My Personal Moneyball Moment
The following is the first in a series of probably two articles about my FanGraphs Staff League team on ottoneu. This was written during the season, prior to the start of the playoffs. Thus it contains no further reference to Nick Pollack’s heartrending defeat of me. That’s the topic of the next one.
Last winter, just before the ottoneu keeper deadline, our dark overlord (shh, don’t say his name) informed us that we would be switching to the new Head-to-Head format. I would say we didn’t have much time to adjust to the new settings, but, well, those settings were still very much in the design phase. At this point, my roster was set up as a back-end contender. With a little luck, I had a shot at first place. Maybe 15 percent? I wasn’t drawing dead, but I also wasn’t the odds on favorite.
The new format was a gift – manna from heaven – an unexpected opportunity to play a little Moneyball to get out ahead of the competition. And, after going 20-1 in the regular season, I’m comfortable saying I Moneyballed the crap out of my opponents.
Let’s back up a step, the league is FanGraphs Staff One which is among the longest running ottoneu leagues. We use FGpts scoring which is similar to the linear weights model used in WAR. I only joined at the last minute before the 2017 winter trade deadline. The roster I inherited was neither terrible nor particularly good. It needed work. It still needed work when we switched to the H2H format.
And another step back… I said I Moneyballed my opponents. The book is basically an ode to OBP. It’s about the art of leveraging mistakes in player valuation. In the case of Billy Beane’s Athletics, they noticed that other teams had somehow forgotten that the point of the game was to not make outs. Duh, right. I mean, kudos to Beane for focusing on OBP at a time when it wasn’t a leaguewide priority, but I think we can all agree that this is the baseball version of realizing that the circle block goes into the circular hole.
My innovation, and the reason why I crushed the regular season, was also obvious. I rostered a lot of starting pitchers. At times, the only bench players on my entire team were $2 Fernando Tatis and starting pitchers. And I used them to steamroll the competition.
Ottoneu H2H FGpts is just like a normal FGpts league except for two differences. You may start only one catcher per day. You may start only two starting pitchers per day. Experienced ottoneu players know that points per innings pitched is the lifeblood of the format. You generally can’t start Mike Leake because he doesn’t offer enough value per start. He’s basically unplayable unless you think you can predict when he’s hot (you can’t, you’re just guessing). We’re schooled to pay a lot for premium pitchers like Max Scherzer and Jacob deGrom. They put up over two more points per inning than Leake. Over a 200 inning season, that’s a 400 point upgrade. And those aces also take on more of your innings.
Several of my opponents focused on getting a few premium pitchers. Paul Swydan had been running an elite rotation for years. The format switch completely destroyed his roster. Because, you see, playing a few good pitchers per week doesn’t hold a candle to playing a lot of mediocre pitchers. Some math.
Remember, you can use two starts per day for a max of 14 per week. Let’s say Team A gets seven high quality starts (5.20 pts/IP). Team B runs 13 medium-low quality starts (3.9 pts/IP). Team A averages six innings per start. Team B averages 5.2 innings per start.
Team A: 7 * 6* 5.2 = 218.4 points
Team B: 13 * 5.2 * 3.9 = 263.64 points
I noticed this about 10 minutes before the draft began. Just in time! In order to ensure a near-maximums of starts per week, it’s necessary to roster 15 or more starting pitchers. Otherwise you get left with good weeks and bad weeks (indeed, my regular season loss happened during a rogue week with very few starts).
Already, the volume approach bears instant fruit. However, there’s another way in which I benefited from using low quality starting pitchers. I spent $1 to $3 on most of my pitchers. That allowed me invest a hefty portion of my budget into the offense, headlined by a $67 Mike Trout and $49 Paul Goldschmidt. Those premium batters (including some luck with cheap Ronald Acuna and Juan Soto) provided the extra ballast I needed for my 20-1 record. With just the pitchers and an average offense, my team would be slightly more competitive than the average roster. With volume pitching AND premium bats, it was a force with which to be reckoned.
The Point
Yea, there’s a lesson here, a buried lede if you will (or won’t). I’m not just preening for the audience. Any time you join a new league, pay close attention to the rules. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve beaten my fellow experts in weird formats just because they stayed anchored to more traditional valuations. Being able to anticipate the effects of unique settings can supply a couple years of easy wins – at least until your leaguemates start to emulate you. Then it’s time to find a new approach.
You can follow me on twitter @BaseballATeam
Nice to see a post about Ottoneu. Is it just me, or were there a lot more posts about Ottoneu last season?
We lost Joe Douglas to a team and I think he was doing a lot of the in-season content. I only do offseason content for ottoneu.
It’s really not. These always show up with no explanation of what it is, why it has such a weird name, or what the rules are.
I suppose I could write a “what is ottoneu” post to link to at the top of all ottoneu content. At this point we have something like 800 articles about ottoneu and it’s a FanGraphs product. So it seems silly to take 1/4 of a post explaining it.
I tried that same strategy and spent my money on Giancarlo Stanton and George Springer.
Yea, you still have to spike your other picks if you want to run the table. But it’s a much easier way to scrape wins than picking a small, talented pitching staff.
I play in a very old and strange 10×10 H2H dynasty league. It really favored compiling counting stats but everyone built teams like it was 5×5 roto: 5 or six SP, elite closers, bench filled with speculative offensive players. I made the playoffs my first year with a mediocre team and streaming 3 to 8 pitchers a week, sometimes adding 5 minutes before game time. Next year the commish made some very strict anti streaming measures: twice a week waivers, 5 moves a week, etc.
Know your rules, look for exploits!
I had a similar situation in a football league years ago. I was invited by a friend to his dad’s league, and one of the rules that nobody seemed aware of was that it was a PPR league, with a heavy weight towards receptions. As others in the league went heavy on workhorse running backs (Michael Turner was the 3rd overall pick!), I grabbed possession receivers and 3rd down backs like Wes Welker and Darren Sproles. My team ended up destroying other teams in the playoffs on the way to a pretty significant payday.
I too finished with a record like that in our H2H league. My fellow managers use to play over a site called Sandbox and we use their scoring system. It’s all about starting pitching (but not to the point where we need to change the scoring system). We get three moves a week.