Dollar-for-Dollar All-Stars
In the comments to my keeper round-up last week, reader/commenter LuckyStrikes wrote:
I’d like to see an Ottoneu article highlighting the top 10 players whose value far exceeded their salary from 2011 and those players primed to do so in 2012.
Well, I can’t quite do that, but I am going to try to give you something (sort of) close (I think). I’ve taken the keeper data for points leagues and the 2011 point totals for each player to calculate the points/dollar for the average price at which each player was kept, and I am going to take a look at the best and worst values out there.
Three quick notes on methodology before we start. First, by the nature of the data, this is inherently backwards looking. It probably has some value for considering players in 2012, but this is really a look at players who most exceeded their value in 2011. But while a guy like Matt Moore looks unimpressive on a pts/$ basis in 2011, he wasn’t kept because of 2011, but because of the potential for 2012. The data doesn’t do him justice. Second, to account for this, I left out of the analysis anyone who had fewer than 200 plate appearances, fewer than 20 relief appearances or fewer than 10 starts (I used a thresh hold of Relief Appearances+2*Starts>20 for pitchers who appeared in both roles). This is to account for the issue described above. Finally, I focused on FanGraphs Points leagues because a) points are easy to calculate with and b) this is the most popular format.
With that in mind, here is a table that outlines the two most valuable position player keepers, based on pts/average salary, by price band.
Price Band | Player | 2011 Points | Average Salary | Pts/$ |
---|---|---|---|---|
>$3 | Alex Avila | 831.2 | $3.32 | 250.4 |
Casey Kotchman | 710.0 | $3.17 | 224.0 | |
>$5 | Carlos Lee | 804.0 | $5.35 | 150.3 |
Michael Morse | 901.0 | $6.00 | 150.2 | |
>$10 | Michael Young | 971.1 | $11.21 | 86.6 |
Aramis Ramirez | 913.5 | $11.40 | 80.1 | |
>$15 | Jacoby Ellsbury | 1205.0 | $15.22 | 79.2 |
Curtis Granderson | 1102.1 | $15.86 | 69.5 | |
>$20 | Brandon Phillips | 866.0 | $20.48 | 42.3 |
Ian Kinsler | 1023.8 | $25.07 | 40.8 | |
>$25 | Ian Kinsler | 1023.8 | $25.07 | 40.8 |
Matt Kemp | 1260.3 | $31.64 | 39.8 | |
>$30 | Matt Kemp | 1260.3 | $31.64 | 39.8 |
Jose Bautista | 1257.3 | $31.72 | 39.6 | |
>$35 | Prince Fielder | 1200.4 | $42.57 | 28.2 |
Miguel Cabrera | 1286.4 | $49.71 | 25.9 |
It should be clear from the start why this had to be done by price band – not surprisingly a number of $3 players (remember, with the salary increases, $3 is the lowest possible price for a Major League player) led the way, by virtue of their low salary. Lee would be the 32nd highest rated player if we ignored salary bands, behind guys such as Jamey Carroll, Omar Infante, and the incomparable Yuniesky Betancourt. Alex Avila is your grand champion, the most productive player, dollar-for-dollar. That probably surprises no one – you would expect a breakout youngster with low expectations to top the charts. And I would say that there are few players I would rather keep at their price than Avila at $3. I did not, however, expect to see Kotchman so high, and I doubt he will fair as well in 2012.
Those two players in the >$5 price band are so interesting because of the expectations around them from past years. Morse is widely considered a breakout player who put up incredible numbers for a low investment; Lee is widely considered washed up. And yet, they put up pretty similar numbers, dollar for dollar. Would I rather have Morse in 2012? Absolutely. But while Morse was kept in 90% of leagues, Lee was cut in almost half. If people value him at less than $5, and you can grab him for a couple bucks next year, I bet you’ll like the outcome.
Kinsler and Kemp both managed to jump a price band, outperforming a lot of guys priced cheaper than them, but the king of that category is Miggy. At more than $49, he managed to be the second best value among players almost $15 cheaper. And his value will only go up with 3B eligibility. Pretty impressive.
