Five More Deviations from Consensus: Outfielders Stars

Yesterday, I used my Way Too Early rankings and our RotoGraphs outfield rankings to discuss my five biggest deviations from consensus. The comments were just a tad grumpy about my decision to focus on the Mitch Hanigers and Lonnie Chisenhalls of the world. Let it be said that I’m a man of the people. Here are five more deviations from consensus – this time focused on stars*.

*Loosely defined…

To me, these are the interesting players to discuss. I’m so tired of writing about Andrew McCutchen (spoiler, I’ll be writing about McCutchen). I’m going to let somebody else draft McCutchen this year. I’m not inclined to take the risk. My ranking reflects that decision. I can elaborate, but it’ll be tedious. You ready?

Andrew McCutchen
My Rank: 29
Consensus: 18
Way Too Early: 28

Hey look! It’s a tedious review of Andrew McCutchen. Proponents of the Pirates’ franchise icon will note that he played through nagging injuries in 2016. His .256/.336/.430 batting line with 24 home runs, 81 runs, 79 RBI, and six stolen bases was a serious disappointment. Per ESPN’s Player Rater, he still ranked 90th overall. That’s a poor return on a second round investment, but it’s still a valuable fantasy asset.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

My 29th ranking among outfielders corresponds to a 96th overall ranking. Rather than a rebound season, I’m expecting those injuries to continue nagging. Consider this: since 2010, only Robinson Cano has plate appearances. Over those seven seasons, McCutchen has never made fewer than 648 plate appearances. On the one hand, that’s incredible durability; the type that signals a specific skill in health. It also represents a ton of wear and tear on a now 30-year-old body. I figure further breakdowns are just as likely as a return to full health over 650 plate appearances. It’s an educated guess.

Wil Myers
My Rank: 13
Consensus: 21
Way Too Early: 14 or 15

I didn’t rank Myers as an outfielder in my Way Too Early series, but I did say he’d be adjacent to 14th ranked A.J. Pollock in a comment. Since then, I’ve bumped Pollock up to number 10. Myers has also climbed a short distance.

Any discussion of Myers’ value begins with stolen bases. While I don’t think he’ll repeat his 28 steal season, I still expect him to attempt 30 swipes. Toss in a slight decline in success rate and we’re left with about 20 to 25 steals over a full season. The Padres are terrible. Myers likes to run. Who’s actually going to stop him?

The other talking point is his power. The 28 home runs come with a fluky-feeling 18.7 percent HR/FB rate. Just like with steals, I expect fewer home runs. And just like with steals, I think he’ll still pop between 20 and 25. My one worry is injury. He’s proven to be a fragile player throughout his early career.

Ian Desmond
My Rank: 22
Consensus: 15
Way Too Early: 23

It’s interesting to me that most of my disagreements with the RG staff carried over from the Way Too Early series. I definitely made some large changes between November and now. With Desmond, color me unconvinced that Coors Field will be a panacea for his many flaws at the plate. Despite producing a tolerable season line while with the Rangers, he jammed all of his value into two months. He was terrible in April and worse in the second half. Over the last two years, he’s looked completely lost for two-thirds of his plate appearances.

Desmond proponents like his history of durability and 20/20 production. There’s hope that his home games will help to level out his streaky production. It’s tempting to expect 30 home runs, but Desmond rolls a ton of ground balls. He’s already relying on a high HR/FB rate just to reach 20 homers. Given the Rockies’ ridiculously potent lineup, I wonder if Desmond will be given free reign to run. I suspect we’ll see 10 to 15 steals rather than 20.

Last but not least, altitude negatively affects player health. We’ll see if his 31-year-old body holds up for a full season. For what it’s worth, I’d be ranking Desmond a lot lower if he wasn’t joining the Rockies.

Mark Trumbo
My Rank: 44
Consensus: 24
Way Too Early: 41

You know the famous saying. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, ~we won’t get fooled again!~ I have no intention of being sucked in by Trumbo’s 47 homer age 30 season. His skill set is the type that tends to age rapidly and with very little warning. Maybe he’ll be fine in 2017. After all, he’s in a great power park in a division with some homer prone pitchers. I’d rather divest a year too early.

