Fantasy Storylines To Watch: Carlos Martinez
Each spring, a handful of storylines grab fantasy owners’ attention due to the vast difference in potential value on draft day. The stories could revolve around a spring position battle or the potential of a top prospect to steal a roster spot with a big spring camp. Sometimes its a rehabbing player who isn’t certain to be ready for opening day.
Perhaps an under-reported fantasy storyline is unfolding in St. Louis, and it doesn’t involve top prospect Oscar Taveras. The Cardinals suffered a blow to their starting rotation when left-hander Jaime Garcia experienced a setback with his surgically-repaired shoulder. He’s currently seeking a second opinion from Dr. James Andrews, according to ESPN.
The story isn’t really that Garcia re-injured his shoulder. Given his unfortunate injury history, the news was not shocking. It’s the repercussions of the injury that are interesting for fantasy owners. Right-handers Joe Kelly and Carlos Martinez now find themselves locked in a battle for the fifth starter role. And for the latter, the fireballing Carlos Martinez, such a transition to the starting rotation could significantly increase his fantasy value for the 2014 season.
Martinez made a name for himself on the prospect circuit by reaching triple-digits with his fastball and dominating Double-A and Triple-A the past two seasons. He then dipped his toes into the major-league pool last year as a reliever, posting a 5.08 ERA in 28.1 innings out of the bullpen. The gaudy ERA doesn’t reflect the underlying skills, though, as shown by the 3.08 FIP and 3.40 SIERA. Plus, at this point, y’all know the small-sample size lecture by heart.
Throughout his minor-league career, the 22-year-old hurler had worked exclusively as a starter, so this spring training battle isn’t about the Cardinals attempting to reshape a reliever into a starter. Instead, the question is whether his repertoire can handle a starter role and what the likely difference in fantasy value if he does get the nod as the fifth starter.
I’ve been surprised by how many people believe Martinez can make a seamless transition to the rotation with his repertoire. His fastball is devastating, he possesses an impressive prospect pedigree, and he also got hitters to swing at 33.5% of pitches outside the strike zone last year; however, being so heavily reliant on a fastball-curveball mix isn’t ideal as a starter. His changeup will not only have to be utilized more often, but it will have to improve.
Why? Carlos Martinez really struggled against lefties after his promotion. Righties hit .246/.333/.328, while lefties unloaded with a .319/.373/.391 slash line. Again, it’s important to remember the small-sample size caveat, but the concern centers around more than just those slash lines. Check out the difference in platoon peripherals:
| K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs. LHH | 4.76 | 3.18 | 1.50 | .319 |
| vs. RHH | 9.53 | 2.65 | 3.60 | .246 |
To me, the two-pitch mix combined with the massive differential in strikeout rates makes me concerned that the platoon splits would become even more pronounced as a starter, especially the second and third time through the batting order. And for how overpowering he can be, he hasn’t compiled elite strikeout rates in the minors since A-ball.
I understand he’s 22 years old and has time to develop his repertoire, but for the 2014 season, it doesn’t seem to be a slam dunk that he can transition to the starting rotation and subsequently dominate. The huge fastball and the huge ground-ball rate are both encouraging. I’m simply suggesting we need to pump the breaks on the Carlos Martinez bandwagon a bit.
The difference in fantasy value between the starting rotation and bullpen is also complicated. If Martinez doesn’t make the rotation and is the primary set-up man for the Cardinals until Jason Motte returns, it seems he’s a fringe top-30 reliever as a best-case scenario. In ESPN leagues last year, the top non-closer reliever was Luke Hochevar (yeah, that same Luke Hochevar) and he was the 26th-ranked reliever. Thus, in leagues that value saves only, Martinez isn’t anything more than a third reliever in deeper leagues.
If one sifts through the ESPN rankings for all pitchers, though, the picture becomes more complex. Hochevar was the 26th-ranked reliever, but the 77th-ranked pitcher. He ranked higher than Lance Lynn, Doug Fister, and Chris Archer. Guys like Tyler Clippard, Tommy Hunter, and David Robertson also cracked the top-100 overall pitchers in ESPN’s final rankings.
Thus, I don’t think the Carlos Martinez situation is merely contingent upon his role in 2014. He can still provide value as a reliever, whether your fantasy league values saves alone or saves and holds. For me, the more salient issue is whether his struggles against left-handers will continue in 2014. If they do, he may not offer the elite level of strikeouts one needs from a non-closing reliever, and in the rotation, he could get knocked around the second and third time through the order. It’s more about the level of success in general, rather than success in a specific role.
