Five NL Starters You Shouldn’t Draft

Every year, a number of starting pitchers get drafted higher than they should because of their successful performances the year prior. Call me crazy, but I tend to avoid these pitchers. Why? Because the expected cost outweighs the projected output. Instead, I set my sights on pitchers still on the upswing, and even a few coming off disappointing seasons who are likely to bounce back.

Not every pitcher can be Roy Halladay or CC Sabathia, guys who can actually sustain their peaks across multiple years. But that doesn’t stop owners from latching onto a pitcher following a big season, or even an outlier season, hoping that said pitcher has established a new talent level. In most cases, though, the wave has already crested.

This strategy gets tricky because it requires: 1) distinguishing between pitchers still capable of better and those about to take a step back; and 2) accepting that there are simply some pitchers you won’t own come draft day. The five below fall into that category for me this year.

My cohort Mr. Podhorzer covered some lower-level overvalued players earlier today, but here are five candidates who rank a bit higher. As a bonus, I’ve included a pair of lower-tiered options (by RotoGraphs standards) that could provide better value.

In short, let other owners grab these guys.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Mat Latos, Padres RHP
The Padres ace busted out in a big way last year, joining some elite company, as colleague Mr. Axisa noted. But Latos is pretty much the poster boy for this, well, post for a few reasons. First, his innings increased by more than 60 from 2009 to 2010, a jump that typically signals an adjustment is coming. (Familiar with the Verducci Effect, right?). In fact, it started to show at the end of 2010, when Latos clearly tired from the workload even though San Diego tried to limit his innings: Over his final seven starts, he went 1-5 with a 5.66 ERA and a 1.51 WHIP. On top of that, Latos’ team is unlikely to repeat the success of last year—much of which is owed to him—meaning it will be harder to come by wins, giving him a smaller margin for error. And yet the righty is still a sexy pick, going as early as Round 6.
Alternative Options: Safer, more proven pitchers in better situations who have just as much upside in 2011, like Roy Oswalt or Yovani Gallardo.

Matt Cain, Giants RHP
Strike One: Owners have gone from long-underrating Cain (his 26-42 record from 2006-08 had a lot to do with it) to overcompensating by giving him too much fantasy love this year. Strike Two: He threw a career-high 244 and 2/3 innings last year, and while he actually had a 0.00 postseason ERA and is a genuine 200-inning horse, Cain has now piled up a whopping 1,070+ innings over five seasons. Do you want to gamble in Round 8 that he can tack on another 200 and have a career year? Strike Three: Really, still? Then allow me to point out that the guy is dealing with elbow inflammation this spring.
Alternative Options: Chad Billingsley or Matt Garza, two still-underrated workhorses with less wear and tear and tendencies to dominate for stretches.

Tim Hudson, Braves RHP
This is no knock on Hudson, who couldn’t care less about this sort of thing, but he is the prototype better-in-real-life-than-in-fantasy pitcher. Look, his 2.83 ERA and 1.15 WHIP from 2010 are shiny, as are his 17 wins. What’s not? His K/9, which was 5.5 last season and hasn’t topped 6.0 since Moneyball came out. Now that pitching is plentiful and oodles of starters can help bring down your ERA and WHIP, Hudson’s skill set is no longer as valuable, especially in leagues that use strikeout rate as a category or have an innings cap, thus making K/9 more of a focus. A year ago, owners could sneak Huddy with late-round pick (remember, he only made seven starts in 2009 while returning from TJ surgery), but now, he’s going in Rounds 12-14.
Alternative Options: Hiroki Kuroda’s similarly sturdy ERA and WHIP—and slightly higher K/9—will be available a few rounds later, as should the “other” Hudson, Daniel, who may be primed for a breakout as a D-back.

