Mock Battle: George Springer vs. Matt Kemp

I am participating in the ongoing mock draft, and Eno Sarris and Daniel Schwartz have already written about a pair of compelling draft choices they made. The pick I made that sparked the most interest was of George Springer, who I took in the fifth round with the 55th overall pick. Chris Cwik selected Matt Kemp with the next pick, which provides a compelling player for comparison.

But first, some background. I already had four players at the time of my Springer selection. They were Robinson Cano (1.7), Freddie Freeman (2.18), Max Scherzer (3.31), and Corey Dickerson (4.42). Four picks in is probably too soon to let your current roster dictate the choices you make with your subsequent picks, but I did enter the draft with a plan to draft high floor players early. Neither Cano nor Freeman maximized my potential counting stats with those selections, but neither player would hurt me if they replicated their down seasons from 2014. Meanwhile, toolsy, low average players like Springer are much easier to draft in the middle rounds when you’ve already rostered some plus-average players.

Also of interest, Springer and Kemp were the 19th and 20th outfielders selected in those first 56 total selections.

On to the player comparison. The easiest place to start is with their Steamer projections, and those paint a pretty clear picture of why I prefer Springer to Kemp:

G PA AVG HR R RBI SB
George Springer 138 610 .235 28 78 79 15
Matt Kemp 128 556 .266 20 64 70 8

Steamer gives Springer the edge in home runs, runs, RBI, stolen bases, and games played. The only roto category where Kemp has the higher projection is average. That 31-point advantage for Kemp is substantial, but with a foundation of Cano, Freeman, and Dickerson that I expect to be solid in terms of average, it is less of a priority for my roster. In absolute terms, Jeff Zimmerman estimates that three home runs or steals are worth about 10 points of average. Springer is projected to outproduce Kemp by 15 home runs plus steals, so Kemp would need a 50-point advantage in batting average to pull even.

For those less inclined to take Steamer at its word, the comparison becomes much closer. After all, Kemp played in 150 games in 2014 and hit 25 home runs, both substantially higher than his projection. In contrast, Springer stole just five bases in 78 games last season, which put him on pace for only two thirds of his projected total.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

I believe Steamer’s skepticism of Kemp and optimism for Springer are well-founded. For Kemp, the 2014 season was a return to form, but it came on the heels of two injury-shortened seasons that featured a variety of shoulder, hamstring, knee, and ankle injuries. Those injuries precipitated a decline in several aspects of Kemp’s game. After stealing at least 30 bases in three of four seasons from 2008 to 2011, he stole just eight bags despite a full season in 2014. Even if Kemp had not suffered so many leg injuries in recent seasons, he is now 30 years old, the age when many players see a decline in their stolen base totals.

The power decline is less obvious for Kemp if you treat his 39 home runs in 2011 as an anomaly. He hit 26 home runs in 2009, 28 in 2010, 23 in 2012, and 25 last season. That cursory glance suggests that Kemp returned to his previously established power level, but the underlying numbers suggest otherwise. In 2011, Kemp averaged 412.2 feet per home run according to ESPN’s Home Run Tracker, which was right in line with his 411.6-foot average from 2009. Meanwhile, in 2012 and 2014, Kemp averaged just 403.0 and 402.2 feet per home run. Shoulder injuries have robbed Kemp of some of his natural power, which almost assuredly erases his 40-homer upside and could lead to further decline.

Beyond the loss of his natural power, Kemp will now have to play half of his games in San Diego. Last season, PETCO Park allowed nine percent fewer home runs for right-handed hitters than a neutral park, tied for the third lowest index in baseball. Dodger Stadium was exactly league average.

Springer’s projected counting statistics show a slight edge over Kemp in many respects, but his upside in each category is substantially greater. In 2014, Springer hit 20 home runs in just 78 games, which had him on pace for 40 home runs. He was on a similar pace in both Double-A and Triple-A in 2013, and his home park in Houston allowed four percent more home runs to right-handed hitters than an average ballpark. Strangely, Springer stole just five bases in the majors last season, but in 2013, he stole 45 bases across his two stops in the minors. It’s unclear what led to the drop, but at 25 years old, his stolen base totals are far more likely to rebound than Kemp’s are.

If anything can derail Springer’s road to fantasy stardom, it is his strikeout tendency. He struck out an alarming 33 percent of his plate appearances in 2014. Kemp may not share that specific downside concern, but his injury history creates a different sort of risk with an equal downside. And even if he did not, my conservative approach to my early picks makes a riskier investment like Springer more palatable.





Scott Spratt is a fantasy sports writer for FanGraphs and Pro Football Focus. He is a Sloan Sports Conference Research Paper Competition and FSWA award winner. Feel free to ask him questions on Twitter – @Scott_Spratt

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dewon brazeltron
10 years ago

Corey Dickerson went in the 4th round LULZ

YP
10 years ago

crazy that a guy who hits 310+ with 25 homers in less than 600 PA went that high!!!

CC AFCMember since 2016
10 years ago

I would assume that’s the same Corey Dickerson who slashed .312/.364/.567 with 24 HR and 8 SB in just under 500 PA last year…so yeah.

Even if you see some regression there, as Steamer does, his projections, steamer still has him as a 20hr, 10sb player.

Coors Field is a hell of drug.

jcxy
10 years ago

5 OF league as well.

cs3
10 years ago

It is pretty LULZ that Dickerson lasted so long in a 5 OF league.
I would be ecstatic if he fell to me in the 3rd round of any draft, let alone mid 4th.