Dynasty and keeper leagues will likely value Carlos Martinez much more highly than redraft leagues, which is completely understandable and it should be that way. For the 2014 season, though, pay attention to the spring position battle. If he makes the starting rotation, don’t go overboard on draft day thinking his value just skyrocketed. He possesses definite upside, but he’s displayed significant issues against left-handed batters and will likely face an innings limit. Top prospects command a lot of attention and are often overvalued as a result. Carlos Martinez is a great arm and appears to have a bright future, but even 120 innings of Gerrit Cole posting a low-3.00s ERA last year only ranked as the #93 overall pitcher in ESPN leagues.
As a fantasy owner in non-keeper leagues this year, giving him the opportunity to dominate out of the bullpen sounds much better than potentially mediocre numbers with an innings limit in the starting rotation. Though neither option will make him any more than a late-round draft pick in deeper leagues.
J.P. Breen is a graduate student at the University of Chicago. For analysis on the Brewers and fantasy baseball, you can follow him on Twitter (@JP_Breen).
Is anyone else sick of fantasy analysis ignoring the very facet of replacement players that is so often preached?
Gerrit Cole may have been the #93 pitcher due to his 120 innings last year, but let’s not pretend like fantasy teams don’t have benches and waiver wires that an owner could use to extract value prior to that 120 inning call-up.
In reality, the measure we should be using is how valuable was he in the time frame he was ACTUALLY pitching? Those 120 innings are banked and well above average. Anything else an owner can do with that roster spot in the other ’80 innings’ is just gravy, especially in a H2H league.
Yes and No. League rules have a lot to do with this (e.g., bench depth, transaction frequency) as does how the playing time is compiled (Is the pitcher shut down in August or does he get play the whole season on a severe pitch count or getting starts skipped?). But, yes, under certain conditions a player can be valued by their rate stats (on a per game basis) and not their season totals.
Do we have splits for his time spent in minors? You warn about small sample size but then proceed to use his performance against the entirety of 46 AB’s from lefties last year as his main drawback. Would be curious to know if these splits were something that he showed in the minors as well.
He also pointed out that he doesn’t have a weapon against LHH. So bad, but small, sample against LHH and no weapon against them gives me reason to think that he’ll continue to show large splits, even if he brings his triple slash against LHH down.
Yes. In 2012, his line against LHB was a decent 259/335/408 for 743 OPS in 169 PA, vs. 592 OPS against RHB.
And in 2013, he was much better in the minors than the small MLB sample. Baseball reference lumps all 2013 stats (major and minors) together, and he was significantly better vs LHB 273/330/368. Just ballparking it, I think that makes him about 240/300/330 in the minors. You can do the math yourself at http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=matias001car&type=pgl&year=2013
And in 2011 (Hi-A and Low-A ball), he had a reverse split, with a .213 BA vs LHB. Not sure how relevant Single-A ball is, but bottom line, I wouldn’t worry overmuch about his splits based on just 28 IP in MLB. If it persists after 120 IP, then we can start to worry.
I own both CMart and Kelly in a h2h 16 team keeper league.
$4 for this year, $3 each year there after. $150 total budget
Keep one? both? ditch?
As a bonus, martinez is a twitter porn aficionado :
http://deadspin.com/the-cardinals-are-very-embarrassed-by-carlos-martinezs-1530572369
Yep, he’s got his own stash of “fantasy storylines” already.
Man there are some talented young pitchers this year. I’m curious what people think of these 4 guys purely on value of Yeahoos draft rank and real value.
Danny Salazar – 115
Michael Wacha – 102
Sonny Gray
Wait I fucked that up I wasn’t done yet. Shit!
Man there are some talented young pitchers this year. I’m curious what people think of these 4 guys purely on value of Yeahoos draft rank and real value.
Danny Salazar – 115
Michael Wacha – 102
Sonny Gray – 173
Carlos Martinez – 697!
Considering you could get Martinez off the waiver wire that’s not bad. I like Salazar overall as a player a little more than Gray, but 5 rounds later Gray should be a hell of a bargain. I don’t understand Wacha’s spike in velo at the end of the year last year. I’m not fully onboard with him. I guess I will just rank 3 of them since Martinez won’t be drafted in a lot of drafts.
1. Gray
2. Salazar
3. Wacha
What do you y’all think? Any other young fellows that strike your fancy?
Biggest issue with Carlos Martinez and starting is his durability. The most IP he’s ever thrown was 108, last year, which includes postseason. And even in the minors as a SP he’s averaged less than 5 IP per start.
There’s a good article on this here: http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/2014/2/19/5424646/carlos-martinez-illusory-starter
“brakes”
Serious Question, why is Martinez not considered a 2014 Rookie? It looks like the Cardinals specifically sent him down in late August and then called him up for in September for this specific reason. He is right at the 45 day threshold for service time and looking at his transaction dates he should be a 2014 rookie.
Can someone help me with this?
I just looked up this article because I was curious why Carlos Martinez is so hyped when is K projections aren’t very impressive. Great article! (But I don’t think that usage of “gaudy” works.)