Jaime Garcia, Cardinals LHP
Another innings increaser. Except in Garcia’s case, the hike alone—125 and 2/3 innings!—should scare the bejesus out of you. Paired with the fact that the Cardinals can’t afford to limit the 24-year-old’s innings like they did at times last season—losing Adam Wainwright’s 230 will do that—and things get even more frightening. While there are positives here, like his 55.9% ground ball rate, Garcia’s splits (1.74 ERA and 1.15 WHIP at home vs. 3.82 and 1.51 on the road, which jibe with ESPN’s park factors for Busch Stadium) indicate we may be looking at merely a very good spot starter rather than a potential stud-in-the-making. You should shoot for more than that with a mid-round pick.
Alternative Options: Jorge de la Rosa and Anibal Sanchez have their flaws, but they offer upside—de la Rosa has a 9.0 K/9 rate since 2008, while Sanchez’s improving fastball could hint at bigger things to come—and both can be drafted later.

Bronson Arroyo, Reds RHP
How does Arroyo do it? Over the past three seasons, he’s picked up 47 wins with a 4.25 ERA and 1.28 WHIP. Spiffy digits, especially in NL-only leagues. He consistently outperforms his xFIP by half a run or more, owing to his typically low BABIPs (.239 in 2010 was MLB’s second-lowest). That suggests this wily vet knows a thing or three about making hitters get themselves out—after all, his strikeouts plummeted to 5.05/9—while tossing 88 mph fastballs, lots of change-ups (career-high 25% last year) and plenty of other junk. Still, as a pitcher with this profile is wont to do, Arroyo also walks a very thin line between mastery and disastery. If he tricks enough hitters again, you’re missing out on a mid-3s ERA and strong WHIP available as late as Round 20, but if he proves more fool and less gold, at least you won’t have to worry about spending a month recovering from one bad outing.
Alternative Options: Owners have trouble trusting Javier Vazquez
after A Bronx Fail: Part 2 or Jason Hammel and his cringe-worthy surface stats, but either would be a better upside play this late.





Jason Catania is an MLB Lead Writer for Bleacher Report who also contributes to ESPN The Magazine, ESPN Insider and MLB Rumor Central, focusing on baseball and fantasy content. When he was first introduced to fantasy baseball, Derek Jeter had 195 career hits, Jamie Moyer had 72 wins and Matt Stairs was on team No. 3. You can follow him on Twitter: @JayCat11

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom B
15 years ago

Garza and Billingsley must be ecstatic to be mentioned in the same sentence as Cain. Neither of them have even sniffed Cain’s level of success in any year of their careers.

Tom B
15 years ago
Reply to  Tom B

I would be interested in some analysis of if the park factor adjustment for Garza outweighs the NL-switch? Does going from one of the most pitcher friendly parks (the trop) to one of the worst (wrigley) outweigh the lack of DH?

DrBGiantsfan
15 years ago
Reply to  Tom B

Cain’s elbow inflammation coupled with his workload is certainly cause for pause, and I respect Billingsley. Billz was a beast at times last year for long stretches last year. Having said that, the elbow issue seems to be a trivial concern so far. I think it’s pretty common for pitchers to have a twinge here and there and it not be anything serious.

I can see the Billz recommendation, especially if he’s available later in the draft. Garza in no way should be mentioned in the same class as Matt Cain, especially pitching in that park. He shouldn’t have a big regression from TB, but it’s also unlikely he’ll be much better.

Mattsd
15 years ago
Reply to  Tom B

Cain and Billingsley are pretty remarkably comparable.

Both are big righties drafted in the middle of the first round out of high school by NL West teams. Both dominated the minors and were top 10 overall prospects according to BA by the end of their time in the minors. Both have outperformed their xFIP significantly due to lower than normal HR/FB rates.

Career numbers:
Billingsley has a 3.55 ERA, 3.68 FIP, and 4.05 xFIP in 825 innings.

Cain has a 3.45 ERA, 3.84 FIP, and 4.43 xFIP in 1095 innings.

Billingsley gets more strikeouts, Cain has better command, and Billingsley gets more ground balls, but their profile is still very comparable.

