Author Archive

Sunday Night Waiver Wire & FAAB Chat

7:31
Hill: Jeff, Thanks for doing these as always…..Which of Logan Allen and Bibee is likely to have the run in the rotation and what would you put for FAAB percentage wise in OC?

7:31
Jeff Zimmerman: I’ll answer this and then drop the FAAB results

7:33
Jeff Zimmerman: I ranked Allen over Bibee based on his “stuff” numbers. They are really close otherwise. I’m guessing we are in the Bradley/Miller range of 10% to 50% to get one of them

7:33
Jeff Zimmerman:

7:33
Jeff Zimmerman: Here are the results of the two 15-team Tout Wars leagues.

7:34
Guest: Trying to figure out a FAAB % on Myles Straw. What would be your range?

Read the rest of this entry »


Waiver Wire & FAAB Report (Week 6)

In the article, I cover the players using CBS’s (about 40% or less initial roster rate) and Yahoo’s ADD/DROP rates. Both hosting sites have the option for daily and weekly waiver wire adds. CBS uses a weekly change while Yahoo looks at the last 24 hours. Yahoo is a great snapshot of right now while CBS ensures hot targets from early in the week aren’t missed. The players are ordered for redraft leagues by my rest-of-season preference grouped by starters, relievers, and hitters. Read the rest of this entry »


Lineup Analysis (4/28/23)

American League

Angels

Brandon Drury (.824 OPS, 5 HR, 0 SB) has started in eight of the last 10 games.

Chad Wallach (.978 OPS) and Matt Thaiss (.814 OPS) are splitting the catching duties. Read the rest of this entry »


Why RotoGraphs Is Infatuated with the NFBC

There are been complaints about being FanGraphs being NFBC (National Fantasy Baseball Championship) centric (e.g. Big Kid Adds) and we should consider other league types. The deal is that besides a few exceptions, the NFBC provides a superior product to analyze drafts and in-season player movement.

First off, I know there are leagues just as or more competitive than the NFBC, but are their drafts and rosters movements made public like the NFBC. Just last week you could notice that I was ranked 2457th out of 2460 teams in the Online Championship. Having the information available is huge. Read the rest of this entry »


Big Kid Adds (Week 5)

While the NFBC Main Event garners most of the attention, there are a handful of leagues with even a larger entry fee ($2.5K to $15K). They get originally named “High Stakes Leagues” and this year there are nine of them. With so much money on the line, these fantasy managers are going to try to gain any advantage. Most of the time, these managers will be a week or two ahead of everyone else on their adds. Here are the players and some information on the ones added in four or more of these leagues. Read the rest of this entry »


Sunday Night Waiver Wire & FAAB Chat

7:31
Jeff Zimmerman: Good evening ladies and gents. I’ll try to get to the FAAB and waiver wire questions first.

7:32
Jeff Zimmerman: Here are the FAAB results from the two 15-mixed Tout Wars leagues.

7:32
Jeff Zimmerman:

7:32
Guest: Team dependent, of course, but is Julien worth keeping around for a bit?

7:33
Jeff Zimmerman: Nope, this was the worry last week with Polanco coming back

7:33
Kelly: J Duran or Suwinski ROS?

Read the rest of this entry »


Waiver Wire & FAAB Report (Week 5)

In the article, I cover the players using CBS’s (about 40% or less initial roster rate) and Yahoo’s ADD/DROP rates. Both hosting sites have the option for daily and weekly waiver wire adds. CBS uses a weekly change while Yahoo looks at the last 24 hours. Yahoo is a great snapshot of right now while CBS ensures hot targets from early in the week aren’t missed. The players are ordered for redraft leagues by my rest-of-season preference grouped by starters, relievers, and hitters. Read the rest of this entry »


Lineup Analysis (4/21/23)

American League

Angels

Gio Urshela, Jake Lamb, Brandon Drury, and Luis Rengifo may not be startable or even rosterable until one wins a full-time starting spot between first and second base.

