Marcus Stroman Heads to The Big Apple

In our first big trade of the non-waiver trade deadline season, Marcus Stroman joins the New York Mets, at which point Mets fans know all too well that he’ll turn into a pumpkin and never be effective again until he’s traded away. In all seriousness the knee-jerk reaction is that this move is fantastic for his fantasy value, given a more pitcher friendly venue and a switch to the National League. Let’s dive into the park factors to get more clarity on the change in home parks.

Park Factor Comparison
Team 3yr 1yr 1B 2B 3B HR SO BB GB FB LD IFFB FIP
Blue Jays 101 98 98 105 102 102 100 99 100 99 98 97 100
Mets 93 87 95 94 86 97 101 100 97 100 97 109 98

Well gosh darn, it’s not often you see a near sweep in a ballpark factor comparison. You’ll see in the two factors that begin the comparison, the 3yr and 1yr, Citi Field (Mets) has been significantly more pitcher friendly than the Rogers Centre (Blue Jays). Those represent the three and one year overall run park factors and ultimately are most important.

In literally every hit type, Citi comes out ahead. It has suppressed singles to a greater degree, and the gap in factors for doubles and triples is even larger. This is important, because as one of the league’s most extreme groundballers, Stroman has been prone to inflated BABIP marks. His career .306 mark is above the league average that generally sits in the mid-.290 range.

For both hitters and pitchers, home run park factors are also quite impactful. Citi once again is far more pitcher friendly, as Rogers actually inflates homers. As an extreme groundballer, Stroman doesn’t allow a high rate of fly balls, so he won’t be as affected by a change in factor here as much as a more fly ball prone pitcher. But still, this is obviously a positive for his performance at Citi.

The strikeout and walk factors are very similar, both parks being about neutral in both. Amazingly, despite a vast pitch repertoire, Stroman has only posted a strikeout rate above 20% once, and that was during his 2014 debut. The spike I keep expecting to occur at any time continues to get delayed to the point that it’s silly to expect it to ever happen. However, the move to the NL should provide the best opportunity for a boost there has ever been. If he can’t get that strikeout rate above 20% while pitching in the NL, there’s no hope!

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The most important batted ball type factors to pay attention to are LD and IFFB. The line drive rate factors are near identical, while Citi’s IFFB factor is dramatically higher. That’s usually a very good thing for a pitcher, but Stroman has never induced a high rate of pop-ups, for two reasons. One, he doesn’t allow enough fly balls, so even if his IFFB% (remember that metric is a percentage of fly balls) was higher than the league average, his IFFBs induced would still be rather low. And two, his IFFB% has always been well below average anyway, resulting in a super low number of pop-ups. This year is the first he’s gotten it into double digits, as he has already induced more pop-ups than the last two seasons combined.

Overall, it’s pretty obvious that between the park switch and the league switch, this is an excellent move that boost Stroman’s fantasy value. This doesn’t actually mean that he’ll earn more value the rest of the way than he has though, as you must keep in mind that his ERA sits more than a run below his SIERA. But at least there’s less chance his luck regresses and his SIERA declines to meet his ERA rather than the other way around.





Mike Podhorzer is the 2015 Fantasy Sports Writers Association Baseball Writer of the Year and three-time Tout Wars champion. He is the author of the eBook Projecting X 2.0: How to Forecast Baseball Player Performance, which teaches you how to project players yourself. Follow Mike on X@MikePodhorzer and contact him via email.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brad
6 years ago

What are your thoughts about the Mets bad infield defense and Stroman being a ground ball pitcher?

BMac
6 years ago
Reply to  Brad

That being said… Vlad is not great at 3B, Cavan has been kinda meh at 2B while , Gurriel was bad there early on. Maybe the bar isn’t that high.