The fact that mentioning Billingsley alongside Cain engenders this kind of reaction among many fans is EXACTLY the point of articles like these. Cain and Billingsley are very similar, but the perception of them is very different. This is precisely what makes Billingsley a better value in fantasy. He is available later and is a good bet to produce similar output.

Joe P.
15 years ago
Reply to  Mattsd

“Neither of them have even sniffed Cain’s level of success in any year of their careers.”

To add on to your excellent response, I’d point out that Bills has exceeded 4 WAR in a season twice in his career, something Cain’s yet to do.

saint
15 years ago
Reply to  Mattsd

now compare them using rally’s war (available on b-ref).

Travis
15 years ago
Reply to  Mattsd

Billz is a better pitcher in real life than in fantasy. WHIP is the most predictive fantasy stat, especially H2H leagues, so I stay away from pitchers with a high WHIP. Over the past 3 years Cain has been much better than Billingsley in fantasy production.

Matt
15 years ago

“a very thin line between mastery and disastery…”

Bravo.

Erik Archer
15 years ago

Jaimie Garcia over De Le Rosa. belee dat

gnomezMember since 2020
15 years ago
Reply to  Erik Archer

Or both.

My pitching line to start the season (in one of two league – the other is an injury-filled nightmare) is looking pretty sweet with Garcia, De La Rosa, Matt Harrison, and Jeremy Guthrie.

29.1 IP, 28 K, 6 BB, 0.31 ERA, 0.68 WHIP, 1.30 tERA.

This is a cheap rotation that won’t perform like this all year, but OMG.

DrBGiantsfan
15 years ago

I agree on the Latos recommendations. Stay away!

I can see Kuroda being of equal or slightly better value as Tim Hudson, but Daniel Hudson is a wildly speculative option.

I really like Garcia’s combination of GB tendency and K rate. I think he can keep it going. DLR is just too inconsistent and pitches in Coors Field, no thank you. Sanchez is wildly speculative.

I addressed Cain above.

I’ve never been a huge Arroyo fan, but Vasquez and Hammel don’t do anything for me either.

odditie
15 years ago

I’m not going to say you are wrong with Latos, we’ll let his performance determine that, but you are wront to say he tired at the end of the year. If you look back at those last 7 starts and the news tidbits you’ll notice that he had a mechanical issue for 2 starts and over his last 3 starts he put it back together again once they fixed it. He wasn’t dominant but he wasn’t horrible either.

Also you fail to mention he still had a great 39/8 k/bb over those final 7 starts. It’s 2 horrible starts and a small sample size more then him tiring, sorry.

Wojo
15 years ago
Reply to  odditie

I agree with Odditie.
You say Latos wore out and was only 1-5 with a 5.66ERA in his last 7 starts/35innings pitched. However, during that stretch he had a 2.65FIP, 10.03K/9, and 2.06BB/9. He had some bad luck with a .393BABIP and almost half the guys reaching base were scoring on him. I disagree with your assessment and will happily draft Latos.

Schide
15 years ago

Oh sweet I already drafted both Latos and Garcia in my slow draft. Of course I also drafted Bailey and Domonic Brown sooooo…

ms
15 years ago

So should the Cardinals have limited Garcia to 67 innings last year?

opisgod
15 years ago
Reply to  ms

Who with a brain actually follows the causation=correlation crock that is the Verducci effect anyways?

Mike H
15 years ago

Who was going to draft Bronson Arroyo?

MikeB22
15 years ago

The Verducci Effect, to me, is very misleading. Overuse as I see it would have more to do with a) pitches and not innings and b) high leverage situations vs not and c) and rest in between. I’d imagine playoff innings take a much larger toll on the body. And for some, their starts may even be pushed up, causing further strain on the arm over tie. I bet you’ll also find that pitchers with better control are less prone to the “effect”, because of less strain per use (per inning). I’d expect it would take many more innings to truly wear them down vs guys who are inefficient with their pitches.

kab21
15 years ago
Reply to  MikeB22

I’m not really a big believer of the Verducci Effect but I don’t think anyone can deny that Latos is an injury risk. For as long as I can remember him as a prospect he’s been labeled an injury risk. And he earned that label by missing parts of 2008 and 2009 with injuries.

