Does Inflation Increase As A League Gets Older?
The answer to the question posed in the headline is yes, but with some caveats. Last month I wrote about the Ottoneu Surplus Calculator, and one of the takeaways at the end of that article was that post-keeper deadline the calculator could be used to calculate inflation. What I’ve done is gone through every Fangraphs Points league in ottoneu and ran those leagues through the Surplus Calculator to gather data on keepers and inflation, in an attempt to get a general sense of how auction keeper leagues (like ottoneu) evolve over time with respect to inflation. Before I present that data, though, I want to explain what inflation is and why you should care about it.
What is inflation?
Here is a useful article posted to RotoGraphs two years ago detailing the process of calculating inflation, so I won’t bother rehashing that information here. For our purposes, just understand that inflation is the result of league owners keeping players whose true value exceeds their salaries. When that happens, there is less value available at the auction than there is money to spend, so prices are higher than they would otherwise be. As an example, assume you play in an ottoneu league and the players kept past the keeper deadline have $3,000 in salaries, and $3,300 in value according to the values you are using (these could be the values from our positional rankings here on RotoGraphs, the ones included with the Surplus Calculator, or ones you have calculated yourself). Given the $400 salary cap in ottoneu, there is $4,800 total cap for the entire 12 owner league. That leaves $1,800 ($4,800 less $3,000 in kept salaries) in salaries for teams to spend at auction, but only $1,500 ($4,800 less $3,300 in kept value) in talent for them to spend it on, so every $1.00 in value requires $1.20 in salary. So in this example the league has 20% inflation.
Why is knowing inflation useful? Well, once you’ve calculated the inflation rate for your league, you can adjust your auction values by that inflation percentage to calculate an inflation-adjusted auction value for that player. Assuming the same 20% inflation we looked at above, that means the $30 OF you have on your auction values sheet should have an adjusted auction value of $36 ($30 + $6 inflation) It’s important to know what your inflation adjusted values are, because if you were to stick to your true dollar values you would find yourself not winning any players at the auction until only role players were remaining. By making adjustments to your auction values for inflation, you have a truer representation of each player’s value for that particular league.
The Data
The data I collected comes from every Fangraphs Points ottoneu league that had exactly 12 active owners, and I excluded any league that had a team over the $400 salary cap (usually this was due to a team not cutting players by the deadline). The table below represents a subtotal of all the data broken out by the age of the league. In this case the oldest leagues are the ones entering their sixth seasons, and the newest leagues are the ones entering their second. I calculated the average first place team’s projected $ value (based on keeper quality + how much value that team could acquire at auction based on inflation), the average number of keepers, the average salary kept, the average value kept, the average surplus (value less salary), and the average inflation % for each league age.

| League Age | Proj 1st | # Keepers | Salary Kept | Value Kept | Surplus | Inflation |
| Sixth Year Leagues | $549 | 294 | $3,239 | $3,553 | $314 | 30.8% |
| Fifth Year Leagues | $546 | 296 | $3,293 | $3,530 | $236 | 23.0% |
| Fourth Year Leagues | $535 | 301 | $3,288 | $3,451 | $163 | 14.2% |
| Third Year Leagues | $537 | 288 | $3,237 | $3,466 | $229 | 21.2% |
| Second Year Leagues | $507 | 271 | $3,173 | $3,197 | $25 | 1.0% |
| Grand Average | $536 | 291 | $3,252 | $3,453 | $200 | 18.8% |
What does the data tell us?
- There is an anomaly that exists with the fourth year leagues, and I haven’t been able to identify the cause(s). It’s possible this is just a small sample size issue, as each league age “bucket” had only about a dozen leagues in the sample.
- Assuming the fourth year leagues are truly an anomaly, in general ottoneu inflation increases as a league gets older. Second year leagues have a miniscule 1% inflation, third and fourth year leagues average about 18% inflation, fifth year leagues have 23% inflation, and sixth year leagues have just under 31% inflation.
- In addition to inflation increasing as a league gets older, the projected value of the first place team also increases, from a low of $507 for second year leagues to a high of $549 for sixth year leagues. This is highly correlated with inflation itself, but it also tells us that as ottoneu leagues age the very best teams in the league look stronger and stronger. It’s no great surprise then that some of the highest points totals in the history of ottoneu have come from the oldest leagues.
