Stephen Strasburg: Not Quite Elite

Last season, Stephen Strasburg was selected for an average price of $28 and was taken 13th overall in Yahoo! snake drafts. An 8-9 record over 183 innings prevented him from living up to his pre-draft hype. Despite a 3.00 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, and 191 strikeouts, Strasburg delivered just $14 of value to his owners. Strasburg is entering his age 25 season with concerns about his durability, so the question on everyone’s mind is “should I target him in my draft?”

Strasburg dealt with forearm soreness near the end of the season, which can indicate an elbow injury. As of December 5th, his rehab was said to be progressing steadily although he may be a few days behind the curve in spring training. Most fantasy owners will get an opportunity to verify his health next spring, which could affect his auction price substantially.

He also missed time last season with an oblique injury. Such injuries can recur and may indicate an imbalance in the core. However, he seems to have fully recovered, so it shouldn’t be a cause for concern unless he shows symptoms of another core related injury. Any minor injury that causes him to alter his mechanics could also put pressure on his oblique.

Aside from the injury risk, Strasburg is a model front line fantasy starter. His strikeout rate declined from ridiculous (11.13 K/9 in 2012) to very good (9.39 K/9 in 2013), while he maintained a strong walk rate of 2.75 BB/9. His ground ball rate increased over seven percent to 51.5% and a low line drive rate allowed him to limit hitters to a .263 BABIP. That latter figure may have been a fluke and it’s unclear whether we should expect Strasburg to continue burning worms and limiting line drives.

Strasburg still relies on a fastball, change-up, and curve ball. Last season, his fastball was good, his curve ball was great, but his change-up was downright fascist. Let’s turn to the tables.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Strasburg RA
Strasburg Saber

The first chart shows his results and averages while the second chart contains information on pitch outcomes. Batters managed a paltry .128 batting average against Strasburg’s change-up without ANY extra base hits. The pitch is a strikeout weapon and hitters who bothered to swing at the pitch whiffed 47 percent of the time. His curve ball was similarly effective, although he did allow five extra base hits with the pitch. Given the effectiveness of his secondary weapons, it’s possible that he will continue to generate low BABIP’s.

If there’s any complaint about Strasburg’s repertoire, it’s that he’s somewhat predictable. He leans on his fastball with the first pitch or when he’s behind in the count, which is typical of any pitcher. He’ll then mix in his curve ball and change-up once he’s ahead in the count. Unsurprisingly, left-handers see more change-ups while right-handers are more frequently attacked with the curve ball. Given the superlative nature of his pitches, a straight-forward approach is probably fine. He also mixes things just enough that he’s never too predictable.

Which brings us to the issue of how to price him. Strasburg is a Mercedes brand pitcher, so he’s not going to go cheaply in any league. There will always be someone willing to shell out big bucks to roster him. A year from now, I expect to be writing that Strasburg was worth about $15 (more wins and mild rate stat regression), but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be willing to pay more in the draft. He has the talent to win 20 games while posting excellent rate stats, which would be worth about $30. That upside has value.

The first question to ask yourself is “Am I willing to bet that he’ll make 30 or more starts?” If the answer is no, then exclude him from your plans. Hint: it’s perfectly acceptable to bet against Strasburg reaching 30 starts.

If you’re willing to gamble on 30 starts, then you have to decide what you expect of his strikeout, walk, and ground ball rates. Will he continue to produce a low BABIP like last season or will it be around league average like in 2012? If you find yourself projecting similar rates to last season, then it might be worth bidding around $25 for Strasburg. You’re unlikely to win him for less.

Personally, I expect to be on price enforcement duty and no more. There are too many risks to justify a mid-$20’s bid unless I have some extra cash lying around. With most players, you can hold out hope that he’ll fall through the cracks and sell at a reasonable price, but we can probably rule that out with Strasburg. 





You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Hunter Pence's Thorax
12 years ago

Stephen Strasburg isn’t elite because he doesn’t win games.

But he has the talent to win 20 games.

His injury history also keep him from being elite.

So when he’s not on the DL…and the Nats score runs…Stephen Strasburg is an elite pitcher?

Cory
12 years ago

His lack of wins seem like a spotty BP and suspect offense.

john
12 years ago

That’s not Strasburg’s problem, it’s ours. We set up the valuation system to reward Wins (or endorse it by using it is most every format). If we used QS or a bonus for innings, that would enhance his value.

