My NFBC Draft Champions Review
You have seen some Tout and LABR reviews for the past few weeks here on the site. We all can’t be so lucky to participate in such glorious leagues. On the other hand, we can all take part in NFBC leagues.
NFBC’s $150 NFBC Draft Champions leagues are a perfect format for me:
a) I have impending time constraints including my first child in June!
b) I didn’t have to ask my wife for permission to use our mutual bank account.
c) I was able to dwell on each pick if/when needed (8 hours to make a pick) and
d) There are no trades or free agent pick-ups once the draft is complete. This feature is my wife’s favorite, and I appreciate the preventative collusion measures. I am also much more interested in draft strategy and player projections/rankings/draft position than I am jumping on small sample sizes in-season.
The benefits of this format outweigh the costs for me – the main cost being missing out on certain players (Mookie Betts, Travis d’Arnaud, etc.) and not being able to over-trade for them.
For those unfamiliar with the format, you can review them here. In short, it’s a 15-team, standard 5×5, 50 round snake draft (23 active roster slots: 2C-1B-2B-3B-SS-5OF-CI-MI-U-9P) using Kentucky Derby Style (KDS) draft position preference. I believe I ranked my preference straight 1-8 (Mike Trout to Clayton Kershaw) and then mixed it up a bit. I was awarded the number one pick!
Here are my results up to round 47 of 50 for team Lanolin_LikeSheepsWool:
| 1 | Trout, Mike | OF |
| 2 | Marte, Starling | OF |
| 3 | Springer, George | OF |
| 4 | Kipnis, Jason | 2B |
| 5 | Greinke, Zack | P |
| 6 | Martinez, J.D. | OF |
| 7 | Carrasco, Carlos | P |
| 8 | Zimmerman, Ryan | OF |
| 9 | Bryant, Kris | 3B |
| 10 | Adams, Matt | 1B |
| 11 | Harrison, Josh | 3B |
| 12 | Davis, Khris | OF |
| 13 | Zunino, Mike | C |
| 14 | Odor, Rougned | 2B |
| 15 | Mejia, Jenrry | P |
| 16 | Bailey, Homer | P |
| 17 | Hutchison, Drew | P |
| 18 | Alvarez, Henderson | P |
| 19 | Flores, Wilmer | SS |
| 20 | Lamb, Jake | 3B |
| 21 | O’Brien, Peter | C |
| 22 | Lohse, Kyle | P |
| 23 | Snider, Travis | OF |
| 24 | Lindor, Francisco | SS |
| 25 | Peralta, Joel | P |
| 26 | Greene, Shane | P |
| 27 | Ottavino, Adam | P |
| 28 | Ramirez, Jose | SS |
| 29 | Susac, Andrew | C |
| 30 | Norris, Daniel | P |
| 31 | Delgado, Randall | P |
| 32 | Strop, Pedro | P |
| 33 | Garcia, Jaime | P |
| 34 | Montero, Rafael | P |
| 35 | Burns, Billy | DH |
| 36 | Smoak, Justin | 1B |
| 37 | Kelley, Shawn | P |
| 38 | Joseph, Caleb | C |
| 39 | Gonzalez, Alexander | P |
| 40 | Santana, Domingo | OF |
| 41 | Hatcher, Chris | P |
| 42 | Refsnyder, Rob | 2B |
| 43 | Plawecki, Kevin | C |
| 44 | Cahill, Trevor | P |
| 45 | Aguilar, Jesus | 1B |
| 46 | Barrett, Aaron | P |
| 47 | Delabar, Steve | P |
As mentioned in my previous post, highlighting Two Last Draft Tools, I appreciated the ability to slow draft so that I can evaluate Jeff’s Hitter Analytics (batted ball profiles) and our Arsenal Scores in addition to my rankings (RotoChamp Composites and Baseball HQ rates combined plus NFBC’s average draft position data, which obviously matched the format).
Overall, I am very happy with my active roster and impact from the bench.
Rounds 1-7 – Position Scarcity-schmarcity:
- I went Mike Trout and decided against early position scarcity going with George Springer and Starling Marte back to back on my first turn. After my first three rounds, I was sitting with three outfielders that should net me robust counting stats – perhaps approaching 80 homers and 75 stolen bases.
