Happy Baseball!
With real, meaningful baseball right around the corner, I’d like to thank you all for supporting RotoGraphs this offseason. I very much appreciate the opportunity to tell people I’m a professional fantasy baseball expert. You should see the faces people make as they try to figure out what, exactly, that means. Without your support, I’d have a silly job selling software widgets.
Hopefully, the tips and tricks you’ve picked up this winter will lead to fantasy victory. People who read sites like RotoGraphs tend to be the same people who put full effort into their teams. You already possess the greatest indicator for success.
The transition from winter to summer means I’ll be moving most of my content from strategy to player picks. It’s bittersweet. On the one hand, I get actual baseball. However, I relish sinking my teeth into creative avenues to do something a little bit new or unexpected. The in-season grind ensures I’m kept too busy to do something frivolous like thinking.
In any event, you have my (rambling) thanks. And because 173 words is not an acceptable post length, I’m going to spend the rest of my time explaining my staff picks. The full lists will presumably be published later today.
FanGraphs Staff Picks – AL
AL East – Tampa
AL Central – Detroit
AL West – Los Angeles
WC1 – Texas
WC2 – Seattle
MVP – Mike Trout
Cy – Yu Darvish
RoY – Mitch Haniger
You’ll notice a strong vein of contrarianism in my picks. DFS has taught me that there’s no percentage in the easy plays. Yea, Boston and Cleveland and Houston may be more likely to win their divisions, but who gives a crap if you get that right. I’d rather be uniquely wrong than boringly correct. At least when there’s nothing at stake.
Trout can win the MVP without the Angels making the postseason. The Angels cannot make the postseason without an MVP season from Trout. Similarly, if three teams are going to represent the West – an unlikely outcome since the Astros and Athletics are also good – then they’ll all need big contributions.
FanGraphs Staff Picks – NL
NL East – New York
NL Central – St. Louis
NL West – Colorado
WC1 – Chicago
WC2 – Philadelphia
MVP – Nolan Arenado
Cy – Carlos Martinez
RoY – Robert Gsellman
More of the same in the senior circuit. I couldn’t help including the Cubs in October baseball, although I did manage to snub the Dodgists. I found a place for Philadelphia because…what if I’m right? Every year, at least one team makes a surprising step forward, fueled by prospect growth, veteran breakouts, or general good fortune. When the Cubs and Astros tipped to contention, it was at least a year before they were supposed to be ready. I recall liking those teams more than the consensus. I feel similarly about the Phillies.
RotoGraphs Staff Picks – Hitters
Sleeper (201-300 overall) – Michael Brantley
Deep Sleeper (301-400 overall) – Chris Owings
Undrafted – Matt Adams
Rookie – Dansby Swanson
Sophomore – Trevor Story
Steal – Ryan Schimpf
Bust – Brian Dozier
Brantley appears to be healthy and ready for an Opening Day start. I’ve seen some scouts express (temporary) concerns about his timing. We’ll see what kind of workload he can manage. The Owings hype apparatus has gained full steam since I submitted these picks. Ruined what I thought was a rather clever pick. Adams has remained sleepy despite impending outfield eligibility and BSOHL.
There will be better steals than Schimpf, but I enjoy his story. Similarly, there will be bustier busts than Dozier, but it serves the Twins right for asking too much this offseason. And everybody loves a good Story.
RotoGraphs Staff Picks – Pitchers
Sleeper – Pat Corbin
Deep Sleeper – Michael Montgomery
Undrafted – Charlie Morton
Rookie – Robert Gsellman
Sophomore – Edwin Diaz
Steal – Addison Reed
SP Bust – Danny Duffy
RP Bust – Wade Davis
Corbin was our darling before his arm crumpled. His spring results were solid. The scouting report I saw wasn’t glowing, noting a lack of both power and finesse. We’ll see how it plays out. Montgomery lost the fifth starter job to Anderson. He’ll still throw 130-ish innings, and they’ll be better than any waiver fodder. Morton throws a cool bowling ball. He might be a better fit as a closer, not that he’ll get that chance.
Consistency! I picked Gsellman for top rookie on both lists. I didn’t realize it. The RotoGraphs list was picked about a week before the FanGraphs list. I’m looking at relievers for the best sophomore and steal. Obviously, this was before Jeurys Familia received a tiny 15 game suspension. Reed’s still the top reliever in that ‘pen.