Finally, on a pretty unimportant, but sort of odd note, how many of those bands have guys who play the same position? Morse/Lee, Young/Ramirez, Ellsbury/Granderson, Phillips/Kinsler, Kemp/Bautista, Fielder/Cabrera. Not sure it means anything – maybe someone else can find a rationale for this?
As for the pitchers:
Price Band | Player | 2011 Points | Average Salary | Pts/$ |
---|---|---|---|---|
>$3 | Doug Fister | 1083.7 | $3.42 | 316.9 |
Jason Vargas | 792.0 | $3.09 | 264.0 | |
>$5 | Ervin Santana | 921.3 | $5.04 | 182.8 |
Carl Pavano | 871.0 | $5.00 | 174.2 | |
>$10 | James Shields | 1148.7 | $11.32 | 101.5 |
Matt Garza | 1004.0 | $10.71 | 93.7 | |
>$15 | Chris Carpenter | 1177.7 | $19.70 | 59.8 |
Matt Cain | 1133.3 | $23.59 | 48.0 | |
>$20 | Matt Cain | 1133.3 | $23.59 | 48.0 |
Jered Weaver | 1137.3 | $23.89 | 47.6 | |
>$25 | Dan Haren | 1201.7 | $26.78 | 44.9 |
David Price | 1055.7 | $26.93 | 39.2 | |
>$30 | Clayton Kershaw | 1296.7 | $33.14 | 39.1 |
Justin Verlander | 1263.0 | $34.35 | 36.8 | |
>$35 | Cliff Lee | 1261.3 | $38.76 | 32.5 |
Roy Halladay | 1361.3 | $44.43 | 30.6 |
Again, price bands are clearly important. This time Santana would have been 27th overall. You’ll also notice that the lower-band pitchers are all better values than their offensive counterparts. This is most likely a result of two things: first, pitching is more volatile so the opportunity for a guy to put up an unexpectedly big year is greater; and second, fantasy players know pitching is more volatile and tend to discount the prices accordingly, meaning that the pitchers who do succeed are better values, on average, balancing out the pitchers who flop.
This time the guys who leap-frog a price-band are Cain, Lee and Halladay. The latter two, though, benefit from a lack of competition – only 10 pitchers were kept at over $30 (including George Sherrill in one league, who I imagine is a placeholder, not a keeper), compared to 31 position players.
I was also surprised to see not one reliever make the cut. Considering how under-priced some relievers are, I figured there would be some great pt/$ values. But the highest value pitcher was Alfredo Aceves, at 169.7 pts/$, which ranked 32nd. The highest ranked full-time reliever (Aceves made four starts in 2012) was David Robertson, whose 160.8 pts/$ placed him 42nd overall.
Finally, for those curious the lowest value keepers were Brian Matusz (1.8 pts/$) and Jeff Mathis (7.4 pts/$). Mathis was only kept in one league, so if we limit ourselves to players kept at least twice, your low value position player is Hanley Ramirez, whose $47.77 salary netted just 409.6 points, for a ratio of 8.6.
A long-time fantasy baseball veteran and one of the creators of ottoneu, Chad Young's writes for RotoGraphs and PitcherList, and can be heard on the ottobot podcast. You can follow him on Twitter @chadyoung.
Instead of total points, doing some kind of “points above replacement level” might help with the price band issue. The tricky thing is determining exactly how to establish the replacement level (and would it differ by position?), but then you don’t have the Yuni B’s of the world coming out with such large values.
I did a down-and-dirty version of this after seeing your comment: (Pts-300)/$. Chose 300 because that left me with 250ish offensive players above replacement level, which is probably about the right number (250ish on offense, 180ish pitching, 50ish prospects? That is a total guess). It definitely helped, but the top 10 were still all cheap guys and there was still no one in the top 50 with a salary over $10. Could be 300 pts is too low for a replacement level, could be there is a better way to account for this all together.