From a close observer’s perspective, having watched almost every Strasburg start over the last two seasons, he is not quite elite; he will have an inning or so where a couple of guys guess right or he leaves something out over the plate, and thus struggles to hang PQS 4 and 5 starts. And he does get blown out of games about once a month or so.

At 25 he could well develop into the kind of dependable guy represented by Halladay or Wainwright. One nice thing is that he is not counted on as the stopper: his stuff is #1, but you could find a way to rank him #3 or #4 in the Nats’ rotation, with the arrival of Fister. Not a bad problem to have. I agree with the article.

cass
12 years ago
Reply to  Brad Johnson

Are there any other pitchers you consider elite?

Will
12 years ago

Agreed, though I would add about those occasional blowups and what I think needs to happen there: when a bad error that should have ended an inning happens, or when it is really hot, or things like that, Stras has imploded. This has to be psychological in part, and to be elite, you need to be able to block those things out, and he is still (hopefully) developing in that way. I haven’t watched Kershaw enough to know, but I’m guessing that with the Dodger’s outfield, there have been times when they gave the opposing team a fourth out in an inning, but that he then just went after the next guy. I’ve been at the park a number of times when the same thing happened with Strasburg and seen him just lose it. I know that isn’t sabermetricky, but I really do think if he can learn the skill of a very short-term memory that he’ll have a great chance to be one of the greats.

(BTW, Brad, getting over 6 points/IP is pretty elite for our league!)

cass
12 years ago
Reply to  Will

That was just an isolated incident or two early in 2013. He never had this ‘problem’ before 2013 and didn’t experience it later in the year. The local writers made it out to be a Big Thing and he was declared redeemed when he told Zimmerman “I got you” the next time he made an error and proceeded to pitch well. It all seemed like SSS to me.

This is how I saw it, anyway. My bigger worry would be the decreased strikeout %, but that seemed to be due to trading K’s for GB’s.

David Cameron
12 years ago

Is still rather have Ackley.

Jose
12 years ago

My impression of Strasburg is that he often doesn’t pitch deep enough into games. That’s really the only control a pitcher can have over his win total.

Strasburg averaged 6.1 innings per start last year. Just to pull two young and talented names for comparison, Bumgarner averaged 6.49 and Harvey averaged 6.86. I’m not sure how he compares with other pitchers drafted in the top 20 SP, but I’m guessing he’s on the low end of the scale.

The Nationals are probably babying him still because of his injury risk.

Derrick
12 years ago
Reply to  Jose

If you remove the games he was pulled from due to rain delays, ejections, etc. he averaged exactly 7 innings per start.

dl80
12 years ago
Reply to  Derrick

I’m not sure how you get that number.

I found two games that I would say an early exit shouldn’t be counted against him: August 17 (ejected after 1 inning) and August 28 (removed after 2 innings because of rain delay).

May 31, he left after 2 innings because of an injury, so he doesn’t get that one wiped out in my opinion.

He went at least 5 innings or 80+ pitches in every other start. I didn’t check every one of them, but even if one or two of those others were shortened due to rain, it wouldn’t change his overall IP/start much.

Excluding the two that I noted, he comes in at 180 innings dived by 28 starts = 6.43 IP/start.

He only went more than 7 innings 5 times, so it’s almost impossible for him to have averaged 7 innings like you stated.

Plus, Bumgarner was ejected from one game as well, and that brings his average innings per start up to 6.57, so it’s not like Strasburg even catches him.

Strasburg only averaged 95 pitches per game (including the two shortened ones) so it does look like the Nationals were being exceedingly cautious still. I wouldn’t hold the low innings against him, but there is no way he averaged 7 innings.

dl80
12 years ago

Wait…the scale of superlatives goes “good…great…fascist”? Yikes!

cass
12 years ago
Reply to  dl80

“Fascist” applies only to strikeouts. Perhaps you know this, but it’s a reference to the movie Bull Durham.

dl80
12 years ago
Reply to  cass

Ah, I have not seen that movie in forever, so I didn’t get the reference. I guess I’ll have to rewatch it!.

My comment was in jest, anyway. I wasn’t actually offended!

cass
12 years ago
Reply to  cass

Crash Davis: Relax, all right? Don’t try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they’re fascist. Throw some ground balls – it’s more democratic.