Ranking Sale, Bard, and Feliz: A Declaration

When, in the course of formulating the starting pitcher consensus ranks for the 2012 fantasy baseball season, it becomes necessary to rank a relief pitcher as as starting pitcher before he makes start number one in the new season, a decent respect to the opinions of RotoGraphs readership requires that a little more attention be paid to the causes that led to the exclusion of said starter-slash-relief pitchers from the rankings — and how they’d be ranked otherwise.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all pitchers are mostly divided into two groups; that they are thus endowed by the game with different kinds of value and to be judged separately; that inherent to each value is the pursuit of saves or wins but not usually both; that it is much more difficult to gain starting pitcher eligibility and actually start than it is to be a starter-eligible reliever; that the penalties associated from moving from the bullpen to the rotation (17% degradation in strikeout walk and home run rate, as well as a .7-2 mph drop in fastball velocity, on average) often make newly-minted relievers-turned-starters a shaky proposition; that therefore most years it makes most sense to rank reliever-eligible pitchers with the relievers.

But whenever any form or ranking encounters a destructive force — as it has this year in the form of Men like Daniel Bard, Neftali Feliz, and Chris Sale — it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish the old ways and to institute a new form of rankings.

So we’ll do that, sometime.

For right now, though, we’ll have to just tell you where we ranked the guys so you can make an informed decision.

Eno Sarris Mike Podhorzer Zach Sanders Jeff Zimmerman Consensus
Matt Moore 30 20 40 32 28
Chris Sale 51 43 66 26 47
Daniel Bard 57 48 84 36 56
Neftali Feliz 59 66 56 66 62
Aaron Crow 131 86 103 112 108

It’s no surprise that Matt Moore is the favorite — our consensus has him ranked ranked at 28 — but Sale’s ranking might turn some heads. Obviously, Zach liked the lefty less than the rest of us at least. There bullet points on both sides of his ledger. He was a starter more recently than Bard and Feliz. He had the most excellent numbers last year. He can take a 17% hit and still be great. He has a starter’s repertoire, with three plus pitches. On the other hand, he has a funky delivery that some think will hurt his longevity and durability. His release point makes him more prone to platoon splits than a fastball/slider/change lefty might normally be. He’s only faced 55% right-handers so far in his career and starters usually face about 80% righties. Which way does the scale tilt for you?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Bard sang a beautiful tune last year. Not only did he manage a strikeout per inning — built on the back of an elite swinging strike rate — but he also coaxed more than half his contact on the ground and showed above-average control. The two questions with his move to the rotation surround his velocity and third pitch. How much of his 97 MPH gas will he retain after the switch? And how will that reduced velocity affect his 90+ MPH changeup, in turn? Can that change be a third pitch for him or will his current platoon splits (4.09 FIP v LHB, 2.34 FIP v RHB) only be exacerbated when he has to face batters repeatedly?

Feliz gets the least love from the consensus, and maybe rightly so. He’s been the most injured, for one. And he’s already tried this move before and it didn’t take. On the other hand, we shouldn’t be giving too much weight to his 2011 numbers if we’re trying to project the coming season. It was only 62.1 innings, and despite his poor back-of-baseball-card numbers, he managed to keep his swinging strike rate and velocity at the same level it’s always been. Still, the fact that he’s used his fastball almost 80% of the time in his Major League career so far has to be a little disconcerting. The curveball can be devastating — can he succeed with two pitches? No matter how upbeat you are about Feliz and his chance to be a productive fantasy starter, you have to admit that the fact that they’ve tried this before and it didn’t take means that this brew has an aftertaste laden with doubt.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike D
13 years ago

You may need to do an edit – you mention “Moore” (assuming Matt Moore) without mentioning him previously.