Buy Low on Corey Kluber
It is with the permission and endorsement of the founder of the Corey Kluber Society, Carson Cistulli, that I urge you to buy low on Corey Kluber. Right now. He is scheduled to pitch this Saturday at home versus the Blue Jays, a neutral offense based on wRC+ so far this season. With only three starts to date, any solid start could have a dramatic impact on his 5.40 ERA. I think it will start with this one.
You probably don’t need the Society to tell you to buy low on pitchers with atypically high BABIPs this early in the season. Cliff Lee has a .431 BABIP, and his ERA will likely drop from 5.50. Homer Bailey has a .429 BABIP, and his ERA will likely drop from 8.16. Kluber is fourth on that list—behind Lee, Bailey, and Madison Bumgarner, who has still managed to keep his ERA in check despite a .440 BABIP—with a .411 BABIP. Kluber’s 8.64 strikeouts and 1.62 walks per nine innings are in line with his 8.31 and 2.02 rates from last year when he carried a 3.85 ERA for the season. In fact, Kluber’s 3.31 FIP is almost identical to his 3.30 FIP from 2013. It stands to reason that his ERA will fall in line if he continues to pitch this way.
Kluber is not unusual as a victim of the small-sample madness of the first few weeks of the new season. However, I do think circumstances have conspired to make him particularly vulnerable, and those circumstances have just improved.
To date, only the Minnesota Twins have been worse defensively in the outfield than the Indians based on the combined Defensive Runs Saved totals of the three outfield positions. The Indians have lost eight runs in the outfield, and almost all of it has been the result of Nyjer Morgan and Michael Brantley in center field. Morgan, specifically, has already cost them five runs in just eight games. That is tied for the worst total in baseball.
Having a terrible defensive outfield is a problem for Kluber because he allows a lot of flyballs. In fact, Kluber has been in the top five of qualified starters in both flyball rate and BABIP this season. I believe those two facts are related.
| Name | Team | Team OF DRS | BABIP | GB% | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Harang | Braves | 8 | 0.191 | 25.0% | 0.96 |
| Yu Darvish | Rangers | -3 | 0.211 | 28.9% | 0.00 |
| Ubaldo Jimenez | Orioles | 0 | 0.380 | 30.2% | 7.31 |
| Hector Santiago | Angels | 3 | 0.313 | 30.6% | 4.96 |
| Corey Kluber | Indians | -8 | 0.411 | 32.1% | 5.40 |
There are several reasons a pitcher could allow an atypical BABIP in a handful of starts, but I don’t think it is coincidence that Kluber has had terrible outfield defense and allowed a high BABIP and Aaron Harang has had a tremendous outfield defense and allowed a low BABIP.
The reason I think things are about to get a lot better for Kluber is the return of Michael Bourn. Bourn played his first game of the year yesterday following a hamstring injury that put him on the DL to start the season. Over the last five years, Bourn has saved his teams 65 runs in center field. That is tied with Jason Heyward for the fourth-highest total among players at all positions. It is only one run shy of Carlos Gomez’s outfield-leading total. The Indians may well be replacing the worst center field defender in baseball with the best one.
The early numbers have been unkind, but Kluber has answered his breakout 2013 season with similar peripherals so far in 2014. With Michael Bourn back to stabilize his defensive outfield, the results should start to reflect the excellent pitcher Kluber is.
We know you play in all sorts of leagues. So to help you fine-tune the analysis you’d like to read, we’ve added three tags to the categories on the right: Roto, Head to Head, and Daily Fantasy Update. Use these to get the information that is most relevant to your leagues!
Scott Spratt is a fantasy sports writer for FanGraphs and Pro Football Focus. He is a Sloan Sports Conference Research Paper Competition and FSWA award winner. Feel free to ask him questions on Twitter – @Scott_Spratt
Anyone starting salzar vs. Detroit today?
I would, if I had him
I am starting him. The Ks are worth it even if he blows up again like last start.
2013 was a breakout? A WHIP over 1.20 and only 10QS does not sound like a break out type of year.
30th in FIP and 12th in xFIP among major league starters with at least 100 innings sounds like a breakout for a guy who came into the season with zero expectations. (Not to mention a top-30 K% and the 18th best K-BB%, right alongside Homer Bailey and Cole Hamels.)
those are nice, but this is rotographs and from a fantasy perspective not many leagues i play in count FIP or xFIP as categories.
That’s a nice point, but this is rotographs where we look at statistics that are more indicative of true past performance in predicting future performance than WHIP and QSs.
I’m seeing 11th best K/BB ratio and 26th in FIP…
Are Kluber lovers still all in after another underwhelming performance this weekend?
It’s worth noting that Michael Bourn sat for that game against Toronto. I have no idea how much affect that really had on his performance for that game, but it is to the point of this article.