- Second year leagues keep fewer players (271) than any other league age, but the other four league ages are pretty similar in keeping about 295 players.
- There isn’t a huge disparity in how much teams spend on keeper salaries, as leagues overall spend $3,252 on average on keeper salaries
I’ll leave any other possible conclusions for the readers to point out, and I definitely plan on taking a look at this data again next season to see if any of the information changes with another season in the books.
Justin is a life long Cubs fan who has been playing fantasy baseball for 20+ years, and an ottoneu addict since 2012. Follow him on Twitter @justinvibber.
I’m in a keeper league that was started in 1984. Our rules are understandably antiquated (4 x 4, as per the original Okrent Rotisserie book). And yes, inflation is extreme.
Is this a league where everyone knows each other in real life (ie something beyond the league play itself that keeps the league together?)
Yes of course, we’re all high school friends (one expansion team that joined later is a college friend of two original members). But we get together the weekend before opening day every year for our auction draft/reunion. I’ve been doing this so long, and I’ve never joined another league, so it’s hard to imagine being at all invested in a league with strangers. We also don’t play for money, so I suppose that’s the factor that would keep your attention.
Inflation is the biggest killer of long-term leagues – and it looks like ottoneu isn’t adjusting enough for it. Obviously, just like real-world inflation, the beneficiaries like it and resist anything to fix it. But in a fantasy world where the non-beneficiaries can simply drop out, it becomes more difficult for the league to attract a rational new owner. ‘Taking over a rebuild’ just becomes a sucker’s bet – and at some point you run out of suckers. So the league dies and the beneficiaries then lose their advantage.
I think a major factor in how inflation occurs within a league has to do with whether or not there is an escalation factor or limits for keepers. We have a 8-year old NL-Only league with a $5 annual escalation on keepers, but not limit on keepers per team. The result is that over the last few years escalation has crept down slowly as the stars become more expensive. The influx of talented rookies in the past few years has worked to offset some of the decrease in escalation, but it currently looks like 2017 is going to be an interesting year where a lot of high-end players go unkept due to the high prices it would take to keep them.
I have an idea on the 4th year leagues inflation drop: Keepers going back into the pool.
Just my first thought at seeing the numbers. My 12 team mixed league has 3 year keepers so our first year we overpaid not knowing any better than come around year 4 we were in much better shape to properly assess players.
Just a thought, I mean, if the sample size is only about 12 3 or 4 leagues having that set up would factor a lot more.
Given this knowledge, what’s the best way to zig when others are zagging? Or is this a situation where the fact that less talent is in FA means you should also keep more players even if it inflates the draft pool more?
This uncovers one principle: Player skill changes at a faster rate than arbitration can account for. The total amount of surplus value available increases each season.
Of course, surplus value and inflation have an inverse relationship. Auction prices will increase each season. The “counter” to this phenomenon is use total surplus to forecast the inflation rate, and use this to generate a keep/cut line in the offseason. if a player is worth $30, but inflation is 30%, then you should be willing to keep him at $39, since that is what his auction price should be.
We add 25% for each keeper who is kept in their second year. This helps with inflation for stars, but greatly increases the value of young players that you can get late, stash on your roster for a year, keep them at like $3 and then have them for years if they hit.
The fact we have a 5 keeper limit helps reduce the value in doing this and the result is that several teams are elsewhere on the win curve and pay for higher priced stars, while the teams trying to rebuild over a couple of seasons stash young players at the trade deadline to keep for the future.
Justin, pull out league 354 from your sample and see what happens. Remember, this is the league (I’m in it) that was 13 teams until last year. We folded an entire team and threw the tire roster back in the pool, but for three years we arbed different, rostered 40 more players. So we actually show negative inflation.
Maybe run a manova, because these numbers aren’t convincing me that inflation amongst leagues 3 years old and older is significantly different.
Response blog post:
https://economyleaguebaseball.wordpress.com/2016/02/18/dynasty-leagues-are-growing-up/