Madison Bumgarner: Postseason Hero

If you’ve had the misfortune to be stricken by amnesia, allow me to remind you – Madison Bumgarner was fantastic this postseason. Per a pet statistic called ChampAdded, he was responsible for about 90 percent of the Giants’ World Series victory. In a sense, I’ve already written about Bumgarner this winter. Now is a good time to share the results from the question I asked one month ago – how much would you pay for him?

In real life, Bumgarner is signed to an affordable contract. Most fantasy owners don’t have contracts. Of the 24 commenters, most mentioned they would pay something around $25 with a range from $20 to $27. After coming off a fantastic regular season worth $21, a $25 purchase price seems reasonable. According to FantasyPros, his average cost was $22 last season.

Like all fantasy acquisitions, you should consider the pros and cons to owning Bumgarner. He provides elite four category production. I was initially surprised he was worth only $21 after winning 18 games, striking out 219, and posting a 2.98 ERA and 1.09 WHIP. As you probably know, the sport has skewed in favor of pitchers in recent years, which devalues elite performances.

Bumgarner has been consistently healthy with over 200 innings pitched in the last four seasons. He lasts deep into the ball game, which helps yield victories. His home park is ridiculously pitcher friendly. He doesn’t need the hometown advantage – his 9.07 K/9, 1.78 BB/9, and 20.2 percent K%-BB% would play anywhere. It simply helps to call AT&T Park home.

If you’re looking for negatives, it’s mostly workload. He threw 270 regular and postseason inning in 2014. He’ll have a short offseason to recover for the 2015 campaign. Worrying about workloads is difficult – often it’s fine until it’s not. It’s up to you to decide how to handle his past usage.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

One thing I do worry about is his repertoire. He threw his cutter about one-third of the time. Frequent use of a cutter isn’t a problem, but Bumgarner’s is more aptly described as a slutter. It’s four MPH slower than his fastball, which tells me he’s adding some slider snap to the pitch. From our esteemed colleague Jeff Zimmerman, we know that frequent slider usage is an injury indicator. Who knows if the same applies to frequent slutter use? Interestingly, it was his second least effective pitch last season.

Bum RA

Mechanically, he’s one of the most unique pitchers in the big leagues. Take a look.

Bumgarner

Nobody teaches those mechanics. His arm comes way behind him as though he’s getting ready to submarine, and then he comes (mostly) over the top. I’ve had spirited arguments over whether that’s a three-quarters or side-armed delivery. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. What could matter is that he has unusual mechanics which may increase or decrease his injury risk. We don’t know, it’s just something to note.

How should we treat Bumgarner on draft day? That depends on your predispositions. If you’re willing to pay top dollar for top pitching, then Bumgarner could be a useful investment. When healthy, he’s an excellent fantasy producer. He’ll probably be overvalued based on his fantastic postseason, but we’re talking about a dollar or two on average. If you want an excuse to take a pass. you can point to his slutter, workload, and strange mechanics.

The two hardest things about drafting pitching are inconsistency and substitutions (in the economic sense). Bumgarner is one of the least inconsistent pitchers in baseball, but even he comes with an injury risk of around 30 percent. As for substitutes, any of the top 20 or so pitchers after Kershaw can be considered interchangeable. Is Cole Hamels much different than Bumgarner? Tyson Ross? Bumgarner is an easy pick to outperform them, but it’s not a lock. If Ross costs $10 less than Bumgarner, than maybe the downgrade in expected performance can be applied to an improvement elsewhere.





You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
The Stranger
11 years ago

Heh. Slutter.

Glen Quagmire
11 years ago
Reply to  The Stranger

Giggity.

Cason Jollette
11 years ago
Reply to  Glen Quagmire

Who else but Quagmire?!

Emcee Peepants
11 years ago

My biggest concern would be innings. 270 last year counting the postseason after maxing out at 223.1 in 2012 (w/ postseason) and only 201.1 in 2013. Then again, his delivery reminds me of Randy Johnson, to whom huge innings loads were never really an issue, so who knows!

Avattoir
11 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

But workloads like 270 IP/season weren’t in the least extraordinary in prior generations, particularly those generations where pitching had the upper hand. The key then was, Could the pitcher who threw those many innings do it without going full out all the time? Bumgarner looks as if he almost never throws full out, pitch after pitch going with the same slow, easy pace in winding up and the same oily languid unraveling.

I’d be interested in knowing the objective opinion of an expert in pitching kinesiology, on what if any critical differences there are in the motions of Bumgarner and Walter Johnson.

Emcee Peepants
11 years ago
Reply to  Avattoir

Good point. I guess my concern wasn’t the 270 IP itself, but rather the increase of almost 70 innings over 2013. It seems like teams are frequently cautious in significantly increasing a young pitcher’s workload from season to season, a la Strasburg a couple years ago.

Paul
11 years ago
Reply to  Avattoir

From my communications with a couple of kinesiology experts who are professional trainers of pitching mechanics, perceived “effort” doesn’t have a real effect on injury potential. Guys like Matt Moore, Johnny Hellweg, Jarrod Parker, Brandon Beachy, etc. get injured while guys like Tim Lincecum, Chris Sale, Felix Hernandez, etc. stay healthy.

Even the “inverted W” notion that has become sort of popular lacks scientific data to back it up at this point. For now, there is no consensus among experts as to what factors cause injury among pitchers.

Near
11 years ago

I’ve drafted him every year since 2011 but probably not for 2015. It is very likely he will be overvalued because of that postseason. In 2014 I drafted him in the 5th round after 12 other pitchers, and I’ll still look to draft my first SP in that round. I doubt Mad Bum will be available.