- The initial results lead me to more balance in the 15hr/25sb potential of Jason Kipnis. I honestly wanted Corey Dickerson here who was still available after 59 picks, but starting off with four outfielders would have been too interesting. I jumped on the opportunity to draft similar impact in J.D. Martinez 30 picks later. Martinez has had an excellent spring and wound up just under Dickerson in the Hitter Analytics matrix I prepared, which was ranked by the expected BABIP with homers and expected wOBAcontact scores that Jeff presented using Inside Edge data.
- I didn’t want to draft my first starter until round eight going into the draft, but after reading as much as I could on NFBC draft strategy, I decided to land one ace depending on the relative value left. I had Zack Greinke as the best available pitcher and player in general when he made it back to me after 59 picks. The Carlos Carrasco pick is based on his glorious arsenal score and knowing that he wouldn’t make it back around to me. I was hesitant, but remember not loving any bats at that time.
Rounds 8-14 – Corner Infielders and Power:
- I was very happy with my results here. Kris Bryant only had one spring homer at the time I believe, but I missed out on the rookie season from Ryan Braun, Ryan Zimmerman and Evan Longoria, and I didn’t want that to happen again. There might be more swing-and-miss to Bryant’s game, but there is even more power.
- I got to supplement Kris Bryant with Ryan Zimmerman at 3B, and I was also eyeing Josh Harrison who I thought could possibly make it back to me based on everyone being scared off by his inflated BABIP, but as you can see in the Hitter Analytics Matrix his xBABIP was right on (first column titled, BABIPdiff). I’m not banking on him offering the same value, but his projections still provided value where I dwelled on him. As you can see, he did make it back around to me so I went with his 10+/15+ potential even if it’s only in 500 PA.
- Matt Adams was a no doubter for me at this point with power flying off the board. If it’s a lefty heavy week impending, I have flexibility once Bryant is up to put Ryan Zimmerman at 1B (or OF) or substituting in Justin Smoak if he finally takes off in Toronto.
- Sticking with power getting plucked up, I went with 50 homers from my next two picks combined: Khris Davis and Mike Zunino. Khris Davis should go 75-25-75 in his age 27 season or somewhere between his 2014 and the wonderful-mystery-kind-age 27 season that Chris Davis had in 2013.
Rounds 15-19 – Sh*t-Show of a closing situation:
- Most teams already had two closers when I went with my first, Jenrry Mejia in round 15.
- I should have probably (definitely) went with Tyler Clippard or Brett Cecil on my round 16/17 turn, but I was too excited with Homer Bailey and Drew Hutchison as my number three and four starters. When I watch Drew Hutchinson pitch, I get that graceful, Corey Kluber feel prior to his release. He doesn’t have the same repertoire potential, but he should be a lock for 185+ K’s and a ERA closer to his 3.60 SIERA last year.
- I would have pounced if either Clip or Cecil made it back to me at 18/19, but no luck. Instead, I went with Felix Hernandez’s Changeup (Henderson Alvarez) and late Nolan Arenado potential in Wilmer Flores. Would he have made it back to me in round 20/21? Perhaps, but I didn’t want to take the chance, and he was already having a great spring.
Rounds 20-21 – Diamondbacks:
- Jake Lamb and Peter O’Brien were both fliers based the bullish reviews at the time. Peter O’Brien has Mike Zunino potential as soon as next year, but might not get the chance based on his defensive woes. The Jake Lamb pick is meh now that Nick Ahmed has been impressive.
Rounds 22-28 – Potential Saves, the Undervalued and Handcuffs:
- Outside, my round 25 pick of Joel Peralta (possible early saves), I was very happy with cluster.
- Kyle Lohse is great value this late outside of his strikeout floor.
- I am sure you read everyone’s bold and ballsy predictions on Travis Snider already? He will continue making more appearances – especially in our Staff Writers’ choices impending.
- Adam Ottavino will show up in the Staff Writers’ choices quite a bit as well. I didn’t want to punt saves. Ottavino stealing/auditioning for the closers role in Colorado sooner than later will help make my punt-or-not-to-punt decision much easier.
