Looking At Strikeout Rate Changes After 70 Batters Faced

We know very little this early into the season. Your Roto position matters little, your sleepers struggling doesn’t mean a great deal (unless it can impact playing time, and closers, well, we know about as much now as we did in the preseason: zilch.

However, the “small sample size” caveats will, eventually, begin to fade. And in fact, there may actually be some information we can glean from the early going, at least as it pertains to pitcher strikeout rates.

Strikeout rates are among the first statistics to stabilize. “70” is not a magic number, but after about 70 batters faced, a majority of the future variance (R2=0.5) in strikeout rate can be explained by strikeout rate to date. That is, after 70 batters faced, pitcher strikeout rate has begun to “stabilize.”

What that means is that for the 65 pitchers who have faced 70 batters already this season and also faced 70 last year (sorry, Felipe Paulino), changes in strikeout rate may be indicative of unerlying changes. I pulled that sweet, sweet data, and here are the names making waves, good or bad.

Strikeout Percentage Gainers

Name TBF K% 14 SwStr% 14 vFA (pfx) 14 K% 13 SwStr% 13 vFA 13 K% change SwStr% change vFA change
Stephen Strasburg 76 36.8 13.9 94.1 26.1 10.6 95.2 10.7 3.3 -1.1
Kyle Lohse 84 25.0 9.5 90.6 15.5 7.3 89.8 9.5 2.2 0.8
Felix Hernandez 84 35.7 15.9 91.6 26.3 10.7 91.3 9.4 5.2 0.3
Andrew Cashner 80 27.5 7.1 94.3 18.1 8.3 94.6 9.4 -1.2 -0.3
C.J. Wilson 81 29.6 8.9 90.3 20.6 8.1 90.9 9.0 0.8 -0.6
Nathan Eovaldi 77 24.7 7.4 95.5 17.3 7.7 96.1 7.4 -0.3 -0.6
Jarred Cosart 74 20.3 6.7 94.1 13.4 5.7 94.5 6.9 1.0 -0.4
CC Sabathia 81 25.9 10.2 89.8 19.3 9.6 91.3 6.6 0.6 -1.5
Adam Wainwright 82 29.3 7.8 91 22.9 9.6 91.2 6.4 -1.8 -0.2
Johnny Cueto 84 27.4 11.7 93.2 21.1 11.0 92.4 6.3 0.7 0.8

Oh, Stephen Strasburg is getting even better, that’s not terrifying at all! The velocity dip might be of some concern for Strasburg – though velocity is generally lower in April and declines with age – but he’s missing more bats. It seems the increased usage of his changeup – up from 16.2 percent to 28 percent and with a 50 percent whiff-per-swing rate – is disagreeable for hitters. It’s only a 6.5MPH difference, but it seems to be fooling batters.

Meanwhile, Kyle Lohse is bringing additional heat, leading to his unexpected outing over the weekend. He’s just 48 percent owned in Yahoo leagues, and if the early-season changes in strikeout ability are at all indicated that he could be, say, an 18 percent strikeout guy, he’s worth a look.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Nathan Eovaldi and Jarred Cosart are perhaps the most interesting names on the list as they both entered the season to some degree of optimism, especially for Eovaldi, thought ZIPS didn’t like either for seven strikeouts per nine. Eovaldi isn’t throwing any faster, but he’s traded four-seamers for more two-seamers and sliders, per PITCHf/x. He’s getting whiffs on nearly 30 percent of those sliders, helping make up for the paltry 11 percent whiff rate on the fastball (Brooks Baseball doesn’t differentiate his two- and four-seam offerings). Cosart, meanwhile, appears to have traded in the fastball for far more cutters, which he’s thrown 72 percent of the time. That 94.1MPH heat certainly plays up if the ball is biting rather than flying straight, and the result has been not just an uptick in whiffs (16.1 percent from 13.6) but also groundballs (66.7 percent from 56.9).

And yeah, looks like I’ll be losing my “Andrew Cashner won’t be a top-70 starter” bold prediction (the others look solid, however).

Strikeout Percentage Losers

Name TBF K% 14 SwStr% 14 vFA (pfx) 14 K% 13 SwStr% 13 vFA 13 K% change SwStr% change vFA change
A.J. Burnett 79 12.7 7.4 91.6 26.1 10.6 92.4 -13.4 -3.2 -0.8
Julio Teheran 80 11.3 9 91.6 22 10.5 92.1 -10.7 -1.5 -0.5
Ivan Nova 75 10.7 4.5 92 19.8 9.3 93.2 -9.1 -4.8 -1.2
Justin Verlander 89 14.6 9.8 93.4 23.5 10.5 94 -8.9 -0.7 -0.6
Ricky Nolasco 80 11.3 6.6 90.4 19.8 10.5 90.4 -8.5 -3.9 0.0
Scott Feldman 79 8.9 4.8 88 17.4 7.2 89.9 -8.5 -2.4 -1.9
Ubaldo Jimenez 78 16.7 6.3 90.6 25 8.8 92.1 -8.3 -2.5 -1.5
Cliff Lee 82 18.3 8 89.4 25.3 9.4 90.4 -7.0 -1.4 -1.0
Tanner Scheppers 76 14.5 7.5 93.7 19.5 10 96.3 -5.0 -2.5 -2.6
Jeff Samardzija 79 19 6.3 94 23.4 10.5 94.6 -4.4 -4.2 -0.6

Sorry, but I refuse to say bad things about A.J. Burnett, ever. Love that guy. But the numbers aren’t friendly, to say the least. Sure, he had a down June last year (17.9 percent strikeout rate), too, and bounced back fine. He may want to move back to throwing more fastballs despite the velocity decline – while he hasn’t enduced a single whiff with it, the sinker is only getting whiffs 10 percent of the time (it was just 7.1 percent last year), and the fastball played pretty well last season (21.8 percent whiffs).

