Rick Porcello Deserves Another Look
Anyone remember who the unexpected darling of spring training was this year? Okay, fine, it was Yasiel Puig. But if we stick to either Florida or the mound, then the man collecting the most acclaim in March was Detroit pitcher Rick Porcello, who struck out 21 in 24 innings without allowing a single walk. Now, you know as well as I do that spring training numbers don’t really matter, yet it’s hard to ignore a 21/0 K/BB.
|
K/9
|
BB/9
|
FIP
|
xFIP
|
|
|
2010
|
4.65
|
2.10
|
4.31
|
4.24
|
|
2011
|
5.14
|
2.27
|
4.06
|
4.02
|
|
2012
|
5.46
|
2.25
|
3.89
|
3.89
|
|
2013
|
6.73
|
1.92
|
3.51
|
3.24
|
That kind of buzz made Porcello something of an early darling among fantasy players, especially as he entered his age-24 season with a solid (if small) four year trend of declining home run rates and increasing K/9 rates behind him. Porcello had lowered his FIP and his xFIP each year of his career, and so far in 2013 he’s continued that trend (see table at right). By all indications, Porcello has continued improving as a pitcher, and he’s right ahead of James Shields, Gio Gonzalez, and Cole Hamels on the FIP charts.
Yet here we are in the first week of August, and Porcello has only a 4.49 ERA. He’s still owned in fewer than 20% of ESPN and Yahoo! leagues. What gives?
Let’s tackle the ERA-FIP differential first, since the 0.97 gap there is the fourth-largest in the big leagues, and there’s a few obvious answers to that. The clearest cause there is a disaster start Porcello had on April 20 in Anaheim, allowing nine earned runs while managing to collect only two outs. That outing alone inflated his ERA hugely, since without it we’re looking at a 3.80 ERA, much closer to the his 3.51 FIP. While we can’t pretend he didn’t have that terrible start, it also doesn’t seem that indicative of the pitcher he is right now, and it’s not difficult to think that the ugly 4.49 ERA is scaring owners away.
What’s also interesting on that ERA-FIP leaderboard is that Porcello isn’t the only Tiger on it. Doug Fister, Justin Verlander, and Max Scherzer all join Porcello on the Top 26, and as a team, the Tigers have the biggest ERA-FIP gap in the game. That’s not much of a surprise, since the infield defense is porous at the corners with Prince Fielder & Miguel Cabrera, who simply don’t turn balls into outs like other cornermen do. That won’t change, but Porcello — and all Tiger pitching — could get a boost in that department with the addition of spectacular defender Jose Iglesias, who is expected to be the new regular shortstop assuming that Jhonny Peralta is about to get suspended in the next few days for his involvement in the Biogenesis scandal. Considering that Porcello is second only to Justin Masterson in percentage of ground balls generated, that can only help his run prevention stats.
So noting that one atrocious game and the likelihood of improved infield defense should help the perception of Porcello (though only so much, because even given Iglesias’ reputation for excellent defense, Peralta is at worst the second-best defender in the Detroit infield, depending on how you feel about Omar Infante). But he’s also put specific effort into improving against opposite-handed hitters, as he told our own Eno Sarris last month:
The Tiger starter told me that he “really dedicated” himself to working on his curve this offseason, mostly because the cutter/slider “wasn’t really working.” Since it moves left to right, it cuts right into the meat of the plate for lefties. “The curveball is a more effective pitch to left-handers, which is something I struggle with,” Porcello admitted to me before his team played the White Sox in Chicago this week. Over his career, the pitcher has allowed lefties lower strikeout and grounder rates and higher walk rates than he has allowed to righties.
So this past winter, Porcello went to work: “The first thing I did this offseason was to really fine-tune my mechanics to where I was getting to a consistent release point, keeping everything the same, and from there, basically throwing my curveball out of the same arm slot as my fastball and changeup and just getting consistent with it.” A lot of throwing sessions later, he was a three-pitch pitcher coming into the season.
This year, he’s more than tripled his usage of the curve against lefties. It’s now his primary pitch when ahead against lefties. And he has the highest swinging strike, strikeout and ground-ball rates of his career. His FIP against lefties — career 4.47 — dropped to 3.81. For the first time in his career, he’s above-average against lefties.
Porcello’s continued improving his swing-and-miss stuff, while limiting homers and minimizing platoon splits, and now he may have the benefit of an upgrade at the most important defensive position. He’s not a star, because no fantasy pitcher with a K/9 that can’t crack seven is going to be, but he’s better than you think he is — and it doesn’t require an incredibly deep AL-only league to make him worth a shot.
Mike Petriello used to write here, and now he does not. Find him at @mike_petriello or MLB.com.