- In this cluster, I wind up with my first handcuff. I am pretty happy with my MI situation in Kipnis, Odor and Flores, but there are definitely questions associated with each: back pain from Kipnis, defense from Flores, small sample sizes from Flores and Odor. The order may not be right, but I wound up with both Francisco Lindor and Jose Ramirez. Jose Ramirez was already referenced in my Ballsy Predictions in addition to many others’. I consider myself lucky landing both considering their tricuff with Kipnis.
Rounds 31-34, Shane Greene (round 26) and Trevor Cahill (44) – Arsenal Scores:
- This is where our Arsenal Score will hopefully shine.
- Shane Greene scored 32nd overall and Jaime Garcia was 5th overall for starters. Randall Delgado and Pedro Strop scored quite well for relievers thanks to excellent Sliders and Changeups.
- Trevor Cahill ranks quite high as well. Let’s see if his new delivery (more over-the-top) provides any fantasy value to us. In October, I did point out how good he was when his release point was consistent. When he was “on,” his K-BB% matched Jacob deGrom’s.
Rounds 35-38 – Supplemental Speed and Power and Playing Time:
- Billy Burns good spring, blazing speed and Oakland outfield health concerns was too good for me to pass up. If I lose Kipnis or Jose Ramirez doesn’t translate, I have Burns for easy stolen bases if he plays for an extended period of time.
- Maybe Justin Smoak will breakout in Toronto. 17+ Homers in 400 PA is still valuable at this draft position. I was actually surprised to see him still available. Ben Paulsen, Darin Ruf, Nick Swisher, Yonder Alonso, Logon Morrison, Mark Reynolds, Ike Davis, Jon Singleton and Garrett Jones went one to ten rounds (from Paulsen to Jones) before him.
- Between Burns and Smoak, maybe I squeeze out enough homers and stolen bases to ensure top two placement within each category.
- Playing time at this point was important for me in this cluster. I didn’t want to vulture saves or look at deep prospects until round 40-onward.
- My pick in round 38 came out a good time. I like Susac quite a bit. Check out where he is in the Hitter Analytics Matrix, but between Buster Posey and Brandon Belt (or even Hector Sanchez and a slow start to spring at-bats), there is no guarantee that Susac lands plate appearances. I clearly needed another catcher and Wieters arm issue just resurfaced. Caleb Joseph was an easy decision at this point based on his new projected playing time, decent isolated slugging rates at AA and an excellent August that confirmed some power.
Rounds 39-onward:
- I attempted to handcuff the pre-Kenley Jansen return closer situation in Los Angeles with Chris Hatcher. In a weekly league like this though, it might wind up being a lost cause.
- Domingo Santana‘s and Jesus Aguilar’s power interests me. If something happens to Carlos Santana, I think Jesus Aguilar will provide a ton more value than Nick Swisher at this point.
- Stephen Drew should be a lost cause, which is verified by his 2014 and 2015 spring. Robert Refsnyder should win the Yankees second base job sooner than later.
- Aaron Barrett of the Nats (excellent Fastball-Slider combo with good groundball induction) is a deep sleeper closer threat if Storen misses time for any reason. Steven Delabar has horrible control, but he might be Brett Cecil’s backup, and I am facing the fact that my closer situation is my only real question mark.
Position/Bench Flexibility:
- Jason Kipnis is my only real injury concern offensively at the moment. I can slot Odor at 2B and plug Jose Ramirez in at MI, which will supplement my stolen bases. Francisco Lindor’s arrival will give me another hopefully consistent MI option.
- My corners give me nice flexibility. Harrison is 3B/OF eligible as is Ryan Zimmerman who will also be 1B eligible and can fill-in for Matt Adams in lefty-heavy weeks. This works nicely for whenever Kris Bryant arrives.
- I am also happy with my bench options: Billy Burns at OF for speed; Justin Smoak at CI for power; Andrew Susac at C in case something happens to Posey or even Belt; Robert Refsnyder for when the Yankees realize he should start in place of Stephen Drew; Kevin Plawecki in case d’Arnaud misses time; and of course Travis Snider in case any of my big OF bats miss time.
