally like to use auction tables described in this recent article, but for this strategy use the following table.
| Cost | Cost | Cost | Actual Total | Ideal Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player #1 | Player #2 | 23 | |||||
| Player #3 | Player #4 | 23 | |||||
| Player #5 | Player #6 | 23 | |||||
| Player #7 | Player #8 | 23 | |||||
| Player #9 | Player #10 | 23 | |||||
| Player #11 | Player #12 | 23 | |||||
| Player #13 | Player #14 | 22 | |||||
| Player #15 | Player #16 | Player #17 | 34 | ||||
| Player #17 | Player #18 | (Player #21) | 22(33) | ||||
| Player #19 | Player #20 | (Player #22) | 22(33) | ||||
| Player #21 | Player #22 | 22 |
- Don’t spend over $17 on a player unless it is least a deal with a max bid of $23. If winning an overspend bid, use the three-person group for the overbid. If more than one player is won this way, remove one player pair and create two more 3-player groups. The $23 max bid allows for two $5 bids later.
- Try not to over pay for players but track position inflation in the $5 to $17 range. Usually, inflation happens with the top players and deals will happen around the $10 mark. If the auction prices and personal values aren’t coming together, prepare to overspend for specific positions.
My rules are a little more complex but they give me a better framework to stay away from $1 bids. Additionally, it allows me to break my auction limit if a good deal presents itself. I wish I had a do over on the auction but I will be better prepared for the next one.
Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrLequ6dUdM
Hey Jeff, Sorry I asked this on the Feb 1b Rankings article. Here you are stating you should have gone the extra dollar on Thames to $18 and consider him a $25 value. You had him unranked and he was given a 51st ranking from you. You had Duda at 24th and got him for $14. Is there an error in your 1b rankings, am I missing something?
Hey Jeff! That was a fun draft, I was actually the Kershaw owner (BigThreeSports), and would probably say I went the opposite route you did hahaha
I ended up with 5 $1 guys in my lineup. Paid $42 for Kershaw and had a couple other $20+ guys (Polanco, Piscotty, Freeman). Lot of overpaying for the middle tier (NL only upside) guys late too I noticed among the other owners. I wonder if that affected this strategy at all.
No $ left for me late to aggressively bid and it was killer. Didn’t think guys like Bour, etc would go to $13 and beyond.
Going to be a fun league, best of luck man!
You got Heyward for $12 in an NL only? Wow. Wonder how much the Cubs wish they could do the MLB equivalent. All in all, I like the team for a 12-team NL only. The only one I have issues with is Realmuto at $14, but given that it is a 2 catcher, NL only, I can see that catcher prices could get nuts.
This is great..question, though. Would you recommend the “no scrub” approach in 12 team mixed leagues, or is this only for “only” leagues?
Thanks!
After years of doing auctions, this always feels like you are punting the equivalent of your first 4 or 5 draft picks to double up in rounds 9-12. It just doesn’t make sense from experience, teams that win have stars and get some luck with their lower cost gambles. I have never seen a team who’s best player is 2017 Hunter Pence win a fantasy league. Further, given the star inflation aspect of most auctions, you can usually go stars then still get these types of guys cheap at the end anyway.
I think it depends on the depth of the league–in a 12-team mixed where there are tons of players with starting jobs that go for $1, the no scrubs approach would be silly. However, it makes more sense in a 12-team NL only where guys who play 3 times a week cost more than $1.
Even in a 12 team NL only there are 15 MLB teams in the pool, plenty to have a starter at each position and work with good platoons. Like I said, I have never seen this work, I have tried it years ago after some research suggested $10 was optimal.
The larger problem is that most leagues really inflate at the top, so saving money for $10 guys is a fool’s errand as those guys sell for $5 or less because all the money is spent.
Instead of a straight “no scrubs” team, would you rather have a “no scrubs in my starting lineup” team? I don’t want to spend $3 or $4 on a guy who will ride my bench more often than not. I’ve wasted resources for non-production… Thoughts?
Pirates fan?