On the positive, he has almost everything you look for in a young pitcher. He’s got great stuff, greats stats with great peripherals everywhere he’s been, pitches at Petco and he pitches in the NL. Unfortunately everybody knows this and he’s being overdrafted currently.

ryan p
15 years ago
Reply to  kab21

i’m not buying this overdrafted bit, all the talented ‘sure things’ are off the board by round 8-9 (pretty much all positions not just pitchers) …
you have to draft someone.
Latos and Cain seem like decent picks (ie not old, really talented, nice stat history) when you see who else is left and you’re look for a #2-#3 SP . the Alt’s mentioned above all have ugly spots, Oswalt isn’t getting younger, has a tough home park and arm troubles of his own in the past, Gallardo’s WHIP is an issue (this is rotographs after all and WHIP counts in most leagues) and his own injury history, Billingsley can outright lose control of his stuff, which anyone who’s owned him can vouch for and the dodger lineup isn’t looking all that special atm, and Garza… he shouldn’t even be in the conversation with any of the above mentioned pitchers, definately a tier below imo.
everyone is saying that pitching is deep this year and available late but, do you really want a staff of Chacin’s, Kennedy’s, & Volzquez’s, after you get your ace? sure it might pay off but, look at the bats you can get in the same part of the draft as Cain/Latos are going in : Konerko, Hart, C & D Young’s, Stubbs, Prado and a bunch of other uninspiring picks… I don’t see anything wrong with taking Latos here, his ceiling hasn’t been established yet and his stuff is filthy, to say his upside is the same as Oswalt’s is a stretch

Dicky V Licious
15 years ago

This might be the worst article I’ve seen posted on here. Latos will be a stud. Matt Cain is way better than the alternatives listed. Tim Hudson is dependable but nothing special. Same for Arroyo. And with Garcia your taking your late risks on upside and improvement. None of these guys are wildly overpriced and are all draftable at their going rate.

Ash
15 years ago

Mattsd thinks Cain and Billz are similar? The only thing similar about them is their road to the majors, and their physical build.

Their style of pitching is completely different, and the output you will get from them on your fantasy team is completely different. One will provide you with a strong K-rate, but a lot of walks. The other will provide you with a lesser k-rate, but better control.

I don’t see a lot of similarities in the way they pitch…you’re pretty off base there.

DG
15 years ago

Whether you agree with the Verducci effect or not- the jump in innings is a flag with Latos. However to say that he clearly tired is flat out misinformation. He suffered from some bad luck. His k/9 as well as his bb/9 continued to be excellent, he still kept the ball on the ground and in the park, the only thing that seemed to change were his hit rates and strand rates, and thus less batters faced per game.

Drafting Latos seems to be a question of how risk averse you are and who else you have rostered, as well as what your league parameters are. He will not go cheap, but other than the innings spike and the fact this will only be his 2nd full season there are no indications he cannot at least duplicate 2010.

mds
15 years ago

Avoid a Pitcher who posted four straight months of 10 k/9 and 2.5 BB/9 to end the season? Mat Latos is the man, you are not (and neither is Tom Verdouchey).

V
15 years ago
Reply to  mds

Good analysis…

So, how about that Latos, and his 2 mph dropoff?

GTW
15 years ago
Reply to  mds

Jason,

Before dealing for Garcia I was trying to recall why I was so low on him during the draft and I think the innings jump you mention is exactly why. It’s pretty cool that you came back and reviewed your list now that there are some results. Since the player pages link to articles it would seem like more authors would do this at FanGraphs.

EDGY SMART
14 years ago

I pity the fool who drafted Bills over Cain.

Christian
14 years ago
Reply to  EDGY SMART

1 out of 5 ain’t bad huh. Just drop the “n’t” off the title and noon will notice how dead wrong you were!