Closer Situation/Punting Saves?
- My question to you should be an obvious one: what do I do about my closing situation other than hope for an injury or Adam Ottavino to steal the Colorado closing job sooner than later? Do I punt the category? I can’t depend on win projections, but If Jamie Garcia wins the 5-spot in the Cardinals Rotation and Daniel Norris pitches well from the start, I might think about punting saves. I would then have nine very capable starters with some interesting arsenal scores to supplement them in Randall Delgado, Rafael Montero and Trevor Cahill.
What are your thoughts?
Daniel Schwartz contributes for RotoGraphs when he's not selling industry leading thermal packaging. You can follow him on twitter @RotoBanter
I *hate* filling up a position too early, because I feel like it restricts me for the rest of the draft. I like to leave at least one OF spot and the Util. spot open so I can take advantage of a perceived value. That said, this team looks really strong. Wonderful job sir!
Thanksir
This is NOT a good team. Very weak pitching and the second catcher slot has a backup right now.
I agree with mdecav on your pitching. In these leagues, I think it’s OK to wait a bit on starting pitching, but you really need to fill up on SPs in the late rounds for depth so you can play matchups more each week or start two-start pitchers. IMO, you don’t really have the SP depth to punt saves, so you just have to hope that some of those relievers you drafted wind up as closers at some point.
The problem with not drafting saves is that you’ve almost certainly taken yourself out of the running for the overall DC win. It would be a surprise to see you top 30 SV, which will net a couple points in your league but leave you below 75% of the teams in the overall. I hate drafting closers but not as much as I hate being out of it before the season even starts.
This is a well below average team overall. The lack of overall depth on offense is staggering, as this team will be bleeding at-bats all year long through attrition. The starting pitching isn’t nearly good enough to compete, and you punted saves. Better luck next time.
Congrats on the team and the new addition to the Schwartz family, Dan. Jose Ramirez is a fantastic value where you got him. And you got the Lindor handcuff. Well done. Is this the year for Khris Davis? I’m on the fence.
Thanks MB. I think Khris Davis goes 70-25-75-5-260. It’s all up to my pitching luck and speculative saves now.
I have to agree with johnnycuff’s assessment. Considering that part of the draw of participating in this league is in competing for the overall prize pool, you’ve more or less failed on that front. Between the lack of relievers who can compete for saves and the lack of a viable second catcher to start the season, this draft is at least partially a failure, no matter who well the rest of your roster performs.
I can certainly understand the tough decisions that come with drafting in this sort of league though. I’m also currently participating in one of the Draft Champions leagues (4-hour), having picked out of the 13th spot. It’s funny you mentioned the predicament you faced with Bailey and Hutchinson, because I was faced with nearly the exact same decision under similar circumstances. Like you, I waited awhile to draft my first closer in Mejia in round 13, and at the top of my queue were guys like Bailey, Hutchinson, Semien, and Pompey.
The difference for me was that I had already built up a solid base of pitching in Kluber, Wood, Salazar, and Cashner, so as much as I wanted to add another high upside pitcher, the need wasn’t quite so great. As a result, I followed my Mejia pick with Boxberger (14), Pompey (15), and Giles (16). Bailey and Hutchinson were both taken following my Giles pick. It was certainly difficult having to pass on both players multiple times, and I would have if the elite non-closer options weren’t available, but they were, and I couldn’t risk hinging my entire saves standing on a couple of handcuffs. I feel the key to doing well in this sort of league is to have viable depth everywhere so that injuries cannot possible derail you at any specific position or in any specific category. I plan on adding a few more handcuffs down the road.
One interesting thing I noted was how so few of my fellow managers seemed concerned with their second catcher spot. So many seemed perfectly content with drafting a part-time player or a prospect to fill the position, and I just can’t wrap my head around that. After all, isn’t a second catcher spot just as relevant as any other position? I went with D’arnaud (12), Bethancourt (21) and Pinto (24) to assure myself regular at-bats, and that’s half the battle in a weekly 2-catcher league.
