The Best Fantasy Starters of the Past Calendar Year

Last week I took a look at the best fantasy hitters over the past calendar year by running the results of that split through Zach Sanders’ z-score method for calculating fantasy value. The motivation for that post was to make an argument that when voting for All-Stars the second half of the previous season should be considered. I understand that the “Past 1 Calendar Years” split on the leaderboards includes stats that were pre-All-Star break 2013, but…close enough. And I also realize fantasy value doesn’t necessarily equal All-Star, but, again, close enough. I quickly want to highlight the starting pitchers I’d vote into the All-Star game (ten per league) based on their performance over the last 365 in the image below. After that I want to discuss a few guys whose ownership percentage is out of whack with their performance in the past calendar year.

All-Star SP

If you’d like to get a look at the complete rankings of fantasy value for qualified starters over the last 365 days, check out this Google Sheet. Below is a guy who should be owned in more leagues based on performance in the past calendar year and two guys that are owned in way too many leagues.

Jose Quintana, 4.4% owned on ESPN.com

I could spend some time breaking Quintana down, but all I really need to do is convince you that he’s criminally underowned. To do that, I’d like to show you how his stats over the past calendar year compare to the league average so far in 2014.

quintana

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Better run prevention, fewer base runners and more strikeouts than the league average. There is absolutely no reason that 129 starting pitchers should be owned in more leagues than Quintana. As even more reason to pick him up, he looks to be in line for a little positive regression. He has the fourth lowest strand rate among 94 qualified starters despite allowing home runs at a rate almost half of the league average. His BABIP is also a bit outside the normal range and quite a bit higher than what it has been in his first couple of years in the league. As the 43rd best fantasy starter over the past calendar year, Quintana is probably just above the cut line for pitchers who are more than spot starters in 12-team mixed leagues. But his ownership percentage makes it seems like he’s a risky spot starter. Pick him up.

Shelby Miller, 99.3% owned

Justin Verlander, 99.8% owned

It hasn’t been two weeks since I advised Rotographs readers to believe in the projection systems and not give up on Verlander. But that was in the context of daily fantasy baseball where I do believe Verlander could have value in the second half of the season. But in season long leagues, there’s no reason he must be owned. No more than 50 pitchers are run-them-out-there-every-time starters in 12 team mixed leagues. After 45-50 guys, everyone is just a spot starter. And Verlander ranks as only the 57th best fantasy starter of the past calendar year. Miller ranks 53rd. Both would rank much lower if I compiled rankings that only took 2014 stats into consideration.

If you’re going to hold on to one of them, it should be Verlander. He has more upside just because of the elite level he was once at, and the projections do believe he’ll improve the rest of the way. As for Miller, it looks like he’s keeping it together on the surface with his 3.56 ERA. But his strikeout and walk rates have swung wildly in a negative direction and are both well below league average this year. His SIERA is an ugly 4.72. Drop him and let someone else feel the effects of the regression monster.





You can find more of Brett's work on TheFantasyFix.com or follow him on Twitter @TheRealTAL.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Emcee Peepants
11 years ago

I know you prefer Verlander in seasonal leagues, but I still think Miller, at 23 with 280 IP, has a better chance of turning things around than Verlander, at 31 with 1876 IP. Also, Miller has had some stretches where he’s looked like he’s all his shit in one sock, where Verlander has been pretty consistently terrible since mid-May.

Krono
11 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

Miller has been terrible. Not a good plan to keep him.