Mike Trout: Fantasy AL MVP

Here are the definitions of each award, but the easiest thing to note is that draft cost is factored into most of our awards.

Well, duh. Even with cost factored in, Mike Trout ‘ran’ away with the hardware here, too. And (duh) nobody on the staff reached for this one, because, man, how many different ways can you say that Mike Trout was awesome this year, especially after all the real-life American League MVP discussions?

Here’s my attempt: Trout was amazingly consistent this year.

Strikeout rate is one of the main inputs in Bill Petti’s volatility calculator, and it makes sense from a real-life standpoint that a player with a lot of strikeouts might have stretches where he’s not adding much with the bat — especially if he doesn’t walk much. Even though Trout’s strikeout rate this year (21.8%) was two percentage points above average, though, Trout wasn’t very volatile.

Or maybe he was, and just oscillated between amazing and awesome:

HR R RBI SB BA BABIP ISO K%
May 5 21 16 8 0.324 0.39 0.231 23
June 3 27 16 14 0.372 0.438 0.159 17.7
July 10 32 23 9 0.392 0.412 0.412 18.8
August 7 26 19 11 0.284 0.329 0.216 23.9
Sept/Oct 5 23 9 7 0.289 0.378 0.211 25.9

In a way, this is another argument that it’s better to draft studs that contribute in all five categories. Because, sure, some of his months weren’t great if you stare down one aspect of his game. In June, his power was down a bit. Late in the season, he stole fewer bags. But there wasn’t one month on that ledger that you wouldn’t gladly take home to meet your mother.

When his power was down, his contact rate was up, and his BABIP was through the roof. He stole 14 bags in the month that only featured three home runs. When his power was up, his contact rate and BABIP were down a little, but the added power helped him survive the dip. A .284 batting average in your worst month is pretty sexy.

Should we worry about the trend in strikeout rates? Coupled with the trend in his BABIP? After all, if the two continue, he’s likely to have a much worse batting average next season.

Well, for one, his ‘bad’ BABIPs were pretty good, and his production in bad BABIP months would make for great full-season paces, too.

And his strikeout rate? His swinging strike rates never once were worse than league average. Here they are from May on, thanks to Jeff Zimmerman: 5.01%, 8.35%, 5.96%, 7.89%, 7.92%. Yes, those latter two numbers are a bit higher than his full-season work. No, it doesn’t really seem like a big deal. He was also swinging less in those two months (35.78 and 37.26% vs 40.85, 43.18 and 40.21%), so maybe he was just looking for home runs after his 10-homer month, and the passivity lead to a few extra swings and misses. The point is that he was very consistent overall, and even the mini-trends in the wrong direction seem like they aren’t a big deal.

Consistency is king. Well, in roto it matters a little less because you get your stats however way they come — as long as you leave your slumper in the lineup and don’t try to spot the streaks. But in head-to-head leagues, having a Steady Eddy like Trout is huge.

And look, I didn’t once mention his most excellent overall stats or Miguel Cabrera in awarding Mike Trout the RotoGraphs Fantasy AL MVP. Ooops.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt
12 years ago

For fantasy purposes, Trout and Miggy were MUCH closer and depending on the format Miggy could easily be more valuabe.

I think perhaps you’ve let the cloud of the real life debate factor into a FANTASY debate. When defense and baserunning are taken out of the equation, I don’t understand how one can make a statement like “Well, duh. Even with cost factored in, Mike Trout ‘ran’ away with the hardware here, too. And (duh) nobody on the staff reached for this one…”.

FANTASY MVP. Don’t let the real life debate make you biased.

zack
12 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Draft position

Matt
12 years ago
Reply to  zack

Nope. Says nothing about draft position. An MVP award doesn’t depend on draft position (or in real life, salary). It’s strictly performance.

Most Valuable Player. Not player that provided the best return or most valuable relative to initial cost.

Tom B
12 years ago
Reply to  zack

*cough* You*cough* said nothing about it. Maybe you should read the article describing the awards again. This is fantasy MVP, and cost is most CERTAINLY a factor. That is why this is Trout’s award, and Miggy is like the 15th or 20th person down the list. You had to pay a first round pick for Miggy. How can he outperform that?

FANTASY MVP, don’t let the facts get in the way of your dumb argument.

Evan Ralston
12 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Read the introduction segment to the Fantasy Awards:

MVP
The fantasy MVP is NOT the best player overall. The fantasy MVP is the guy that returned the most value. So we give consideration to draft cost. Hint: in the AL it might not make much of a difference. But in the NL, where a player like Ryan Braun was excellent, but also expensive, you might find a surprise.

Matt
12 years ago
Reply to  Evan Ralston

Eating crow.