Honestly, I feel very fortunate things have turned out so well for me from a saves and catching standpoint. I definitely played with fire waiting so long to fill both needs, and was able to get some of the last viable options before a significant drop-off. A few changes here and there, and I might have not been so fortunate.
Here’s a full list of my picks so far, just to give you a sense of the factors that went into each decision:
Donaldson (1), Springer (2), Kluber (3), Cargo (4), Santana (5), Trumbo (6), Wood (7), Bogaerts (8), Salazar (9), Eaton (10), Cashner (11), D’Arnaud (12), Mejia (13), Boxberger (14), Pompey (15), Giles (16), Flores (17), Travis, D (18), Hahn (19), Martinez, C (20), Bethancourt (21), Burns (22), Sabathia (23), Pinto (24), House (25).
I like my pitching better, my offense is more robust. If they dont trade Papelbon and McGee/others consume saves preventing boxberger’s value then we’re in the same boat there too.
I concur with regard to your offense, though I disagree with your pitching assessment, but that’s to be expected. And you’re absolutely right, it’s possible I whiff on both of those players and get no value from either of them aside from possible elite rate stats, which still have a little bit of value. But then again, if I had to choose the two non-closers who had the best chances of becoming respective closers for their teams, it would be those two guys.
I honestly think it’s a forgone conclusion that Papelbon will be traded at some point. As stubborn as the Phillies have been with moving pieces in the past, their stance has softened of late and all signs point to at least Papelbon being on the move. The real question there is does a deal get done sooner or later, but even a half season worth of Giles at closer would be sufficient. Boxberger is easily the more risky of the two picks, but with a new manager in place and the way Boxberger pitched last season (which has continued into this spring), there’s a strong chance he opens the season at closer. If given the opportunity to close he merely has to perform as a lesser version of himself to lock down the gig…theoretically of course. I can’t imagine they would give the job back to McGee or go to a committee if he’s pitching well in the 9th, but crazier things have happened. And of course if he doesn’t perform well, he could lose the job or have it go to a committee.
The point is, though they are speculative picks at best, they both have among the highest probabilities of any reliever of making the jump into the 9th, and to top it off, they could dominate from the get-go. I would much rather gamble with an early pick on one of them than wait for, say, an Ottavino (whom I love by the way), as there’s much more uncertainty with players like him. He’s one of those guys that everyone knows should be given a shot at closing, but due to the realities of baseball (contracts, questionable managerial decisions, experience being valued over youth, etc), he may or may not be given that shot. And even if they are given the chance to close, their “stuff” isn’t lights out by any means, allowing for the possibility they simply don’t pitch well enough in a small sample size to hold onto the job. Wouldn’t be fair of course, but that’s how it goes in the world of closers.
Anyway, I definitely plan on rounding out my roster with an additional 3-5 set up men to provide myself with a bit more insurance should the worst case scenario come to pass. If I can’t come up with 2-3 closers from this potential group of 6-8 relievers, one of whom is already a closer, I’ve officially got some bad luck.
Daniel, great article…glad to see some of the strategy for you draft. I have a 10-team league draft coming up soon. First time doing this site and draft, any tips? Thanks
The bench is only 7 guys for that format right? I would say that the 10 teamer is less scarce than the 15teamer so I would slightly over draft impact bats even if there not sure thing health wise (cargo, tulo) and plate appearance wise (kris Bryant) or sophomore/rookie wise (springer/pederson) b/c there will be options to replace them. In my format (no moves after the draft) closers flew off the board as did middle-round pitchers like Teheran, wood, arrietta. I’d land one stud (like I did greinke and hopefully Carrasco) otherwise you shouldn’t have an issue waiting on pitchers (I got Bailey, Hutchinson, loose, Alvarez round 16-onward and we’re 15 teams). closers are certainly going earlier and more expensive (auction-wise) than I would have expected so if you want to land one of the ace closers (chapman/Kimbrel) then you should do so under 60 picks in. I don’t mind an ace closer in 10-team leagues…Id like a stronghold at each position but wouldn’t be concerned with another closer or another starter after an ace-type until later. Hope this helps.