Anyone dropping Ian Kennedy or Rick Porcello for Kluber?
Not Kennedy: his FIP is better than Kluber’s and his velocity is up over last year.
Actually, 147 innings with an xFIP of 3.10 and a swinging strike % of 10.4 is a breakout…
Last year, only six starters (min 100IP) matched or surpassed Kluber in both K% (22.3% or higher) and BB% (5.6% or lower). They are: Matt Harvey, Felix Hernandez, Chris Sale, Cliff Lee, Adam Wainwright, and Cole Hamels. Not bad company.
And K-BB is the simplest, best ERA estimator.
Would the fact I just traded Porcello and Kluber away for Homer Bailey be seen as a win then?
I’d say yes.
should i drop jesse chavez or tyson ross for kluber?
I would drop Ross for Kluber but definitely not Chavez
Why would you drop Ross?
Velocity is down from last year
Ross seems to be having significant control issues.
Thanks. Will keep an eye on Ross’s start tonight vs SF.
I mean Friday night…
I don’t think it’s completely fair to lump the Klubes’ woes entirely on his outfield defense. He is a sinkerballer, yet is in the bottom 5 of GB% at 32.1% (108th place) after being 38th last year (if he had qualified) at 45.5%. It seems like he is not getting the desired result out of his sinker, which would be a ground ball, and maybe just isn’t throwing it that well right now.
The Pitchf/x data looks a bit whacky for 4-seam vs. sinker for last year to this year, but I am assuming his fastballs are all sinkers and he is throwing them at a comparable, if slightly increased, rate.
I say this as a Kluber fan and owner from last year who whiffed on drafting him this season.
Should I be dropping Porcello or Skaggs for Kluber ??
both… easily
Salazar can’t be started until he shows at least 1 good start.
He’s getting blown up and even if he gives 12 Ks, he’s a 1 category contributor right now. Too short of outings for a W and his era/whip is horrible.
Corey Kluber or Tim Lincecum? Any and al advice is greatly appreciated, thank you.
I checked and they were right next to each other in the preseason RotoGraphs consensus rankings. I’d side with Lincecum because of park + NL, which makes him easier to spot start in a shallower format. I think Kluber is a better actual pitcher, though.
I dropped Kluber like a rotten tomato. Tired of watching him wreck my pitching categories.
I bought into the fangraphs lovefest and to date have watched my W/L, ERA, WHIP get destroyed by Kluber. I don’t know what kind of leagues fangraphs plays in, but a 5.40 ERA with a 1.70 WHIP and marginal BB/K ratios is hardly worthy of wasting breath on.
For fantasy purposes, I could care less about poor fielding backing him up. All I see is 1-2 with terrible ratios. Sure, for fangraphs I can see the interest statistically of how he actually compares to other pitchers.
Dropped him for Hudson. Which brings up an interesting point. Fangraphs seems to have problems with pitchers like Hudson and, say, Lohse. Essentially they seem to be dismissed because of the lack of K. I understand the bias towards K statistically, but both of those pitchers are generally quite decent for fantasy purposes. When they are pitching well they give exceptional ERA and WHIP and often W, along with low BB, sacrificing K. Assuming you have other plus K producers, who cares.
Oh, someone else who would have largely been dismissed if looking at K rate and FIP/xFIP? Tom Glavine.
I agree Kluber is far overrated on this site. His proponents will point to things such as his unlucky BABIP and shiny FIP. If you even do a cursory check of his history, you can see several trends.
1. He has a terrible strand rate. Going back even deep into his minor league career, he generally sits at ~69%. Zips and Steamer both predict his strand rate to be around this number.
2. His BABIP will likely be higher than an average pitcher. Again, check his history (.342 in 2012, .329 in 2013). So he has been a little unlucky at .390 to this point, but you can’t expect tons of regression. Apparently the dude gets hit hard given his line drive rate.
Those trends should tell you NOT to reference FIP to defend the guy. So you are left with a decent strikeout rate ~8 K/9, low walk rate 2-2.5 BB/9, and tons of hits. He might work as a back-end fantasy starter depending on your league and rotation, but I don’t understand the lovefest.
Actually this past weekend proves the point that his outfield makes a difference…Swisher made an error that was that wasn’t scored an error in leading to a two run first inning.
Society meeting next start?
When the great Kluber’s acedom is forgotten,
elite 9 inning 11 k games appear.
It is always present within in the Kluber,
merely forgotten by the masses.
He who doubts the Kluber,
misses his greatest games.
Trust the Kluber.
Indeed, Ayrahvon. Indeed.
Since his 4/24 start, Kluber has:
3 Ws in 5 starts
11.97 k/9
2.04 era
1.49 fip
1.82 xfip