It’s not that I dislike Duffy, but he seems a lot more likely to flop than the guys with more than a couple months of success. Davis is too glaringly obvious, except to all the people who have paid as though he’s the 2015 version.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam
Re: Davis as a bust… is the consensus that Rodon is the next man up for the Cubs, practically speaking, or would they jump to Edwards as most of the stats would dictate? (Asking for any other friends who jumped on the Shawn Kelley bandwagon and may be looking for other options at this point.)
They keep trying to replace Rondon so there must be something about him they don’t like. Edwards is upsidey, but I’m not seeing why everyone is drooling over him like he’s healthy Carter Capps. Still a lot of volatility in his profile.
Uehara then? Strop is great but they may view him as set-up only…at least they used to…could be different this year.
They acquired Uehara as his handcuff. They won’t want to pay Edwards the arb money for saves.
“I’d rather be uniquely wrong than boringly correct.” So you want to brag about the 1 thing you got right and ignore the 9 unforced errors?
Nice to read someone who is as smart as myself. Colorado, Tampa Bay, and St. Louis to win their divisions. That’s how I picked’em.
Don’t bother doing team picks anymore if you don’t take them seriously. I dig the player picks tho.
Seriously…who picks the Phillies to make the playoffs over the Dodgers and the Angels to make the playoffs over the Indians?
Completely agree with Brade’s first sentence. What value does a “prediction” have if it doesn’t represent what you think will happen? I think this approach was a tad arrogant.
I ripped your picks on the other post, so I do appreciate this post explaining yourself. However, I don’t understand your explanation. “I’d rather be uniquely wrong than boringly correct. At least when there’s nothing at stake.”
Isn’t the point of picking trying to choose who you think is most likely to win? These aren’t the bold predictions posts. I can see making one or two “unique” picks, but going all contrarian just seems asinine.
I know most people have this mindset, but I just don’t understand it. What’s the point of me regurgitating steamer projections?
I understand your point, but picking the dodgers or Cubs is not regurgitating projections. I believe they are actually the best team and most likely to win their respective divisions. Now if you want to take a couple fliers that’s fine, but you ought to be able to explain why. Like I’m picking the Angels because I think their pitching is highly underrated etc. Thanks for the response.
You don’t understand why your picks are getting attention when you pretty much stated you picked them because they would get you the most attention. They’re generally viewed as “who you truly believe will win”, not “who will make the biggest splash”. I thought that was what the bold predictions were for.
Well of course they’ll draw attention, that’s not what I don’t understand. The idea that one must select the Cubs or Indians is strangely closeminded with regards to a sport that very frequently surprises us.
I picked the teams I picked because I think they can win and are therefore reasonable selections. The guidance for this exercise wasn’t “pick who you think Steamer likes to win the divisions.” I could take the time to lay out individual justifications, but it all boils down to one thing – reality is not as clean-cut as our depth charts tab implies. At least for this exercise, I’ve chosen to believe in scenarios that expose the consensus teams’ weaknesses while emphasizing the strengths of the underdogs. Perhaps it’s not the percentage play, but it’s also not unrealistic.
Again I understand, but think of it in another context. If you are filling out a March Madness bracket, wouldn’t you agree that simply picking all upsets is silly. In this same scenario, if you get a lot of upset picks correct, it doesn’t really mean anything since that is all you picked and you probably will have most picks completely wrong. This is the point I am trying to make, it is reasonable to make a few underdog picks that you feel have a high probability, but picking all underdogs undermines the whole exercise. In my opinion.
Well yes and no. It’s not like I only picked bad teams. All of the teams with the exception of the Phillies are expected to be pretty good. And even Philadelphia has an obvious path to surprising competitiveness. So, sure I picked underdogs, but they’re the kind I’d pick in any bracket.
fwiw, I don’t do March Madness because I don’t believe in other professional sports.
“I don’t believe in other professional sports.”
That may be, but I assure you they exist.
You can’t prove it 🙂
Also, as a person with a silly job selling software widgets, I should be offended but I am not, you are absolutely right and I congratulate you Sir.
’tis what I did in a previous life.
Maybe the team picks should somewhat mirror the player picks and have a sleeper listed for each division after who you actually think will win. Yours is the list of sleeper teams.
I can see your picks if you actually expected this list to be released on Saturday.