Vazquez Lands With The Marlins

The Marlins, like the Dodgers, wasted no time filling out their pitching staff this offseason. They agreed to a one-year deal worth $7MM with Javier Vazquez yesterday, trading a full no-trade clause for a discount on the sticker price. Javy moves to a friendlier run environment and gets a crack at rebuilding his value before going back out onto the market next season, but more importantly for him, he’s nice and close to his family in Puerto Rico. A physical is all that stands in the way of the deal being a physical, but it’s not a given.

After a decade of 200+ IP seasons, the question right now is Vazquez’s health. He threw just 157.1 innings in 2010, his lowest total since 1999, mostly because he stunk rather than outright injury. Javy’s velocity was down at the start of the year, from 90-91 to about 88-89, and it progressively got worse as the season went on.

There were times in August and September that he’d come out of gate firing 83-84 mph fastballs in the first inning, but it would usually creep up to 88 or so after an inning or two of work. Just from watching the games though, and this is completely subjective, it was rather easy to see that his breaking pitches were lacking too. His curveball and slider were cement-mixers more than anything, just spinning without much action. Vazquez’s changeup was fine, but with his fastball compromised he didn’t have anything to change speeds off of. It became a batting practice fastball. It’s not ridiculous to think that the righty could have been hiding an injury, especially at age 34 and with all those miles on his arm.

But let’s assume for a second that he’s healthy and physically capable of 200 innings and throwing the ball hard enough to break a window in 2011. A straight 5-3-2 weighting system pegs Vazquez for a 4.35 FIP (8.1 K/9, 2.9 BB/9, 1.4 HR/9) next season, a far cry from the ≤3.86 FIP he posted every year from 2006 through 2009. He’s always been homer prone as an extreme fly ball guy (just 39% grounders in the FanGraphs era), so his new stadium should help a bit in that department. If he gets his innings in and regains some stuff, the wins will surely be there.

Vazquez had been a quality fantasy starter for years until his 2010 meltdown, though it’s reasonable to expect a rebound next year after the AL-NL switch, the ballpark switch, and an offseason of rest. There’s enough quality starters out there that you don’t have to count on him to be one of your top three, but as a roll of the dice later in the draft, a double-digit round, there’s some big upside potential here, as Hubie Brown would say.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Mike writes about the Yankees at River Ave. Blues and baseball in general at CBS Sports.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William
15 years ago

I wouldn’t bank on a strong rebound, and for fundamental reasons. Your eyes didn’t fail you: pitch fx shows that his slider didn’t move nearly as much … and what’s worse, that’s been a trend for a number of years now. Same goes for his fastball, and for both pitches’ velocity. Considering that he never had a crazy arsenal to begin with (excepting a very anomalous ’09, no recent year has a single pitch as having delivered a double digit run-value).

And you are right about his FB’s velocity on the effectiveness of his changeup, so what does that leave to remain hopeful about (especially because he has never lived up to the rosier picture FIP and the like paint for him)?

Toss in a career low BABIP accompanying his poor ’10, meaning no expectation that better luck will bail him out, and I for one am not risking a dime on him…