Perhaps of relevance, I’m still fully on the bandwagon for Trumbo’s clone, Khris Davis (ranked 27, consensus 23). He’s 29. Despite my preference for Davis, I recommend finding a better athlete with actual OBP ability. Guys who get on base have a much more stable floor. Or if you like the pure power skill set, perhaps try Miguel Sano (ranked 23, consensus 32).

Kole Calhoun
My Rank: 32
Consensus: 43
Way Too Early: 32

Upon reflection, I guess Calhoun isn’t terribly interesting. He’s a candidate for 700 plate appearances while batting ahead of Mike Trout. And now that the Angels have added real, actual players to surround, Calhoun, Trout, and Albert Pujols, Calhoun should easily exceed 100 runs. There’s upside for 120 runs with a healthy 80 RBI. Or if he finds himself batting after Trout, 110 RBI are on the table.

In short, Calhoun profiles as a top notch run producer. We often preach selecting skills (i.e. power and speed) over role, but sometimes we overlook the value of run production in our rankings.





You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cavebirdMember since 2018
9 years ago

I guess the key is to get Robinson Cano; as the only one to get plate appearances since 2010 (“since 2010, only Robinson Cano has plate appearances”), he is probably the only hitter worth drafting!

Nasty Nate
9 years ago

As far as McCutchen (and position players in general), I’m not sure I buy the wear-and-tear argument. Isn’t durability in the past the best predictor of durability in the future? I trust McCutchen’s health more than other guys around his age like JD Martinez and Fowler.

Bounty
9 years ago
Reply to  Nasty Nate

I remember a time when I could pencil in Hunter Pence for 650+ PA per year.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Nasty Nate

You haven’t gotten old yet have you? It sucks!

James
9 years ago

I hope Nimrod’s tears have dried sufficiently for him to enjoy this terrific article.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  James

Why the personal attack and more concerning the up-votes? I liked the article as well.

NimrodMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  James

I did! Now we are talking about guys that are worth drafting. I like the points made about Desmond and Calhoun. Hey, I like to hunt and like the biblical references to Nimrod.

AnonMember since 2025
9 years ago

Desmond was a LOT more interesting when he had SS eligibility. Now though? I’m kind of with you – lot of question marks there with him. He’s still an everyday player in Colorado and therefore always in play, but I’m not 100% sold. However, if Story gets injured or demoted* and Desmond moves to SS then he becomes VERY interesting.

*remember that Story only has 690 PA above AA and there still have to be concerns over his K% at this point. I think he’ll be OK but you can’t ignore that he could go 190/260/340 for the 1st couple months and get sent down.

BassDefenseMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Historically yes SS is the position with greater scarcity value, but depending on size of league and number of OF slots, recently I’d argue that OF has become a more difficult position to fill. Desmond for this year at least should have more value than next assuming he really does play only 1B this year. (Still seems highly unlikely to me even for the Rockies)

carterMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon

I would be less surprised to see Story produce a top 10 fantasy season than to see him get sent down. I personally buy into Desmond at Coors. Coors field ails quite a bit. With Desmond, who I believe is mostly just way tooo much in his own head, I think Coors will help even more. He will be confident, and play in the best hitters park. All good things.

LooseMoose6
9 years ago

Nice piece, Brad.

I think you might be building too much upside into Calhoun.

Last year he put up a career best OBP in 674 PAs and still failed to score 100 runs. He hit in front of Trout from May 8th on.

He’s got a healthy floor but I don’t see more upside in the form of playing time or lineup spot.

Jim Melichar
9 years ago

I’m buying Trumbo all day long as a #2 OF. All. Day. Long. Otherwise I’m in agreement with most of the other takes. I could go either way on Desmond – Colorado couldn’t hurt, but he was also mostly average for half the year or better.

Rhedd
9 years ago

“Last but not least, altitude negatively affects player health.”

There is no evidence to support that statement. We can say that the larger dimensions in the OF will wear a player down from the additional running to cover more ground, but that is not a direct result of the altitude.

Rhedd
9 years ago
Reply to  Brad Johnson

I have reviewed that literature and the bulk of it is positive. Distance runners and cyclist used altitude acclimation to increase lung/oxygen efficiency that translates into measurable performance gains at lower altitudes.

If the statement was true then we would have seen equivalent health issues for the Denver based NFL, NBA, and NHL teams and that has just not happened.