I think that in the last paragraph you meant K/9, but nevertheless, interesting piece on an interesting pitcher.
I did, thanks.
Not sure about Porcello’s fantasy value.
However, I would love to see how much, if at all, he improves with Iglesias.
Consider the following:
1. Based on my research, about 22% of balls in play involve the SS. In the case of Porcello, this is likely higher (ground ball pitcher with a K/9 under 7). Do you happen to have league average number?
2. Peralta range was poor, but his 2012 defensive fWAR component was excellent, mainly because he was close to perfect on balls he could get to. How much better is having a bigger range v. being sure handed on balls with a limited range?
3. Will batters change their approach with Iglesias? I have to think that RH hitters pulled the ball more against the Tigers than other teams, know is the a “seeing eye” grounder was probable with Peralta and Cabrera on the left side. Perhaps they have to think more about going opposite field? Just having Iglesias on the field may change the spray charts of opponents which may help Porcello and others (obviously there is a shorter throw on the right side than left, and a higher probability of an out).
Considering the sample size of games we’ll have for Porcello rest of season, call it 10-12 starts, do we really think a single new defender will have that much of an impact?
Defenders already produce a very high percentage of positive outcomes. The difference between an average defender and a great one is very small, but over the course of a long season it adds up.
But when we’re talking about 10 starts is there really going to be a tangible difference between Peralta and Iglesias?
I do think it will help, but we are still assuming Peralta gets suspended, which is not official. He may yet appeal and stick around.
I do agree with you that this one change can’t make *that* much of a difference on its own, but I do think it will help, and my goal here was not only to point out that he could get improved D behind him, but that his high ERA doesn’t seem indicative of the pitcher he is. (Not just for ERA-FIP reasons either, also because of that one disaster outing.)
“Will batters change their approach with Iglesias?”
I can’t believe this to be true, batters change their approach to pitchers not specific defenders. That’s why infield shifts have become so effective- if it was easy for a hitter to change his approach in regards to defense they would certainly do so and the shifts would stop
Porcello consistently has a large ERA-FIP gap. He seems to be one of those guys who struggles to pitch with men on base, leading to lower strand rates than would be expected. A la Ricky Nolasco of years past.
This is completely unscientific, but I think Porcello is an absolute bum and every time he strings together a handful of nice starts, I pick him up and he proceeds to throw an absolute clunker in my face in his next start out. I will never, ever, ever, ever, ever trust him again. Stupid turkey foot. Sigh … that felt good to get that off my chest!
“Did he get the win? That’s all that matters”
– Harold Reynolds
I’m just not sold on Porcello. Just isolating the last 30 days, the raw stats look good. 2.08 ERA and a 1.15 WHIP. But then you look at the Ks, only 16 in 26 IP, or 5.5 Ks/9. Then you look at the BBs, 7 in that 26 IP. So he’s barely over 2 Ks for every BB he’s issued. These are pretty pedestrian numbers.
Porcello’s career ERA is about .40 worse than his FIP. His career LOB% is 69.1%. Career BABIP is .312. This is over 804 innings of work, so it is hardly a small sample size.
Could Porcello simply be one of those pitchers that underperforms his peripherals?
In every year of Porcello’s career, the majority of the Tigers’ rotation has had an E-F > 0. As such, there’s a case to be made that Porcello may pitch to, or exceed, his peripherals if he had a better defense behind him.
In that case, should we assume that given Cabrera + Fielder means they still have a poor defense, that this will continue?
Not a fan of the guy, especially in QS leagues which is all I seem to be in. He’s just not consistent enough and I can pick up solid RP that will give me similar K, ERA and WHIP production.
What non-closer has similar K, ERA and WHIP production? Not trying to be a douche, just trying to find that player and improve my team.
Trevor Rosenthal comes to mind although he’s probably scooped up by now. Others that give similar production are, Smyly, Delabar (although he’s hurt now), Furbush, David Carpenter, AJ Ramos just to name a few.
I avoid Porcello like the plague. He is the most overhyped bad pitcher in baseball. He will be lucky to have Zito’s career. 4+ years of data is enough to be scientific in my eyes, he is not good.
You may be right, but ignore the facts that (a) those 4+ years were his age 20-24 seasons and (b) that, as the chart shows, he’s improved in every year at your own risk.
Everyone reading this article thinking “I can’t buy low on this guy” read these comments and know “yes you can”
Porcello’s projected remaining schedule:
Aug
4 ChW
9 @NYY
14 @ChW
20 Minn
25 @NYM
30 Clev
Sept
4 @Bsn
10 @ChW
16 Sea
21 ChW
27 @Mia
I have trouble trusting Porcello, but that yummo schedule….
If he’s a good pitcher, why doesn’t he pitch good…