Statcast Batted Ball Stats For Aging Stars

In baseball, the best players rise to the top through consistency of talent. As a result, it is only natural for players, managers, and fans alike to assume a player will produce at roughly career averages year after year. Obviously this cannot last forever, and father time will eventually have his final say. Today, I’m looking at three players on the back end of their careers; Jose Bautista, Edwin Encarnacion, and Adrian Beltre. I’m going to look at their combinations of exit velocity and launch angles and see if there are any clear warning signs for these players going into spring training.

Jose Bautista

Bautista is going into his age 36 season with a ADP that is currently hovering around 100. Last year he suffered multiple leg injuries, two of which required DL stints. The first a turf toe incident, the second a sprained knee. Between the two, he spent 53 days on the disabled list. However, when active, Bautista had an uptick in batted ball quality from 2015, perhaps linked to his 2015 shoulder injury. On his recorded balls in play, and keep in mind statcast misses out on some of the weakest contact, he upgraded 5% of his BIP from ground balls to line drives/fly balls between 5 and 36 degrees of vertical launch angle. Even better, a lot of the balls hit on these angles were over 100 mph.

Jose Bautista
Launch Angle Exit Velocity 2016 2015 Δ lgwOBA
> 36° 70-90 10.3% 10.4% -0.1% 0.035
> 36° 90-100 9.6% 5.4% 4.2% 0.092
-10 to 5° 70-90 4.9% 3.7% 1.2% 0.098
-10 to 5° 90-100 2.5% 4.0% -1.6% 0.174
21 to 36° 70-90 4.7% 3.0% 1.6% 0.212
5 to 21° 70-90 4.9% 4.7% 0.2% 0.219
-10 to 5° 100-120 11.3% 12.8% -1.5% 0.239
5 to 21° 90-100 5.1% 5.7% -0.6% 0.361
5 to 21° 100-120 11.8% 14.8% -3.1% 0.434
21 to 36° 90-100 7.4% 7.1% 0.3% 0.498
< -10° 90-100 4.2% 5.1% -0.9% 0.551
< -10° 70-90 5.6% 6.4% -0.8% 0.595
> 36° 100-120 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.636
< -10° 100-120 3.4% 2.7% 0.7% 0.809
21 to 36° 100-120 7.8% 5.1% 2.8% 1.521

I’ve marked the largest swings in performance between his two seasons, but you should note that his balls tended away from the middle value hits and towards the extremes. He hit significantly more of the hardest hit fly balls, but also significantly more lazy pop ups. Both at the expense of hard hit line drives. That said, these numbers represent a more general overview of the contact he produced. There are other stats, such as Value Hits (they have a .879/.874/2.606 slashline), which suggest Bautista faced some regression on the upper tier of his batted balls. He dropped from 8.7% to 7.1% Value Hits per plate appearance. This manifested as a pretty significant drop in home runs compared to prior seasons. While Steamer suggests his power will likely rebound, and it probably will, his power may in fact be declining faster than some expect. I think you’ll be more likely to see 23-24 home runs out of him than 30.

Edwin Encarnacion

Encarnacion is entering his age 34 season, the first of a three year pact with Cleveland. Last year he matched his career high 42 home runs and set career highs in Runs Scored and RBIs, all on the back of a career high 702 plate appearances. You could call it a career year for him, although you could make arguments for his 2012 and 2015 seasons. All of this success has pushed his ADP up to around 25, and many are projecting him to hit 35 home runs and 100+ RBI for the third year in a row, 6th year in a row if you throw him a bone and round up the 34 HR and 98 RBI in 2014.

In 2016, Encarnacion lifted the ball much more than he did in 2015. I know his listed FB% dropped, but discarding the popups and exceptionally weakly hit balls, which statcast has trouble measuring, his flyball rate increased a bit. I’ve separated batted balls into five categories, which you can see in the table below. First, the very poor ground balls (angle below -10°), slightly better ground balls (-10 and 5°), line drives (5-21°), ideal flyballs (21-36°) and weak flyballs (higher than 36°). In essence, there are two types of ground balls (high angle and low angle), and two types of flyballs (again, high and low). Encarnacion hit more both types of fly balls and fewer of both types of ground balls. He also hit more line drives.

Edwin Encarnacion
Launch Angle 2015 2016 Δ
< -10° 16.7% 16.1% -0.7%
-10 to 5° 28.6% 26.9% -1.7%
5 to 21° 21.8% 22.3% +0.5%
21 to 36° 16.9% 18.1% +1.1%
> 36° 15.9% 16.7% +0.8%

Granted, launch angle doesn’t tell the whole story-although it appears to hold year to year better than most other stats- exit velocity matters, too. So, like with his buddy Bautista, I’ve broken this down even further with some exit velocity included. First, you may notice that balls hit above 36° occupy the two lowest value categories in this chart. Second, you’ll notice he didn’t increase either of these low value categories, but instead the high end, high velocity group, which happens to be the fifth most valuable group listed.

