Madison Bumgarner: Postseason Hero
If you’ve had the misfortune to be stricken by amnesia, allow me to remind you – Madison Bumgarner was fantastic this postseason. Per a pet statistic called ChampAdded, he was responsible for about 90 percent of the Giants’ World Series victory. In a sense, I’ve already written about Bumgarner this winter. Now is a good time to share the results from the question I asked one month ago – how much would you pay for him?
In real life, Bumgarner is signed to an affordable contract. Most fantasy owners don’t have contracts. Of the 24 commenters, most mentioned they would pay something around $25 with a range from $20 to $27. After coming off a fantastic regular season worth $21, a $25 purchase price seems reasonable. According to FantasyPros, his average cost was $22 last season.
Like all fantasy acquisitions, you should consider the pros and cons to owning Bumgarner. He provides elite four category production. I was initially surprised he was worth only $21 after winning 18 games, striking out 219, and posting a 2.98 ERA and 1.09 WHIP. As you probably know, the sport has skewed in favor of pitchers in recent years, which devalues elite performances.
Bumgarner has been consistently healthy with over 200 innings pitched in the last four seasons. He lasts deep into the ball game, which helps yield victories. His home park is ridiculously pitcher friendly. He doesn’t need the hometown advantage – his 9.07 K/9, 1.78 BB/9, and 20.2 percent K%-BB% would play anywhere. It simply helps to call AT&T Park home.
If you’re looking for negatives, it’s mostly workload. He threw 270 regular and postseason inning in 2014. He’ll have a short offseason to recover for the 2015 campaign. Worrying about workloads is difficult – often it’s fine until it’s not. It’s up to you to decide how to handle his past usage.
One thing I do worry about is his repertoire. He threw his cutter about one-third of the time. Frequent use of a cutter isn’t a problem, but Bumgarner’s is more aptly described as a slutter. It’s four MPH slower than his fastball, which tells me he’s adding some slider snap to the pitch. From our esteemed colleague Jeff Zimmerman, we know that frequent slider usage is an injury indicator. Who knows if the same applies to frequent slutter use? Interestingly, it was his second least effective pitch last season.
Mechanically, he’s one of the most unique pitchers in the big leagues. Take a look.
Nobody teaches those mechanics. His arm comes way behind him as though he’s getting ready to submarine, and then he comes (mostly) over the top. I’ve had spirited arguments over whether that’s a three-quarters or side-armed delivery. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. What could matter is that he has unusual mechanics which may increase or decrease his injury risk. We don’t know, it’s just something to note.
How should we treat Bumgarner on draft day? That depends on your predispositions. If you’re willing to pay top dollar for top pitching, then Bumgarner could be a useful investment. When healthy, he’s an excellent fantasy producer. He’ll probably be overvalued based on his fantastic postseason, but we’re talking about a dollar or two on average. If you want an excuse to take a pass. you can point to his slutter, workload, and strange mechanics.
The two hardest things about drafting pitching are inconsistency and substitutions (in the economic sense). Bumgarner is one of the least inconsistent pitchers in baseball, but even he comes with an injury risk of around 30 percent. As for substitutes, any of the top 20 or so pitchers after Kershaw can be considered interchangeable. Is Cole Hamels much different than Bumgarner? Tyson Ross? Bumgarner is an easy pick to outperform them, but it’s not a lock. If Ross costs $10 less than Bumgarner, than maybe the downgrade in expected performance can be applied to an improvement elsewhere.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam


Heh. Slutter.
Giggity.
Who else but Quagmire?!
My biggest concern would be innings. 270 last year counting the postseason after maxing out at 223.1 in 2012 (w/ postseason) and only 201.1 in 2013. Then again, his delivery reminds me of Randy Johnson, to whom huge innings loads were never really an issue, so who knows!
But workloads like 270 IP/season weren’t in the least extraordinary in prior generations, particularly those generations where pitching had the upper hand. The key then was, Could the pitcher who threw those many innings do it without going full out all the time? Bumgarner looks as if he almost never throws full out, pitch after pitch going with the same slow, easy pace in winding up and the same oily languid unraveling.
I’d be interested in knowing the objective opinion of an expert in pitching kinesiology, on what if any critical differences there are in the motions of Bumgarner and Walter Johnson.
Good point. I guess my concern wasn’t the 270 IP itself, but rather the increase of almost 70 innings over 2013. It seems like teams are frequently cautious in significantly increasing a young pitcher’s workload from season to season, a la Strasburg a couple years ago.
From my communications with a couple of kinesiology experts who are professional trainers of pitching mechanics, perceived “effort” doesn’t have a real effect on injury potential. Guys like Matt Moore, Johnny Hellweg, Jarrod Parker, Brandon Beachy, etc. get injured while guys like Tim Lincecum, Chris Sale, Felix Hernandez, etc. stay healthy.
Even the “inverted W” notion that has become sort of popular lacks scientific data to back it up at this point. For now, there is no consensus among experts as to what factors cause injury among pitchers.
I’ve drafted him every year since 2011 but probably not for 2015. It is very likely he will be overvalued because of that postseason. In 2014 I drafted him in the 5th round after 12 other pitchers, and I’ll still look to draft my first SP in that round. I doubt Mad Bum will be available.