Zach Neto (.136/.240/.227) has started six straight games. Read the rest of this entry »


Early Results of the Shift Alterations

As everyone knows, the shift was banned for this season with players needing to be on the infield dirt and just two on each side of second base. I’m going to take an early glance to see if more hits are happening because of the extra holes in the infield and shallow outfield. Overall, the results ended up close to expectations but are noisy in some spots.

For the shift information, I’m using two rates, the full and strategic shift designations. For clarification, here is the explanation of the “strategic” shift from Baseball Savant.

A “strategic” shift is our current catch-all for positioning that is neither “standard,” nor “three infielders to one side of second base.” More granular categories, like “guarding the lines,” “five infielders,” etc., may be added in the future.

Examples of this often include just a single player being out of position, like a second baseman being shifted to short right while no other fielders are, as in the image above, or a shortstop moving very close to the second base bag, outside of the usual shortstop zone, but not quite moving to the other side of it.

During the offseason, I examined how the shift might affect individual players and the league-wide BABIP. For The Process, I looked at players moving from the full to the strategic shift. I used the strategic values since defenders could still move around this, just not as much as before. It was far from perfect, but I felt it was better than assuming no shift. Here are my conclusions from the book.

Jeff looked at into several solutions, including taking handedness into account, and ended up with the following formula to estimate a player’s change in BABIP:

BABIP Gained = Full Shift%^2 * 0.035

League-wide in 2022, 34% of all shifts were a full shift, so using the above formula, the league-wide BABIP is expected to jump by .004. On the whole, not that much.

And here are expected individual hitter BABIP gains for various full shift amounts.

Full Shift% Rate and Expected BABIP Jump With No Shift
Full Shift% BABIP Change
90% .028
80% .022
70% .017
60% .013
50% .009
40% .006
30% .003
20% .001
10% .000
0% .000
The Process

On the league-wide value, I was off a bit with the league-wide value so far going from .243 to .249 or .006. Close.

As for the individual players, I bucketed the players into 10% point groups for anyone who hit in both 2022 and 2023. Then I found the Harmonic mean of the plate appearances to help weigh the yearly change. First, I bucketed just the full shift values.

2022 Full Shift% Rate and 2023 BABIP & AVG Weighted Changes
Full Shift% BABIP Change AVG Change Count
> 90% .013 .019 8
80% to 90% .013 .006 23
70% to 80% .022 .012 33
60% to 70% .010 .007 29
50% to 60% -.004 -.009 29
40% to 50% -.016 -.009 39
30% to 40% .005 -.010 27
20% to 30% .014 .018 37
10% to 20% -.001 .001 65
<10% .002 -.001 111
>65% .017 .009 81

The top and bottom 20% came out near expectations with decent jumps for the most shifted players and no change for those who weren’t shifted. Now in the middle, values bounced all over the place.

I wondered if those in the middle were being strategically shifted a bunch and adding those shift values might clean up the results. I reran the test with the full and strategic shift rates combined. Here are the results.

2022 Full + Strategic Shift% Rate and 2023 BABIP & AVG Weighted Changes
Full and Strategic Shift BABIP Change AVG Change Count
> 90% .019 .022 21
80% to 90% .018 .006 43
70% to 80% .006 -.002 32
60% to 70% -.008 -.001 29
50% to 60% -.027 -.021 39
40% to 50% .030 .015 34
30% to 40% .004 .010 49
20% to 30% .000 .004 71
<20% .002 -.002 83
>65 .014 .007 114

The results stayed the same. The top and bottom 20% are nice and clean while the middle bounces around.

In both cases, I highlighted the results for those who see the particular shift two-thirds of the time. In each case, there was about a 15-point jump in BABIP and an ~8-point jump in AVG. The results so far match the preseason expectations and in a month or so, it will be time for another check-in.


Big Kid Adds (Week 4)

While the NFBC Main Event garners most of the attention, there are a handful of leagues with even a larger entry fee ($2.5K to $15K). They get originally named “High Stakes Leagues” and this year there are nine of them. With so much money on the line, these fantasy managers are going to try to gain any advantage. Most of the time, these managers will be a week or two ahead of everyone else on their adds. Here are the players and some information on the ones added in four or more of these leagues. Read the rest of this entry »