Tanner Scheppers wasn’t someone I was high on to begin with, and his stats are taking the move from bullpen to rotation poorly. A drop in strikeout rate is expected with such a move, and the groundball rate remains more than fine, but there’s going to be very little fantasy upside here if he can’t find a way to miss some bats with the heavy sinker he employs.

I’m not quite as sure what’s up with Julio Teheran, who hasn’t lost more velocity than the usual April half-mile dip but can’t seem to miss bats early on. It’s not the slider that’s been the issue, as he’s still getting whiffs on 41.4 percent of those and throwing a fair number of them, but the whiff rate is down on his other offerings, including the heater. Not only is Teheran missing slightly fewer bats, but batters are fouling off far fewer balls, down from 28.8 percent to 19.3 percent, per Baseball Reference. Trading fouls were whiffs or called strikes is great, but Teheran is trading them for balls in play right now.

A lot of the other names on here are very familiar, which shouldn’t be all that surprising – pitchers strikeout fewer batters as they age, and starters see a pretty big drop-off as they reach their late 20s. Ubaldo Jimenez? 30. Justin Verlander? 31. Ricky Nolasco? 31. Scott Feldman? 32. Jeff Samardzija? 29. Cliff Lee? Ageless. You likely priced in a strikeout decline for many of these names, so it’s not necessarily worth panicking about in some cases. I’d be very weary of Jimenez moving forward though, if you want one recommendation from this group – his ‘rebound’ last season was largely based on competition, and there are a lot of scary signs in his early-2013 profile that are resurfacing now.





Blake Murphy is a freelance sportswriter based out of Toronto. Formerly of the Score, he's the managing editor at Raptors Republic and frequently pops up at Sportsnet, Vice, and around here. Follow him on Twitter @BlakeMurphyODC.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David
12 years ago

I think the movement on Strasburg’s change is what gets hitters more than the change of speed. It moves almost like a splitter at times.

Dan Rozenson
12 years ago

Blake, keep in mind with the Strasburg changeup that the automatic classifications have not picked up his new slider. Most of them are being called changeups. And the slider has gotten a ton of whiffs so far. Helps explain the K rate.

Emcee Peepants
12 years ago

Maybe Teheran is just a slow starter? He had his lowest K% in the first couple months last season as well.

Tomthebod
12 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

I was just thinking the same thing about Teheran being a slow starter. He dominated last year in the spring if I remember correctly, but his first 3 starts were pretty rough, and the low k-rate caused me to drop him last year. I’m still kicking myself for dropping him.

M
12 years ago

Is Ubaldo a cause to feel tired going forward or are you cautious of him going forward?

supgreg
12 years ago
Reply to  M

Always cautious of him, never trusted the mechanics.

M
12 years ago
Reply to  supgreg

Blake nailed it. Weary vs. Wary.

drewcorbMember since 2026
12 years ago

What do you think of the guys like Wainwright and Cashner who have gained K% but lost SwStr%? Those seem to contradict each other and I would expect SwStr% to stabilize before K%, although I could be wrong.

Andy Cleary
12 years ago
Reply to  Blake Murphy

Where does one find LookStr and FoulStr numbers? I can’t find them on FG…

RotoworldModsAreNazis
12 years ago

“Weary”? Really??

Suggestion
12 years ago

70 batters faced… but these pitchers have faced only two or three teams. What if those teams happen to be in the top one percent of team-level K rates in the majors? That is, while K rate may stabilize after 70 batters faced on average, I don’t think the average stabilization rate should apply equally to all pitchers. Context should matter. One method to address this concern might be to center or standardize pitcher K rates vs each team relative to team average K rates. For example, Stras K’ed 12 Marlins. But how far away from average is the 12 Ks Strasburg got against the Marlins relative to other starters vs. Marlins? Thanks for the work you do.

Kevin
12 years ago

Lee’s low K total is probably just noise right now. He looked fine against the Brewers.

Jeff
12 years ago

Perhaps it would be more beneficial to compare them to the same sample size from 2013.

Derrick
12 years ago

Lohse is apparently only throwing his 4-seam FB 0.3% of the time so far this season. The vast majority of his FB are being classified as Sinkers and the velocity on his sinker is down just a bit this season. It would appear to me that the velocity on Lohse’s 4-seam FB has very little to do with his K/9 increase in 2014.

Dan
12 years ago

Any thoughts on what is driving Jordan Zimmermann’s 9.3% jump in K% and 4.7% jump in SwStr%? He would’ve been near the top of the list with a few more batters faced this year.