Edwin Encarnacion
Launch Angle Exit Velocity 2016 2015 Δ lgwOBA lgDist
> 36° 70-90 7.9% 8.3% -0.5% .030 235.2
> 36° 90-100 6.2% 8.6% -2.4% .072 299.1
< -10° 70-90 7.6% 8.6% -1.0% .076 88.3
< -10° 90-100 4.0% 4.8% -0.7% .157 109.0
All < 70 9.8% 2.1% 7.6% .179 42.8
-10 to 5° 70-90 6.2% 6.0% 0.2% .197 124.2
21 to 36° 70-90 4.8% 5.2% -0.5% .198 288.4
< -10° 100-120 2.6% 1.7% 1.0% .225 121.7
-10 to 5° 90-100 4.8% 7.1% -2.4% .353 140.0
-10 to 5° 100-120 7.9% 5.2% 2.6% .431 160.4
21 to 36° 90-100 5.7% 6.0% -0.2% .478 353.1
> 36° 100-120 3.1% 1.7% 1.4% .588 351.2
5 to 21° 70-90 4.0% 7.1% -3.1% .598 208.1
5 to 21° 90-100 5.2% 7.1% -1.9% .624 261.0
5 to 21° 100-120 13.1% 10.7% 2.4% .813 289.9
21 to 36° 100-120 7.1% 9.8% -2.6% 1.593 398.2

I’ve marked the categories with the biggest gains and losses. Worryingly his losses are not exactly where you want to see them. His low/mid exit velocity line drives and highest exit velocity ideally hit balls have dipped substantially. Worse still, the category with the greatest increase, by far, happens to be the under 70 mph group. These consist of pop ups and lazy ground balls. The average distance on these batted balls is only 48 feet.  That’s practically a bunt.

For reference, I’ve included the average batted ball distances for all of these groups. If you go through line by line, you can see, generally speaking, the categories he increased in 2016 tend to have lower average batted ball distance than the categories that decreased.

This increasing numbers of exceptionally weak contact is worrying, especially as Encarnacion leaves the home run friendly AL East to enter the not quite so friendly AL Central. If he can maintain the high exit velocities on his upper tier batted ball, he should keep his power numbers. Any dip in exit velocity without a corresponding drop in the number of these exceptionally weak pop ups could shred both his home run rate and batting average. Some of the differences here might be statistical noise, I can’t rule that out. I have noticed that angle tends to hold steady year to year for most players, though. I’m worried that his bat may be slowing down a bit. Take a look at his contact heatmap between 2015 and 2016 (and note that 2014, 2013, etc are all pretty similar to 2015).

There are pronounced dips both high and inside, and you can see similar drops in slugging in these locations as well. Encarnacion may be due for some age based regression, I’d be wary.

Adrian Beltre

Boy, how does Beltre do this year after year? He’s entering his age 38 season, and he’s still one of the top position players. He’s currently sitting with an ADP in the low 70s, and probably the 7th best third basemen going into 2017. However, his batted ball profile has a few things in common with Encarnacion. For starters, he hit significantly more flyballs above 36° and much fewer balls below -10°. He also hit fewer line drives between 5 and 21°. These are all of the same traits I covered with Encarnacion. But, and this is a big but, Beltre managed to increase the number of high velocity balls on ideal launch angles, even with a dipping rate of ideal launch angles. Take a look at this table.

Adrian Beltre
Launch Angle Exit Velocity 2016 2015 Δ lgwOBA lgDist
> 36° 70-90 9.5% 9.1% 0.4% .030 235.2
> 36° 90-100 6.7% 4.8% 1.9% .072 299.1
< -10° 70-90 5.8% 8.1% -2.2% .076 88.3
< -10° 90-100 5.4% 2.9% 2.5% .157 109
All < 70 8.0% 8.7% -0.7% .179 42.8
-10 to 5° 70-90 5.4% 5.8% -0.4% .197 124.2
21 to 36° 70-90 4.3% 5.8% -1.5% .198 288.4
< -10° 100-120 1.5% 0.4% 1.1% .225 121.7
-10 to 5° 90-100 7.8% 8.3% -0.5% .353 140
-10 to 5° 100-120 6.3% 7.0% -0.8% .431 160.4
21 to 36° 90-100 8.7% 9.3% -0.7% .478 353.1
> 36° 100-120 0.4% 0.6% -0.2% .588 351.2
5 to 21° 70-90 5.4% 5.4% 0.0% .598 208.1
5 to 21° 90-100 8.9% 11.8% -2.9% .624 261
5 to 21° 100-120 9.5% 8.1% 1.4% .813 289.9
21 to 36° 100-120 6.3% 3.9% 2.3% 1.593 398.2

Beltre hit more ground balls and fewer line drives, but he also hit more balls at the highest exit velocities. He increased the exit velocity on his ground balls (from 88 to 89 mph), and line drives (93 to 95 mph).

Where Encarnacion saw a general increase in launch angle, with exit velocity largely staying constant, Beltre instead saw a redistribution of his weak contact and an increase in frequency for the strongest contact. Encarnacion is flirting with danger, while Beltre seems to be improving. Somehow. I don’t know how. I guess that’s what makes him a Hall of Famer. Granted, age has a way of sneaking up on you, but with Beltre I don’t see obvious signs of weakening ability by looking at these batted ball stats.





Andrew Perpetua is the creator of CitiFieldHR.com and xStats.org, and plays around with Statcast data for fun. Follow him on Twitter @AndrewPerpetua.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sgnthlr85
7 years ago

I enjoyed this, but do wish Nelson Cruz would’ve been included in this article.
Maybe a follow up on some youngsters who made big improvements last year in their launch angles and exit velocity?